Understanding Intraoperative Transfusion Decision-Making Variability: A Qualitative Study

被引:4
|
作者
Lenet, Tori [1 ,2 ]
Tropiano, Joseph [1 ]
Skanes, Stephanie [3 ]
Ivankovic, Victoria [3 ]
Verret, Michael [2 ,4 ]
McIsaac, Daniel I. [2 ,5 ]
Tinmouth, Alan [6 ,7 ]
Nicholls, Stuart G. [2 ]
Patey, Andrea M. [2 ]
Fergusson, Dean A. [2 ,7 ]
Martel, Guillaume [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Laval, CHU Quebec, Dept Anesthesia, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Canadian Blood Serv, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Ottawa Hosp, 501 Smyth Rd,CCW 1667b, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
关键词
Intraoperative transfusion; Red blood cell transfusion; Theoretical domains framework; Transfusion decision-making; Transfusion variability; BLOOD-CELL TRANSFUSIONS; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.150726
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There is evidence of significant intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion variability that cannot be explained by case-mix, and may reflect unwarranted transfusions. The objective was to explore the source of intraoperative RBC transfusion variability by eliciting the beliefs of anesthesiologists and sur-geons that underlie transfusion decisions. Interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework were conducted to identify beliefs about intraoperative transfusion. Content analysis was performed to group statements into domains. Relevant domains were selected based on frequency of beliefs, perceived influ-ence on transfusion, and the presence of conflicting beliefs within domains. Of the 28 transfusion experts recruited internationally (16 anesthesiologists, 12 surgeons), 24 (86%) were Canadian or American and 11 (39%) identified as female. Eight relevant domains were identified: (1) Knowledge (insufficient evidence to guide intraoperative transfusion), (2) Social/professional role and identity (surgeons/anesthesiologists share responsibility for transfusions), (3) Beliefs about consequences (concerns about morbidity of trans-fusion/anemia), (4) Environmental context/resources (transfusions influenced by type of surgery, local blood supply, cost of transfusion), (5) Social influences (institutional culture, judgment by peers, surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship, patient preference influencing transfusion decisions), (6) Behavioral regula-tion (need for intraoperative transfusion guidelines, usefulness of audits and educational sessions to guide transfusion), (7) Nature of the behaviors (overtransfusion remains commonplace, transfusion practice be-coming more restrictive over time), and (8) Memory, attention, and decision processes (various patient and operative characteristics are incorporated into transfusion decisions). This study identified a range of fac-tors underlying intraoperative transfusion decision-making and partly explain the variability in transfu-sion behavior. Targeted theory-informed behavior-change interventions derived from this work could help reduce intraoperative transfusion variability.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Intraoperative Echocardiography: Guide to Decision-Making
    Cutrone, Michael
    Cotter, Sarah
    Swaminathan, Madhav
    Mccartney, Sharon
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 26 (06) : 581 - 591
  • [12] Legislative Decision-Making on Education Issues: A Qualitative Study
    Canfield-Davis, Kathy
    Jain, Sachin
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2010, 15 (03) : 600 - 629
  • [13] The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability
    Peters, Jan
    Buechel, Christian
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (05) : 227 - 239
  • [14] Adolescents' Health Literacy and Decision-making: Qualitative Study
    Fleary, Sasha A.
    Joseph, Patrece
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2020, 44 (04): : 392 - 408
  • [15] Unstated factors in orthopaedic decision-making: a qualitative study
    Rachael Gooberman-Hill
    Anna Sansom
    Caroline M Sanders
    Paul A Dieppe
    Jeremy Horwood
    Ian D Learmonth
    Susan Williams
    Jenny L Donovan
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11
  • [16] Late Career Decision-Making: A Qualitative Panel Study
    Furunes, Trude
    Mykletun, Reidar J.
    Solem, Per Erik
    de lange, Annet H.
    Syse, Astri
    Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
    Ilmarinen, Juhani
    WORK AGING AND RETIREMENT, 2015, 1 (03) : 284 - 295
  • [17] Patient and Provider Decision-Making Experiences: A Qualitative Study
    Kinchen, Elizabeth
    Lange, Bernadette
    Newman, David
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 43 (08) : 713 - 722
  • [18] Decision-making dilemmas of paediatricians: a qualitative study in Japan
    Sasazuki, Momoko
    Sakai, Yasunari
    Kira, Ryutaro
    Toda, Naoko
    Ichimiya, Yuko
    Akamine, Satoshi
    Torio, Michiko
    Ishizaki, Yoshito
    Sanefuji, Masafumi
    Narama, Miho
    Itai, Koichiro
    Hara, Toshiro
    Takada, Hidetoshi
    Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
    Ohga, Shouichi
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [19] Unstated factors in orthopaedic decision-making: a qualitative study
    Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
    Sansom, Anna
    Sanders, Caroline M.
    Dieppe, Paul A.
    Horwood, Jeremy
    Learmonth, Ian D.
    Williams, Susan
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2010, 11
  • [20] Understanding Chinese consumers' ethical purchasing decision-making process: A combination of qualitative and quantitative study
    Deng, Xinming
    GEOFORUM, 2015, 67 : 204 - 213