Understanding Intraoperative Transfusion Decision-Making Variability: A Qualitative Study

被引:4
|
作者
Lenet, Tori [1 ,2 ]
Tropiano, Joseph [1 ]
Skanes, Stephanie [3 ]
Ivankovic, Victoria [3 ]
Verret, Michael [2 ,4 ]
McIsaac, Daniel I. [2 ,5 ]
Tinmouth, Alan [6 ,7 ]
Nicholls, Stuart G. [2 ]
Patey, Andrea M. [2 ]
Fergusson, Dean A. [2 ,7 ]
Martel, Guillaume [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Laval, CHU Quebec, Dept Anesthesia, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Canadian Blood Serv, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Ottawa Hosp, 501 Smyth Rd,CCW 1667b, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
关键词
Intraoperative transfusion; Red blood cell transfusion; Theoretical domains framework; Transfusion decision-making; Transfusion variability; BLOOD-CELL TRANSFUSIONS; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.150726
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There is evidence of significant intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion variability that cannot be explained by case-mix, and may reflect unwarranted transfusions. The objective was to explore the source of intraoperative RBC transfusion variability by eliciting the beliefs of anesthesiologists and sur-geons that underlie transfusion decisions. Interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework were conducted to identify beliefs about intraoperative transfusion. Content analysis was performed to group statements into domains. Relevant domains were selected based on frequency of beliefs, perceived influ-ence on transfusion, and the presence of conflicting beliefs within domains. Of the 28 transfusion experts recruited internationally (16 anesthesiologists, 12 surgeons), 24 (86%) were Canadian or American and 11 (39%) identified as female. Eight relevant domains were identified: (1) Knowledge (insufficient evidence to guide intraoperative transfusion), (2) Social/professional role and identity (surgeons/anesthesiologists share responsibility for transfusions), (3) Beliefs about consequences (concerns about morbidity of trans-fusion/anemia), (4) Environmental context/resources (transfusions influenced by type of surgery, local blood supply, cost of transfusion), (5) Social influences (institutional culture, judgment by peers, surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship, patient preference influencing transfusion decisions), (6) Behavioral regula-tion (need for intraoperative transfusion guidelines, usefulness of audits and educational sessions to guide transfusion), (7) Nature of the behaviors (overtransfusion remains commonplace, transfusion practice be-coming more restrictive over time), and (8) Memory, attention, and decision processes (various patient and operative characteristics are incorporated into transfusion decisions). This study identified a range of fac-tors underlying intraoperative transfusion decision-making and partly explain the variability in transfu-sion behavior. Targeted theory-informed behavior-change interventions derived from this work could help reduce intraoperative transfusion variability.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding Homeopathic Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study
    Burch, Alexandra L.
    Dibb, Bridget
    Brien, Sarah B.
    FORSCHENDE KOMPLEMENTARMEDIZIN, 2008, 15 (04): : 218 - 225
  • [2] Understanding parental decision-making for childhood influenza vaccination in Singapore: A qualitative study
    Vishakha, V.
    Offeddu, V.
    Soe, P. M.
    Tam, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 101 : 472 - 473
  • [3] Intraoperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion Decision-making A Systematic Review of Guidelines
    Baker, Laura
    Park, Lily
    Gilbert, Richard
    Ahn, Hilalion
    Martel, Andre
    Lenet, Tori
    Davis, Alexandra
    McIsaac, Daniel I.
    Tinmouth, Alan
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Martel, Guillaume
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (01) : 86 - 96
  • [4] UNDERSTANDING ANTIEPILEPTIC DECISION MAKING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    McCorry, D.
    Marson, A.
    Jacoby, A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 80 (01): : 104 - 104
  • [5] An explorative qualitative study on supported decision-making
    Devi, N.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 27 (04) : 334 - 334
  • [6] Intuition in managers' decision-making: qualitative study
    Mikuskova, Eva Ballova
    JOURNAL OF EAST EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2017, 22 (03) : 318 - 333
  • [7] MALE MENOPAUSE AND DECISION-MAKING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Claassen, Gerrit
    Schurink, Willem
    SA JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 3 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [8] Decision-Making Is in the Making! Aspects of Decision-Making in the Area of Assistive and Welfare Technology-A Qualitative Study
    Baudin, Katarina
    Sundstrom, Angelina
    Borg, Johan
    Gustafsson, Christine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (08)
  • [9] Understanding pre-hospital blood transfusion decision-making for injured patients: an interview study
    Marsden, Max E. R.
    Kellett, Suzie
    Bagga, Rahul
    Wohlgemut, Jared M.
    Lyon, Richard L.
    Perkins, Zane B.
    Gillies, Katie
    Tai, Nigel R. M.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2023, 40 (11) : 777 - +
  • [10] The structure of qualitative decision-making
    Brugha, CM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 104 (01) : 46 - 62