Mapping electric vehicle impacts: greenhouse gas emissions, fuel costs, and energy justice in the United States

被引:29
|
作者
Vega-Perkins, Jesse [1 ]
Newell, Joshua P. [1 ]
Keoleian, Gregory [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ctr Sustainable Syst, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48019 USA
关键词
electric vehicles; decarbonization; life cycle greenhouse gas emissions; fuel costs; levelized cost of charging; transportation energy burden; energy justice; AIR-QUALITY IMPACTS; MOBILITY; POVERTY; CARBON; ELECTRIFICATION; POLLUTANTS; TRANSPORT; ADOPTION; HYBRID;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/aca4e6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The transition to electric vehicles (EVs) will impact the climate, the environment, and society in highly significant ways. This study compares EVs to vehicles with internal combustion engines for three major areas: greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), fuel costs, and transportation energy burden (i.e. percentage of income spent on vehicle fuels). Excluded in the analysis is the purchase cost of the vehicles themselves. The results reveal that over 90% of vehicle-owning U.S. households would see reductions in both GHGs and transportation energy burden by adopting an EV. For 60% of households these savings would be moderate to high (i.e. >2.3 metric tons of CO(2)e reduction per household annually and >0.6% of energy burden reduction). These reductions are especially pronounced in the American West (e.g. California, Washington) and parts of the Northeast (e.g. New York) primarily due to a varying combination of cleaner electricity grids, lower electricity prices (relative to gas prices), and smaller drive-cycle and temperature-related impacts on fuel efficiency. Moreover, adopting an EV would more than double the percentage of households that enjoy a low transportation energy burden (<2% of income spent on fuel annually). This equates to 80% of all vehicle-owning U.S. households. Nevertheless, over half of the lowest income households would still have a high EV energy burden (>4% income spent on fuel annually), and if at-home charging is unavailable, this rises to over 75 percent. Addressing this inequity hinges on three major interventions: 1) targeted policies to promote energy justice in lower-income communities, including subsidizing charging infrastructure; 2) strategies to reduce electricity costs; and 3) expanding access to low-carbon transport infrastructure (e.g. public transit, biking, and car sharing).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE EFFECTS OF BIOGAS FUEL IN AN ELECTRIC GENERATOR ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, POWER OUTPUT, AND FUEL CONSUMPTION
    Itodo, I. N.
    Yakubu, D. K.
    Kaankuka, T. K.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2019, 62 (04) : 951 - 958
  • [42] Impact of recycling on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from electric vehicle production: The China 2025 case
    Hao, Han
    Qiao, Qinyu
    Liu, Zongwei
    Zhao, Fuquan
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 122 : 114 - 125
  • [43] Impacts of urban form on future US passenger-vehicle greenhouse gas emissions
    Hankey, Steve
    Marshall, Julian D.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (09) : 4880 - 4887
  • [44] A review of water and greenhouse gas impacts of unconventional natural gas development in the United States
    Arent D.
    Logan J.
    Macknick J.
    Boyd W.
    Medlock K.
    III
    O’Sullivan F.
    Edmonds J.
    Clarke L.
    Huntington H.
    Heath G.
    Statwick P.
    Bazilian M.
    MRS Energy and Sustainability - A Review Journal, 2015, 2 (1):
  • [45] Total greenhouse gas emissions and costs of alternative swiss energy supply strategies
    Gantner, U
    Jakob, M
    Hirschberg, S
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 991 - 996
  • [46] Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from electric vehicle considering electric energy structure, climate and power economy of ev: A China case
    Li, Jun
    Yang, Bin
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (06) : 1 - 11
  • [47] Alternative-fuel-vehicle policy interactions increase US greenhouse gas emissions
    Jenn, Alan
    Azevedo, Ines L.
    Michalek, Jeremy J.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 124 : 396 - 407
  • [48] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of hydrogen fuel production from chlor-alkali processes in the United States
    Lee, Dong-Yeon
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Dai, Qiang
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 217 : 467 - 479
  • [49] Economic and energy impacts on greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of China and the USA
    Yamaka, Woraphon
    Phadkantha, Rungrapee
    Rakpho, Pichayakone
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 240 - 247
  • [50] Accelerating electric vehicle uptake favours greenhouse gas over air pollutant emissions
    Mehlig, Daniel
    Staffell, Iain
    Stettler, Marc
    Apsimon, Helen
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 124