Mapping electric vehicle impacts: greenhouse gas emissions, fuel costs, and energy justice in the United States

被引:29
|
作者
Vega-Perkins, Jesse [1 ]
Newell, Joshua P. [1 ]
Keoleian, Gregory [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ctr Sustainable Syst, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48019 USA
关键词
electric vehicles; decarbonization; life cycle greenhouse gas emissions; fuel costs; levelized cost of charging; transportation energy burden; energy justice; AIR-QUALITY IMPACTS; MOBILITY; POVERTY; CARBON; ELECTRIFICATION; POLLUTANTS; TRANSPORT; ADOPTION; HYBRID;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/aca4e6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The transition to electric vehicles (EVs) will impact the climate, the environment, and society in highly significant ways. This study compares EVs to vehicles with internal combustion engines for three major areas: greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), fuel costs, and transportation energy burden (i.e. percentage of income spent on vehicle fuels). Excluded in the analysis is the purchase cost of the vehicles themselves. The results reveal that over 90% of vehicle-owning U.S. households would see reductions in both GHGs and transportation energy burden by adopting an EV. For 60% of households these savings would be moderate to high (i.e. >2.3 metric tons of CO(2)e reduction per household annually and >0.6% of energy burden reduction). These reductions are especially pronounced in the American West (e.g. California, Washington) and parts of the Northeast (e.g. New York) primarily due to a varying combination of cleaner electricity grids, lower electricity prices (relative to gas prices), and smaller drive-cycle and temperature-related impacts on fuel efficiency. Moreover, adopting an EV would more than double the percentage of households that enjoy a low transportation energy burden (<2% of income spent on fuel annually). This equates to 80% of all vehicle-owning U.S. households. Nevertheless, over half of the lowest income households would still have a high EV energy burden (>4% income spent on fuel annually), and if at-home charging is unavailable, this rises to over 75 percent. Addressing this inequity hinges on three major interventions: 1) targeted policies to promote energy justice in lower-income communities, including subsidizing charging infrastructure; 2) strategies to reduce electricity costs; and 3) expanding access to low-carbon transport infrastructure (e.g. public transit, biking, and car sharing).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proposed Vehicle Fuel Economy Standards in the United States for 2017 to 2025 Impacts on the Economy, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Karplus, Valerie J.
    Paltsev, Sergey
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2287) : 132 - 139
  • [2] Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Renewable Natural Gas as Vehicle Fuel
    Mintz, Marianne
    Han, Jeongwoo
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2252) : 66 - 74
  • [3] Building commissioning: a golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States
    Evan Mills
    Energy Efficiency, 2011, 4 : 145 - 173
  • [4] Building commissioning: a golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States
    Mills, Evan
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2011, 4 (02) : 145 - 173
  • [5] The correlated impacts of fuel consumption improvements and vehicle electrification on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions in China
    Zhao, Fuquan
    Liu, Feiqi
    Liu, Zongwei
    Hao, Han
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 207 : 702 - 716
  • [6] Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards
    Jenn, Alan
    Azevedo, Ines M. L.
    Michalek, Jeremy J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (05) : 2165 - 2174
  • [7] China's Electric Vehicle Deployment: Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts
    Liu, Feiqi
    Zhao, Fuquan
    Liu, Zongwei
    Hao, Han
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (12)
  • [8] Rethinking electric vehicle smart charging and greenhouse gas emissions: Renewable energy growth, fuel switching, and efficiency improvement
    Zhong, Zewei
    Hu, Wuyang
    Zhao, Xiaoli
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 361
  • [9] Should a vehicle fuel economy standard be combined with an economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions constraint? Implications for energy and climate policy in the United States
    Karplus, Valerie J.
    Paltsev, Sergey
    Babiker, Mustafa
    Reilly, John M.
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 322 - 333
  • [10] Fuel shifts reduce most of the greenhouse gas emissions from transportation in the United States
    Horesh, Noah
    Quinn, Jason C.
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 5 (01):