Clinical Evaluation After Discontinuation of Galcanezumab in Japanese Patients with Episodic and Chronic Migraine: Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial and Open-label Extension Study

被引:0
|
作者
Takeshima, Takao [1 ]
Doi, Hikaru [2 ]
Ooba, Satomi [3 ]
Tanji, Yuka [4 ]
Ozeki, Akichika [4 ]
Komori, Mika [4 ]
机构
[1] Tominaga Hosp, Headache Ctr, Dept Neurol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Doi Clin Internal Med Neurol, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Ooba Clin, Dept Neurosurg & Headache, Oita, Japan
[4] Eli Lilly Japan KK, Japan Drug Dev & Med Affairs, 5-1-28 Isogamidori,Chuo Ku, Kobe 6510086, Japan
关键词
Anti-CGRP mAb; Clinical factors; Drug discontinuation; Galcanezumab; Japan; Migraine disorders; Migraine headache days; Open-label extension study; Post-treatment; Randomized controlled trial; DOUBLE-BLIND; SAFETY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s40120-024-00602-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction This analysis of two Japanese clinical trials evaluated efficacy and safety after galcanezumab (GMB) discontinuation in patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM).Methods Data were from a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo [PBO]-controlled primary trial (patients with EM) and a 12-month open-label extension trial (patients with EM/CM). Patients received 6 months' (primary) or 12/18 months' (extension) treatment with GMB 120 mg (GMB120) plus 240-mg loading dose or 240 mg (GMB240) with 4 months' post-treatment follow-up. Efficacy was assessed as number of monthly migraine headache days during post-treatment. Safety was assessed via post-treatment-emergent adverse events (PTEAEs).Results The analysis population included 186 patients from the primary trial (PBO N = 93; GMB120 N = 45; GMB240 N = 48), 220 patients with EM from the extension trial (PBO/GMB120 N = 57; PBO/GMB240 N = 55; GMB120/GMB120 N = 55; GMB240/GMB240 N = 53), and 55 patients with CM (GMB120 N = 28; GMB240 N = 27). In patients with EM receiving 6 months' GMB120, mean standard deviation (SD) monthly migraine headache days increased from 5.69 (4.64) at treatment end to 6.24 (4.37) at end of follow-up but did not return to pre-treatment levels (8.80 [2.96]). In the extension trial, mean monthly migraine headache days in patients with EM receiving GMB120 were 4.13 (3.85) after 12 months and 4.45 (3.78) at end of follow-up, and 3.59 (3.48) after 18 months and 3.91 (3.57) at end of follow-up. Monthly migraine headache days in patients with CM (12 months' GMB120) were 10.71 (4.61) at treatment end and 11.17 (5.64) at end of follow-up (pre-treatment 20.15 [4.65]). Similar results were seen for patients receiving GMB240. The most observed PTEAE after GMB discontinuation was nasopharyngitis.Conclusion Galcanezumab exhibited post-treatment efficacy for up to 4 months in Japanese patients with EM and with CM. No unexpected safety signals were observed.Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02959177 and NCT02959190.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 714
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of the Digital Therapeutic sinCephalea in the prophylaxis of migraine in patients with episodic migraine: study protocol for a digital, randomized, open-label, standard treatment controlled trial
    Torsten Schröder
    Hanna C. B. Brudermann
    Gianna Kühn
    Christian Sina
    Diamant Thaçi
    Matthias Nitschke
    Inke R. König
    Trials, 23
  • [32] Oral esketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with open-label extension
    Smith-Apeldoorn, Sanne Y.
    Veraart, Jolien K. E.
    Kamphuis, Jeanine
    Spijker, Jan
    van der Meij, Annemarie
    van Asselt, Antoinette D. I.
    aan het Rot, Marije
    Schoevers, Robert A.
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 29 (09) : 2657 - 2665
  • [33] Efficacy Results from an Open-Label Safety Study of Galcanezumab in Patients with Episodic or Chronic Cluster Headache
    Gaul, C.
    Riesenberg, R.
    Stroud, C.
    Dong, Y.
    Oakes, T. Myers
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2021, 22 (SUPPL 2):
  • [34] Long-term open-label safety study of galcanezumab in patients with episodic or chronic cluster headache
    Riesenberg, Robert
    Gaul, Charly
    Stroud, Chad E.
    Dong, Yan
    Bangs, Mark E.
    Wenzel, Richard
    Martinez, James M.
    Oakes, Tina Myers
    CEPHALALGIA, 2022, 42 (11-12) : 1225 - 1235
  • [35] The safety and tolerability of vortioxetine: Analysis of data from randomized placebo-controlled trials and open-label extension studies
    Baldwin, David S.
    Chrones, Lambros
    Florea, Ioana
    Nielsen, Rebecca
    Nomikos, George G.
    Palo, William
    Reines, Elin
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 242 - 252
  • [36] Open-label placebo treatment in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Carvalho, Claudia
    Caetano, Joaquim Machado
    Cunha, Lidia
    Rebouta, Paula
    Kaptchuk, Ted J.
    Kirsch, Irving
    PAIN, 2016, 157 (12) : 2766 - 2772
  • [37] Alogliptin plus voglibose in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label, long-term extension
    Seino, Yutaka
    Fujita, Tetsuya
    Hiroi, Shinzo
    Hirayama, Masashi
    Kaku, Kohei
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2011, 27 : 21 - 29
  • [38] A prospective, open-label study of milnacipran in the prevention of headache in patients with episodic or chronic migraine
    Emily Rubenstein Engel
    David Kudrow
    Alan M. Rapoport
    Neurological Sciences, 2014, 35 : 429 - 435
  • [39] A prospective, open-label study of milnacipran in the prevention of headache in patients with episodic or chronic migraine
    Engel, Emily Rubenstein
    Kudrow, David
    Rapoport, Alan M.
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 35 (03) : 429 - 435
  • [40] Patients with psoriasis respond to continuous open-label etanercept treatment after initial incomplete response in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Krueger, GG
    Elewski, B
    Papp, K
    Wang, A
    Zitnik, R
    Jahreis, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 54 (03) : S112 - S119