The 7-day recall period version of the Urticaria Control Test-UCT7

被引:7
|
作者
Buttgereit, Thomas [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Salameh, Pascale [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Sydorenko, Olga [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zuberbier, Torsten [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Metz, Martin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Weller, Karsten [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Maurer, Marcus [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Allergol, Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Fraunhofer Inst Translat Med & Pharmacol ITMP, Dept Allergol & Immunol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Med, Byblos, Lebanon
[6] Univ Nicosia, Med Sch, Nicosia, Cyprus
[7] Inst Natl Sante Publ Epidemiol Clin & Toxicol INSP, Beirut, Lebanon
[8] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Allergol, Campus Benjamin Franklin, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Chronic urticaria; control; PROM; UCT; UCT7; 7-day recall period; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REPORTED OUTCOME INSTRUMENT; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2023.03.034
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The Urticaria Control Test (UCT) is a well-established, very easy to use and calculate 4-item patient-reported outcome measure to assess chronic urticaria disease control during the previous 4 weeks. Clinical trials and practice may benefit from the use of a UCT version with a shorter recall period, but this does not exist.Objectives: We sought to develop and validate a UCT version with a 7-day recall period, the UCT7.Methods: The UCT7 was developed, based on the UCT, and tested, in 152 patients with chronic urticaria (spontaneous: n = 101, inducible: n = 51) for its reliability, validity and screening accuracy, and clinimetric properties, in other words, the cutoff for well-controlled disease and the minimal clinically important difference.Results: The UCT7 showed excellent internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach avalue of 0.91 and test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83. Convergent validity was high and strongly correlated with anchors of disease control, wheal and angioedema frequency, and urticaria-related quality of life impairment. The UCT7 showed excellent sensitivity to change; however, changes in angioedema activity and impact did not correlate well with changes in UCT7. Based on receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the proportion of correctly classified patients, and patients' assessment of treatment efficacy, we recommend a cutoff value of 12 points for identifying patients with well-controlled disease. The UCT7 minimal clinically important difference for improvement was estimated to be 2 points. Conclusions: The UCT7 is a validated 7-day recall period version of the UCT. It is ideal for the assessment of disease control at short intervals in patients with chronic urticaria in clinical studies and practice. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023;152:1210-7.)
引用
收藏
页码:1210 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the chinese version of urticaria control test (UCT)
    Yu, M.
    Chen, Y.
    Liu, B.
    Song, X.
    Zhao, Z.
    ALLERGY, 2020, 75 : 597 - 597
  • [2] Physical activity during pregnancy: Comparing a 7-day recall to a 7-day diary
    Poudevigne, M
    O'Connor, PJ
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (05): : S112 - S113
  • [3] A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire
    Niels Waller
    Mike T. John
    Leah Feuerstahler
    Kazuyoshi Baba
    Pernilla Larsson
    Sanja Peršić
    Dóra Kende
    Daniel R. Reißmann
    Ksenija Rener-Sitar
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2016, 20 : 91 - 99
  • [4] A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire
    Waller, Niels
    John, Mike T.
    Feuerstahler, Leah
    Baba, Kazuyoshi
    Larsson, Pernilla
    Persic, Sanja
    Kende, Dora
    Reissmann, Daniel R.
    Rener-Sitar, Ksenija
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [5] Does recall period matter? Comparing PROMIS® physical function with no recall, 24-hr recall, and 7-day recall
    David M. Condon
    Robert Chapman
    Sara Shaunfield
    Michael A. Kallen
    Jennifer L. Beaumont
    Daniel Eek
    Debanjali Mitra
    Katy L. Benjamin
    Kelly McQuarrie
    Jamae Liu
    James W. Shaw
    Allison Martin Nguyen
    Karen Keating
    David Cella
    Quality of Life Research, 2020, 29 : 745 - 753
  • [6] Validity, reliability and interpretability of the Thai version of the urticaria control test (UCT)
    Kulthanan, Kanokvalai
    Chularojanamontri, Leena
    Tuchinda, Papapit
    Rujitharanawong, Chuda
    Maurer, Marcus
    Weller, Karsten
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2016, 14
  • [7] Does recall period matter? Comparing PROMIS physical function with no recall, 24-hr recall, and 7-day recall
    Condon, David M.
    Chapman, Robert
    Shaunfield, Sara
    Kallen, Michael A.
    Beaumont, Jennifer L.
    Eek, Daniel
    Mitra, Debanjali
    Benjamin, Katy L.
    McQuarrie, Kelly
    Liu, Jamae
    Shaw, James W.
    Martin Nguyen, Allison
    Keating, Karen
    Cella, David
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (03) : 745 - 753
  • [8] Validity, reliability and interpretability of the Thai version of the urticaria control test (UCT)
    Kanokvalai Kulthanan
    Leena Chularojanamontri
    Papapit Tuchinda
    Chuda Rujitharanawong
    Marcus Maurer
    Karsten Weller
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14
  • [9] Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of Urticaria Control Test (UCT)
    Khoshkhui, Maryam
    Weller, Karsten
    Fadaee, Javad
    Maurer, Marcus
    Azad, Farahzad Jabbari
    Emadzadeh, Maryam
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ALLERGY ASTHMA AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 20 (04) : 423 - 431
  • [10] 7 BRANDS IN 7-DAY
    GEIGER, JA
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 1971, 11 (05) : 15 - 22