Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Multiple-Choice Questions for Pharmacy Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Leslie, Tara [1 ]
Gierl, Mark J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Educ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
automatic item generation; multiple-choice questions; pharmacy assessment; test development; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100081
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: Automatic item generation (AIG) is a new area of assessment research where a set of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are created using models and computer technology. Although successfully demonstrated in medicine and dentistry, AIG has not been implemented in pharmacy. The objective was to implement AIG to create a set of MCQs appropriate for inclusion in a summative, high-stakes, pharmacy examination.Methods: A 3-step process, well evidenced in AIG research, was employed to create the pharmacy MCQs. The first step was developing a cognitive model based on content within the examination blueprint. Second, an item model was developed based on the cognitive model. A process of systematic distractor generation was also incorporated to optimize distractor plausibility. Third, we used computer technology to assemble a set of test items based on the cognitive and item models. A sample of generated items was assessed for quality against Gierl and Lai's 8 guidelines of item quality.Results: More than 15,000 MCQs were generated to measure knowledge and skill of patient assessment and treatment of nausea and/or vomiting within the scope of clinical pharmacy. A sample of generated items satisfies the requirements of content-related validity and quality after substantive review.Conclusion: This research demonstrates the AIG process is a viable strategy for creating a test item bank to provide MCQs appropriate for inclusion in a pharmacy licensing examination.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS IN MATHEMATICS
    Smetanova, D.
    EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 2220 - 2224
  • [42] ITEM MODELING PROCEDURE FOR CONSTRUCTING CONTENT-EQUIVALENT MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS
    LADUCA, A
    STAPLES, WI
    TEMPLETON, B
    HOLZMAN, GB
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1986, 20 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [43] Peer Generation of Multiple-Choice Questions: Student Engagement and Experiences
    Rhind, Susan M.
    Pettigrew, Graham W.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 39 (04) : 375 - 379
  • [44] RETRACTED: Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in Teaching Prosthodontics (Retracted Article)
    Madhav, V. N. V.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2015, 79 (11) : 1314 - 1319
  • [45] Developing an Array Binary Code Assessment Rubric for Multiple-Choice Questions Using Item Arrays and Binary-Coded Responses
    Haro, Elizabeth K.
    Haro, Luis S.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 91 (12) : 2064 - 2070
  • [46] An Item Analysis of Written Multiple-Choice Questions: Kashan University of Medical Sciences
    Sayyah, Mansour
    Vakili, Zarichehr
    Alavi, Negin Masoudi
    Bigdeli, Manzardokht
    Soleymani, Alireza
    Assarian, Mohammad
    Azarbad, Zohreh
    NURSING AND MIDWIFERY STUDIES, 2012, 1 (02)
  • [47] Item analysis of National Geography Olympiad multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in Indonesia
    Logayah, Dina Siti
    Ruhimat, Mamat
    Arrasyid, Riko
    Islamy, M. Rindu Fajar
    COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [48] SOME MODIFICATIONS OF THE MULTIPLE-CHOICE ITEM
    Dressel, Paul L.
    Schmid, John
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1953, 13 (04) : 574 - 595
  • [49] Assessment of Global Health Education: The Role of Multiple-Choice Questions
    Douthit, Nathan T.
    Norcini, John
    Mazuz, Keren
    Alkan, Michael
    Feuerstein, Marie-Therese
    Clarfield, A. Mark
    Dwolatzky, Tzvi
    Solomonov, Evgeny
    Waksman, Igor
    Biswas, Seema
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [50] Crowdsourcing the Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions Using Item-Writing Flaws and Bloom's Taxonomy
    Moore, Steven
    Fang, Ellen
    Nguyen, Huy A.
    Stamper, John
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH ACM CONFERENCE ON LEARNING @ SCALE, L@S 2023, 2023, : 25 - 34