Residual motion of different posterior instrumentation and interbody fusion constructs

被引:3
|
作者
Burkhard, Marco D. [1 ]
Spirig, Jose M. [1 ]
Wanivenhaus, Florian [1 ]
Cornaz, Frederic [1 ]
Fasser, Marie-Rosa [2 ,3 ]
Widmer, Jonas [2 ,3 ]
Farshad, Mazda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Forchstr 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Biomech, Balgrist Campus,Lengghalde 5, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Spine Biomech, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Interbody fusion; PLIF; TLIF; Unilateral; Facet-sparing; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; CARBON-FIBER IMPLANT; LUMBAR FUSION; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; STABILITY; TLIF; PLIF;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-023-07597-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeTo elucidate residual motion of cortical screw (CS) and pedicle screw (PS) constructs with unilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion (ul-PLIF), bilateral PLIF (bl-PLIF), facet-sparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (fs-TLIF), and facet-resecting TLIF (fr-TLIF).MethodsA total of 35 human cadaver lumbar segments were instrumented with PS (n = 18) and CS (n = 17). Range of motion (ROM) and relative ROM changes were recorded in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), and axial compression (AC) in five instrumentational states: without interbody fusion (wo-IF), ul-PLIF, bl-PLIF, fs-TLIF, and fr-TLIF.ResultsWhereas FE, LB, AR, and AC noticeably differed between the instrumentational states, AS and LS were less prominently affected. Compared to wo-IF, ul-PLIF caused a significant increase in ROM with PS (FE + 42%, LB + 24%, AR + 34%, and AC + 77%), however, such changes were non-significant with CS. ROM was similar between wo-IF and all other interbody fusion techniques. Insertion of a second PLIF (bl-PLIF) significantly decreased ROM with CS (FE -17%, LB -26%, AR -20%, AC -51%) and PS (FE - 23%, LB - 14%, AR - 20%, AC - 45%,). Facet removal in TLIF significantly increased ROM with CS (FE + 6%, LB + 9%, AR + 17%, AC of + 23%) and PS (FE + 7%, AR + 12%, AC + 13%).Conclusionbl-PLIF and TLIF show similarly low residual motion in both PS and CS constructs, but ul-PLIF results in increased motion. The fs-TLIF technique is able to further decrease motion compared to fr-TLIF in both the CS and PS constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:1411 / 1420
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-stage transforaminal decompression, debridement, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation for lumbosacral brucellosis
    Abulizi, Yakefu
    Liang, Wei-Dong
    Muheremu, Aikeremujiang
    Maimaiti, Maierdan
    Sheng, Wei-Bin
    BMC SURGERY, 2017, 17
  • [42] Surgical treatment for lumbar tuberculosis by posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, and instrumentation in the aged
    Yu, Bo
    He, Yu
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [43] Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anteriorly Placed Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    McCurdy, Michael A.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Fras, Sebastian I.
    Purtill, William
    Millar, Ben
    Kolowrat, Samantha
    Issa, Tariq Z.
    D'Antonio, Nicholas D.
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Kaye, Ian David
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (15) : 1078 - 1084
  • [44] Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis
    Demirayak, Mehmet
    Sisman, Lokman
    Turkmen, Faik
    Efe, Duran
    Pekince, Oguzhan
    Goncu, Recep Gani
    Sever, Cem
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05) : 713 - 720
  • [45] Biomechanical evaluation of different oblique lumbar interbody fusion constructs: a finite element analysis
    Xu, Zhengquan
    Zheng, Qingcong
    Zhang, Liqun
    Chen, Rongsheng
    Li, Zhechen
    Xu, Weihong
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [46] Biomechanical evaluation of different oblique lumbar interbody fusion constructs: a finite element analysis
    Zhengquan Xu
    Qingcong Zheng
    Liqun Zhang
    Rongsheng Chen
    Zhechen Li
    Weihong Xu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 25
  • [47] Biomechanical evaluation of four different posterior instrumentation techniques for single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
    Guo, Hui-Zhi
    Tang, Yong-Chao
    Guo, Dan-Qing
    Liang, De
    Zhang, Shun-Cong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (10): : 6160 - 6169
  • [48] POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND PLATES
    STEFFEE, AD
    SITKOWSKI, DJ
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1988, (227) : 99 - 102
  • [49] Advances in posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Brislin, B
    Vaccaro, AR
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 33 (02) : 367 - +
  • [50] Skip constructs in spinal muscular atrophy: outcomes of a novel approach for posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion
    Matthew W. Konigsberg
    Hiroko Matsumoto
    Jacob R. Ball
    Benjamin D. Roye
    Michael G. Vitale
    Spine Deformity, 2020, 8 : 1093 - 1097