Corneal densitometry patterns in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty

被引:7
|
作者
Peraza-Nieves, Jorge [1 ]
Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jose-Maria [2 ]
Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Rachwani-Anil, Rahul [5 ]
Sanchez-Valera, Miriam [1 ]
Borroni, Davide [6 ,7 ]
Torras-Sanvicens, Josep [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Ophthalmol, Inst Clin Oftalmol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Dept Phys Condensed Matter, Opt Area, Reina Mercedes St, Seville, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Virgen Nieves, Dept Ophthalmol, Granada, Spain
[4] Vithas Virgen Mar Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Qvis, Almeria, Spain
[5] Reg Univ Hosp Malaga, Dept Ophthalmol, Malaga, Spain
[6] Riga Stradins Univ, Dept Doctoral Studies, Riga, Latvia
[7] Fdn Banca Occhi Veneto Onlus, Venice, Italy
关键词
Corneal densitometry; Keratoplasty; DMEK; DSAEK; Backscatter; ULTRATHIN; OUTCOMES; DMEK; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-021-01817-x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare corneal densitometry in a consecutive series of 52 endothelial keratoplasties (DMEK/DSAEK) using a Scheimpflug-based device after six months of follow-up. Methods Corneal densitometry (CD) values of 102 eyes were divided into three main groups: 33 DMEKs, 19 DSAEKs, and 50 healthy eyes without previous ocular surgery. The CD values were then analyzed and compared between the groups. We measured three main layers in depth and four different concentric zones at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results In the DMEK group, total CD significantly decreased from 38.02 +/- 10.21 grayscale units (GSU) to 31.13 +/- 9.25 GSU (P < 0.01) between the first and the sixth month postoperative. In the DSAEK group, we found significant changes only between the first and three months after surgery (from 42.62 +/- 9.31 GSU to 38.71 +/- 10.53 GSU (P < 0.01). Regarding the concentric zones, CD in the DMEK group significantly decreased in the central zone from 33.55 +/- 12.07 GSU to 30.63 +/- 10.15 GSU (P < 0.01) and significantly increased in the periphery from 30.63 +/- 10.15 GSU to 36.72 +/- 9.37 GSU, (P < 0.01). The DSAEK group showed no changes in the central zone (from 36.91 +/- 13.80 GSU to 36.14 +/- 11.47 GSU, P = 0.52) and CD significantly increased in the periphery (41.91 +/- 9.28 GSU, P < 0.01). Conclusion When comparing CD values in DMEK versus DSAEK, we found no differences by layers or at central-paracentral concentric zones, although CD differences in the peripheral zones were statistically significant. This finding may be attributed to the thicker graft at periphery with a delayed clearance and less anatomical interphase in DSAEK.
引用
收藏
页码:4409 / 4417
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Failed Descemet Stripping Without Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Rao, Rohini
    Borkar, Durga S.
    Colby, Kathryn A.
    Veldman, Peter B.
    CORNEA, 2017, 36 (07) : 763 - 766
  • [32] Corneal Sensation After Descemet Stripping and Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Kumar, Radhika L.
    Koenig, Steven B.
    Covert, Douglas J.
    CORNEA, 2010, 29 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [33] Microthin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Matsou, Artemis
    Pujari, Rathin
    Sarwar, Hammad
    Rana, Mrinal
    Myerscough, James
    Thomson, Susan M.
    Nandakumar, Girinath
    Zhang, Jufen
    Rajan, Madhavan S.
    CORNEA, 2021, 40 (09) : 1117 - 1125
  • [34] Topographic characteristics after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
    Hayashi, Takahiko
    Yamaguchi, Takefumi
    Yuda, Kentaro
    Kato, Naoko
    Satake, Yoshiyuki
    Shimazaki, Jun
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [35] Prevention and management of complications in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)
    Cursiefen, C.
    Steven, P.
    Roters, S.
    Heindl, L. M.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2013, 110 (07): : 614 - +
  • [36] Lower Corneal Haze and Aberrations in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Fellow Eyes for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
    Waldrop, William H.
    Gillings, Matthew J.
    Robertson, Danielle M.
    Petroll, W. Matthew
    Mootha, V. Vinod
    CORNEA, 2020, 39 (10) : 1227 - 1234
  • [37] Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial A Randomized Trial Comparing Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Chamberlain, Winston
    Lin, Charles C.
    Austin, Ariana
    Schubach, Nicholas
    Clover, Jameson
    McLeod, Stephen D.
    Porco, Travis C.
    Lietman, Thomas M.
    Rose-Nussbaumer, Jennifer
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [38] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty to Treat Graft Failure after Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Oh, Si Eun
    Ha, Min Ji
    Whang, Woong Joo
    Byun, Yong-Soo
    Hwang, Hyung Bin
    Na, Kyung Sun
    Rho, Chang Rae
    Lee, Hyun Soo
    Chung, So-Hyang
    Kim, Eun Chul
    Cho, Yang Kyung
    Kim, Hyun Seung
    Kim, Man Soo
    Hwang, Ho Sik
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (12): : 1532 - 1537
  • [39] Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty: An alternative to penetrating keratoplasty
    Chih, Andreea
    Lugo, Miguel
    Kowing, Dianne
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2008, 85 (03) : 152 - 157
  • [40] Repeat keratoplasty in failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
    Kaur, Manpreet
    Titiyal, Jeewan S.
    Gagrani, Meghal
    Shaikh, Farin
    Agarwal, Tushar
    Sinha, Rajesh
    Sharma, Namrata
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 67 (10) : 1586 - 1592