Corneal densitometry patterns in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty

被引:5
|
作者
Peraza-Nieves, Jorge [1 ]
Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jose-Maria [2 ]
Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Rachwani-Anil, Rahul [5 ]
Sanchez-Valera, Miriam [1 ]
Borroni, Davide [6 ,7 ]
Torras-Sanvicens, Josep [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Ophthalmol, Inst Clin Oftalmol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Dept Phys Condensed Matter, Opt Area, Reina Mercedes St, Seville, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Virgen Nieves, Dept Ophthalmol, Granada, Spain
[4] Vithas Virgen Mar Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Qvis, Almeria, Spain
[5] Reg Univ Hosp Malaga, Dept Ophthalmol, Malaga, Spain
[6] Riga Stradins Univ, Dept Doctoral Studies, Riga, Latvia
[7] Fdn Banca Occhi Veneto Onlus, Venice, Italy
关键词
Corneal densitometry; Keratoplasty; DMEK; DSAEK; Backscatter; ULTRATHIN; OUTCOMES; DMEK; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-021-01817-x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare corneal densitometry in a consecutive series of 52 endothelial keratoplasties (DMEK/DSAEK) using a Scheimpflug-based device after six months of follow-up. Methods Corneal densitometry (CD) values of 102 eyes were divided into three main groups: 33 DMEKs, 19 DSAEKs, and 50 healthy eyes without previous ocular surgery. The CD values were then analyzed and compared between the groups. We measured three main layers in depth and four different concentric zones at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results In the DMEK group, total CD significantly decreased from 38.02 +/- 10.21 grayscale units (GSU) to 31.13 +/- 9.25 GSU (P < 0.01) between the first and the sixth month postoperative. In the DSAEK group, we found significant changes only between the first and three months after surgery (from 42.62 +/- 9.31 GSU to 38.71 +/- 10.53 GSU (P < 0.01). Regarding the concentric zones, CD in the DMEK group significantly decreased in the central zone from 33.55 +/- 12.07 GSU to 30.63 +/- 10.15 GSU (P < 0.01) and significantly increased in the periphery from 30.63 +/- 10.15 GSU to 36.72 +/- 9.37 GSU, (P < 0.01). The DSAEK group showed no changes in the central zone (from 36.91 +/- 13.80 GSU to 36.14 +/- 11.47 GSU, P = 0.52) and CD significantly increased in the periphery (41.91 +/- 9.28 GSU, P < 0.01). Conclusion When comparing CD values in DMEK versus DSAEK, we found no differences by layers or at central-paracentral concentric zones, although CD differences in the peripheral zones were statistically significant. This finding may be attributed to the thicker graft at periphery with a delayed clearance and less anatomical interphase in DSAEK.
引用
收藏
页码:4409 / 4417
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corneal densitometry patterns in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty
    Jorge Peraza-Nieves
    José-María Sánchez-González
    Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
    Rahul Rachwani-Anil
    Miriam Sánchez-Valera
    Davide Borroni
    Josep Torras-Sanvicens
    International Ophthalmology, 2023, 43 : 4409 - 4417
  • [2] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Tourtas, Theofilos
    Laaser, Kathrin
    Bachmann, Bjoern O.
    Cursiefen, Claus
    Kruse, Friedrich E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 153 (06) : 1082 - 1090
  • [3] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Woo, Jyh-Haur
    Ang, Marcus
    Htoon, Hla Myint
    Tan, Donald
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 207 : 288 - 303
  • [4] Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
    Viberg, Andreas
    Samolov, Branka
    Bystroem, Berit
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 130 (12) : 1248 - 1257
  • [5] Is Nanothin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Comparable to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?
    Sahay, Pranita
    Singhal, Deepali
    Maharana, Prafulla K.
    Titiyal, Jeewan S.
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (12) : E56 - E56
  • [6] Where is endothelial keratoplasty going: from Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty to Descemet membrane endothelial transfer?
    Tong, C. Maya
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2012, 47 (03): : 197 - 199
  • [7] Endothelial Keratoplasty: Fellow Eyes Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Guerra, Frederico P.
    Anshu, Arundhati
    Price, Marianne O.
    Price, Francis W.
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (12) : 1382 - 1386
  • [8] A Comparison of the Corneal Thickness Following Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Sunouchi, Chihiro
    Hayashi, Takahiko
    Shimizu, Toshiki
    Hara, Yusuke
    Kurita, Junki
    Kobashigawa, Hiroko
    Oyakawa, Itaru
    Ida, Yasutsugu
    Kobayashi, Akira
    Shoji, Jun
    Yamagami, Satoru
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2023, 48 (08) : 712 - 718
  • [9] Fellow Eye Comparison of Corneal Thickness and Curvature in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Goldich, Yakov
    Artornsombidth, Pichaporn
    Avni-Zauberman, Noa
    Perez, Mauricio
    Ulate, Randall
    Elbaz, Uri
    Rootman, David S.
    CORNEA, 2014, 33 (06) : 547 - 550
  • [10] Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Treatment of Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Einan-Lifshitz, Adi
    Mednick, Zale
    Belkin, Avner
    Sorkin, Nir
    Alshaker, Sara
    Boutin, Tanguy
    Chan, Clara C.
    Rootman, David S.
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (09) : 1077 - 1082