Misdiagnosis of Uncomplicated Cellulitis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Nightingale, Rachael [1 ]
Yadav, Krishan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hamill, Laura [5 ]
Glasziou, Paul [6 ]
Scott, Anna Mae [6 ]
Clark, Justin [6 ]
Keijzers, Gerben [1 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Southport, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Emergency Med, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Te Whatu Ora, Emergency Dept, Christchurch, New Zealand
[6] Bond Univ, Inst Evidence Based Healthcare, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[7] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[8] Griffith Univ, Sch Med & Dent, Southport, Qld, Australia
[9] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Southport, Qld, Australia
关键词
cellulitis; erysipelas; pseudocellulitis; misdiagnosis; DERMATOLOGY CONSULTATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-023-08229-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cellulitis is a clinical diagnosis with several mimics and no gold standard diagnostic criteria. Misdiagnosis is common. This review aims to quantify the proportion of cellulitis misdiagnosis in primary or unscheduled care settings based on a second clinical assessment and describe the proportion and types of alternative diagnoses.Methods Electronic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane library (including CENTRAL) using MeSH and other subject terms identified 887 randomised and non-randomised clinical trials, and cohort studies. Included articles assessed the proportion of cellulitis misdiagnosis in primary or unscheduled care settings through a second clinical assessment up to 14 days post initial diagnosis of uncomplicated cellulitis. Studies on infants and patients with (peri-)orbital, purulent and severe or complex cellulitis were excluded. Screening and data extraction was conducted independently in pairs. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified risk of bias tool from Hoy et al. Meta-analyses were undertaken where =3 studies reported the same outcome.Results Nine studies conducted in the USA, UK and Canada, including a total of 1600 participants, were eligible for inclusion. Six studies were conducted in the inpatient setting; three were in outpatient clinics. All nine included studies provided estimates of the proportion cellulitis misdiagnosis, with a range from 19 to 83%. The mean proportion misdiagnosed was 41% (95% CI 28 to 56% for random effects model). Heterogeneity between studies was very high both statistically (I-2 96%, p-value for heterogeneity < 0.001) and clinically. Of the misdiagnoses, 54% were attributed to three conditions (stasis dermatitis, eczematous dermatitis and edema/lymphedema).Discussion The proportion of cellulitis misdiagnosis when reviewed within 14 days was substantial though highly variable, with the majority attributable to three diagnoses. This highlights the need for timely clinical reassessment and system initiatives to improve diagnostic accuracy of cellulitis and its most common mimics.
引用
收藏
页码:2396 / 2404
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Antibiotics vs no antibiotics in the treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tandon, A.
    Fretwell, V. L.
    Nunes, Q. M.
    Rooney, P. S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (03) : 179 - 188
  • [42] Nonoperative vs Operative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    de Almeida Leite, Rodrigo Moises
    Seo, Dong Joo
    Gomez-Eslava, Barbara
    Hossain, Sigma
    Lesegretain, Arnaud
    de Souza, Alexandre Venancio
    Bay, Camden Phillip
    Zilberstein, Bruno
    Marchi, Evaldo
    Machado, Rogerio Bonassi
    Barchi, Leandro Cardoso
    Ricciardi, Rocco
    JAMA SURGERY, 2022, 157 (09) : 828 - 834
  • [43] Clindamycin plus quinine for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Charles O Obonyo
    Elizabeth A Juma
    Malaria Journal, 11
  • [44] The Role of Systemic Steroids in the Management of Periorbital Cellulitis Secondary to Sinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Luke, L.
    Mahalingam, S.
    Pundir, V.
    Pundir, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 81 - 81
  • [45] A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Povoa-Santos, Luciana
    Lacerda-Santos, Rogerio
    Alvarenga-Brant, Rachel
    Notaro, Sarah Queiroz
    Souza-Oliveira, Ana Clara
    Occhi-Alexandre, Ingrid Gomes Peres
    Martins-Pfeifer, Carolina Castro
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 155 (01):
  • [46] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Daigneault, Pierre-Marc
    POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2009, 7 (02) : 274 - 276
  • [47] Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Delgado-Rodriguez, M.
    Sillero-Arenas, M.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2018, 42 (07) : 444 - 453
  • [48] Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Galanis, P.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (06): : 826 - 841
  • [49] METHODOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS AND A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Aguilera-Eguia, Raul Alberto
    Fuentes-Barria, Hector
    Yanez-Baeza, Cristian
    Perez-Galdavini, Victor
    Inostroza-Reyes, Gloria
    Roco-Videla, Angel
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2022, 39 (05) : 1192 - 1193
  • [50] Systematic review and meta-analysis of reflexology for people with multiple sclerosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ma, Xiaohong
    Yuan, Zhaoyu
    Qian, Baicheng
    Guan, Yunxiang
    Wang, Baoliang
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (05) : E32661