The Clinical Performance of the BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viruses and Bacteria from Nasopharyngeal Swabs

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Xin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Knoth, Colleen [4 ,9 ]
Pham, Anh [4 ]
Lima, Amorce [5 ]
Dominguez, Rosario [6 ]
Ibarra-Flores, Irvin [6 ]
Lopez, Juan C. [1 ]
Uy, Dominic [5 ]
Silbert, Suzane [5 ]
Patel, Anami [8 ]
Aye, Michael [4 ]
Tang, Yi-Wei [1 ,10 ]
Dien Bard, Jennifer [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] Sichuan Acad Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Appl BioCode Inc, Santa Fe Springs, CA USA
[5] Tampa Gen Hosp, Tampa, FL USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Angeles, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
[7] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[8] PathAI Diagnost, Memphis, TN USA
[9] Thermo Fisher Sci, San Diego, CA USA
[10] Danaher Diagnost Platform Cepheid China, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM | 2023年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
respiratory pathogens; syndromic testing; multiplex PCR; scalable throughput; INFECTIONS; DISEASE; SINGLE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.04044-22
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) utilizes reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify respiratory pathogens. This panel qualitatively detects and identifies 14 viruses, including influenza virus A with H1 pdm09, H1, and H3 subtyping; influenza B; respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); human metapneumovirus; parainfluenza virus 1; parainfluenza virus 2; parainfluenza virus 3; parainfluenza virus 4; coronavirus (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1); adenovirus; and human rhinovirus/enterovirus, and 3 bacteria, including Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis. Reproducibility, which was assessed with contrived specimens containing 12 targets at 3 clinical sites, with 2 operators at each site for 5 days, was 99.4% for Flu A H3 and Flu B, 98.9% for RSV, and 100% for the remaining 9 targets assayed. A multicenter clinical trial evaluated the performance of the BioCode RPP with 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from 5 geographically distinct sites and revealed comparable performance between the BioCode RPP and FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FA-RP). Specifically, the positive percent agreements (PPAs) for various pathogens ranged between 80.8% and 100% compared with the FA-RP (1.7 and 2.0). Negative percent agreement ranged from 98.4% to 100% for BioCode RPP. The BioCode RPP also offers scalable automated testing capability of up to 96 specimens in a single run with total sample-to-result time under 5 h. The invalid rate of the BioCode RPP on initial testing was 1.0% (26/2,649).IMPORTANCE Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) is a high-throughput test that utilizes RT-PCR in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify 17 respiratory pathogens, including 14 viruses and 3 bacteria. This study summarizes data generated from a multicenter clinical trial evaluating the performance of the BioCode RPP on 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from five geographically distinct sites.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of a pathogen microarray for the analysis of viruses and bacteria in clinical diagnostic samples from pigs
    Jaing, Crystal J.
    Thissen, James B.
    Gardner, Shea N.
    McLoughlin, Kevin S.
    Hullinger, Pam J.
    Monday, Nicholas A.
    Niederwerder, Megan C.
    Rowland, Raymond R. R.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2015, 27 (03) : 313 - 325
  • [42] Nasopharyngeal Swabs vs. Nasal Aspirates for Respiratory Virus Detection: A Systematic Review
    Flynn, Matthew F.
    Kelly, Martin
    Dooley, James S. G.
    PATHOGENS, 2021, 10 (11):
  • [43] Sensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Saliva for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
    Jamal, Alainna J.
    Mozafarihashjin, Mohammad
    Coomes, Eric
    Powis, Jeff
    Li, Angel X.
    Paterson, Aimee
    Anceva-Sami, Sofia
    Barati, Shiva
    Crowl, Gloria
    Faheem, Amna
    Farooqi, Lubna
    Khan, Saman
    Prost, Karren
    Poutanen, Susan
    Taylor, Maureen
    Yip, Lily
    Zhong, Xi Zoe
    McGeer, Allison J.
    Mubareka, Samira
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 72 (06) : 1064 - 1066
  • [44] Multiplexed detection and identification of respiratory pathogens using the NxTAG® respiratory pathogen panel
    Gonsalves, Sarah
    Mahony, James
    Rao, Arundhati
    Dunbar, Sherry
    Juretschko, Stefan
    METHODS, 2019, 158 : 61 - 68
  • [45] Clinical Performance Evaluation of IRON-qPCR™ RV, a Novel Molecular POCT system, for the Qualitative Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Nasopharyngeal Swab
    Lee, C.
    Lee, J.
    Yang, B.
    Kim, T.
    Park, H.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 70 : I213 - I213
  • [46] Performance of Five Metagenomic Classifiers for Virus Pathogen Detection Using Respiratory Samples from a Clinical Cohort
    Carbo, Ellen C.
    Sidorov, Igor A.
    Van Rijn-Klink, Anneloes L.
    Pappas, Nikos
    van Boheemen, Sander
    Mei, Hailiang
    Hiemstra, Pieter S.
    Eagan, Tomas M.
    Claas, Eric C. J.
    Kroes, Aloys C. M.
    de Vries, Jutte J. C.
    PATHOGENS, 2022, 11 (03):
  • [47] Performance study of two rapid antigen detection methods in combined swabs and nasopharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Zubieta, Martin
    Rahhal, Marilina
    Valdi, Elba Mercedes
    Diaz, Rosa Viviana
    Mendoza, Diana Elizabeth
    Romero, Sergio Ezequiel
    Martinez, Debora Magali Garcia
    Aranzetti, Sebastian Nicolas
    ACTA BIOQUIMICA CLINICA LATINOAMERICANA, 2021, 55 (04): : 485 - 489
  • [48] Performance & clinical utility of oropharyngeal versus nasopharyngeal swabs in COVID-19
    Radhakrishnan, Suma
    Afsal, E. Muhammed
    Anitha, P. M.
    Perumbally, Hafees Abdullah
    Ajitha, B. K.
    Pulloor, Niyas Kudukkil
    Ali, K. P. Rafeeq
    Ajayan, K. V.
    Kanyadath, Anas Mohammed
    Verkoli, Anvar Sadath
    Sukumaran, Chinchu
    Nazeer, Hafeefa Abdul
    Sherif, Mohammed
    Navya, V.
    Nishitha, N. K.
    Sabir, V. T.
    Kottayi, Shakeeber
    Suchina, E. K.
    Thashreefa, T. K.
    Vaheed, K. Abdul
    Kulooth, Fathima
    Kumar, V. S. Suvanish
    Chandran, Praseeda
    Thekkedath, Usha
    Radhakrishnan, Chandni
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 156 (03) : 478 - 483
  • [49] Comparison of Nasal Swabs, Nasopharyngeal Swabs, and Saliva Samples for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other Respiratory Virus Infections
    Jung, Eun Ju
    Lee, Su Kyung
    Shin, Seon Hee
    Kim, Jin Soo
    Woo, Heungjeong
    Cho, Eun-Jung
    Hyun, Jungwon
    Kim, Jae-Seok
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 43 (05) : 434 - 442
  • [50] Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Different Types of Nasopharyngeal Swabs in Children
    Dube, Felix S.
    Kaba, Mamadou
    Whittaker, Elizabeth
    Zar, Heather J.
    Nicol, Mark P.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06):