ASO Visual Abstract: Change Impact of Body Composition during Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Pancreatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Takaichi, Shohei [1 ]
Tomimaru, Yoshito [1 ]
Kobayashi, Shogo [1 ]
Toya, Keisuke [1 ]
Sasaki, Kazuki [1 ]
Iwagami, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Yamada, Daisaku [1 ]
Noda, Takehiro [1 ]
Takahashi, Hidenori [1 ]
Asaoka, Tadafumi [1 ,2 ]
Tanemura, Masahiro [1 ,3 ]
Doki, Yuichiro [1 ]
Eguchi, Hidetoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Grad Sch Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Police Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[3] Rinku Gen Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Izumisano, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1245/s10434-022-13093-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The change impact of body composition during neoadjuvant therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between changes in body composition during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) and postoperative outcomes in patients with PDAC undergoing pancreatectomy, using three-dimensional images. Methods: We reviewed 66 consecutive patients with resectable/borderline resectable PDAC receiving gemcitabine and S-1 with radiotherapy between April 2010 and June 2016. Body compositions were evaluated pre- and post-NACRT. All patients were hospitalized and supplied with regulated diet during NACRT treatment. Results: Psoas major muscle volume index (PMI), abdominal fat volume index, and visceral fat volume index decreased significantly after NACRT (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, respectively). The post-NACRT CA19-9 level decreased significantly in the small-PMI-decrease group compared with the large-PMI-decrease group (P = 0.046). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the large-PMI-decrease group were significantly poorer than those of the small-PMI-decrease group (P = 0.002, P = 0.006, respectively). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in RFS and OS between groups with high and low PMI, at the point of either pre-NACRT (P = 0.117, P = 0.123, respectively) or post-NACRT (P = 0.065, P = 0.064, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified a large percentage decrease in PMI as an independent risk factor for recurrence and death (P = 0.003, P = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: Loss of skeletal muscle mass during NACRT was an independent risk factor for survival in patients with PDAC. © 2022, Society of Surgical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2471 / 2472
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes and prognostic impact of inflammatory nutritional factors during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
    Minoru Oshima
    Keiichi Okano
    Hironobu Suto
    Yasuhisa Ando
    Hideki Kamada
    Tsutomu Masaki
    Shigeo Takahashi
    Toru Shibata
    Yasuyuki Suzuki
    [J]. BMC Gastroenterology, 20
  • [22] Prognostic Factors in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Resection
    Ren, Weizheng
    Xourafas, Dimitrios
    Ashley, Stanley W.
    Clancy, Thomas E.
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (06) : 1172 - 1180
  • [23] Updates on adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment strategies for surgically resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Iyengar, Siddharth
    Nevala-Plagemann, Christopher
    Garrido-Laguna, Ignacio
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13
  • [24] Neoadjuvant Phase II Trial of Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Thanikachalam, Kannan
    Damarla, Vijay
    Seixas, Trevor
    Dobrosotskaya, Irina
    Wollner, Ira
    Kwon, David
    Winters, Kenneth
    Raoufi, Mohammad
    Li, Jia
    Siddiqui, Farzan
    Khan, Gazala
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 43 (06): : 435 - 441
  • [25] Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using CT Texture Analysis in Patients With Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Dewan, Rohit
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Seiser, Natalie
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    Singhi, Aatur D.
    Boone, Brian
    Bahary, Nathan
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    Lotze, Michael
    Zeh, Herbert J., III
    Tublin, Mitchell E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (02) : 362 - 369
  • [26] Is the Delphi's Oracle Pertinent to Patients With Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?
    Reni, Michele
    Macchini, Marina
    Orsi, Giulia
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (12) : 1851 - 1851
  • [27] Long-term survival of patients receiving multimodality neoadjuvant therapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    McCormick, Kinsey
    Whiting, Samuel H.
    Gyurkey, Grace
    Koh, Wui-Jin
    Sinanan, Mika
    Coveler, Andrew L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (03)
  • [28] Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine-based Accelerated Hyperfractionation Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Takeda, Yutaka
    Nakamori, Shoji
    Eguchi, Hidetoshi
    Kobayashi, Shogo
    Marubashi, Shigeru
    Tanemura, Masahiro
    Konishi, Koji
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Umeshita, Koji
    Mori, Masaki
    Doki, Yuichiro
    Nagano, Hiroaki
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 44 (12) : 1172 - 1180
  • [29] Letter to the editor: the nonnegligible effect of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Wang, Li
    Zhang, Xin
    Lu, Yanrong
    Tian, Bole
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (07) : 2340 - 2342
  • [30] Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment in a series of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Tinchon, Christoph
    Hubmann, Eva
    Pichler, Angelika
    Keil, Felix
    Pichler, Martin
    Rabl, Hans
    Uggowitzer, Martin
    Jilek, Kurt
    Leitner, Gerhard
    Bauernhofer, Thomas
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (06) : 1231 - 1234