Augmented reality for orthopedic and maxillofacial oncological surgery: a systematic review focusing on both clinical and technical aspects

被引:1
|
作者
Nasir, Naqash [1 ,2 ]
Cercenelli, Laura [3 ]
Tarsitano, Achille [1 ,4 ]
Marcelli, Emanuela [3 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Unit, Bologna, Italy
[2] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Lab Bioengn, eDIMES Lab, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Maxillofacial Surg Unit, Bologna, Italy
关键词
augmented reality; mixed reality; orthopedics oncology; maxillofacial oncology; surgery; tracking; MIXED REALITY; STEREOTACTIC NAVIGATION; TUMOR; RECONSTRUCTION; FEASIBILITY; PLACEMENT; RESECTION; ACCURACY; GUIDE; FLAP;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2023.1276338
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This systematic review offers an overview on clinical and technical aspects of augmented reality (AR) applications in orthopedic and maxillofacial oncological surgery. The review also provides a summary of the included articles with objectives and major findings for both specialties. The search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases and returned on 31 May 2023. All articles of the last 10 years found by keywords augmented reality, mixed reality, maxillofacial oncology and orthopedic oncology were considered in this study. For orthopedic oncology, a total of 93 articles were found and only 9 articles were selected following the defined inclusion criteria. These articles were subclassified further based on study type, AR display type, registration/tracking modality and involved anatomical region. Similarly, out of 958 articles on maxillofacial oncology, 27 articles were selected for this review and categorized further in the same manner. The main outcomes reported for both specialties are related to registration error (i.e., how the virtual objects displayed in AR appear in the wrong position relative to the real environment) and surgical accuracy (i.e., resection error) obtained under AR navigation. However, meta-analysis on these outcomes was not possible due to data heterogenicity. Despite having certain limitations related to the still immature technology, we believe that AR is a viable tool to be used in oncological surgeries of orthopedic and maxillofacial field, especially if it is integrated with an external navigation system to improve accuracy. It is emphasized further to conduct more research and pre-clinical testing before the wide adoption of AR in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy and Feasibility of Intraoperative Augmented Reality in Breast Cancer Surgery - A Systematic Review
    Khanna, Prerna
    Boland, Michael
    Amiras, Dimitri
    Joshi, Meera
    Leff, Daniel
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S502 - S503
  • [32] Letter To The Editor Regarding "Virtual and Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review"
    Silven, Manikon Poullay
    Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 181 : 204 - 205
  • [33] Intra-operative applications of augmented reality in glioma surgery: a systematic review
    Ragnhildstveit, Anya
    Li, Chao
    Zimmerman, Mackenzie H.
    Mamalakis, Michail
    Curry, Victoria N.
    Holle, Willis
    Baig, Noor
    Uguralp, Ahmet K.
    Alkhani, Layth
    Oguz-Uguralp, Zeliha
    Romero-Garcia, Rafael
    Suckling, John
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [34] Is the Use of Augmented Reality Assisted Surgery Beneficial in Urological Education: A Systematic Review
    Alzouebi, I. A.
    Green, S.
    Saad, S.
    Farmer, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 166 - 167
  • [35] Augmented Reality Implementation in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Future Application in Pulmonary Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Doornbos, Marie-Claire J.
    Peek, Jette J.
    Maat, Alexander P. W. M.
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    De Backer, Pieter
    Cornelissen, Bart M. W.
    Mahtab, Edris A. F.
    Sadeghi, Amir H.
    Kluin, Jolanda
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2024, 31 (06) : 646 - 658
  • [36] Review on Augmented Reality in Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: Toward "Surgery-Specific" Head-Up Displays
    Badiali, Giovanni
    Cercenelli, Laura
    Battaglia, Salvatore
    Marcelli, Emanuela
    Marchetti, Claudio
    Ferrari, Vincenzo
    Cutolo, Fabrizio
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 59015 - 59028
  • [37] Augmented Reality in Dentistry: Enhancing Precision in Clinical Procedures-A Systematic Review
    Puleio, Francesco
    Tosco, Vincenzo
    Pirri, Rosario
    Simeone, Michele
    Monterubbianesi, Riccardo
    Lo Giudice, Giorgio
    Lo Giudice, Roberto
    CLINICS AND PRACTICE, 2024, 14 (06) : 2267 - 2283
  • [38] DVT: a recent review and a taxonomy for oral and maxillofacial visualization and tracking based augmented reality: image guided surgery
    Alsadoon, Abeer
    AlSallami, Nada
    Rashid, Tarik A. A.
    Gosper, Jeff
    Prasad, P. W. C.
    Haddad, Sami
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (1) : 685 - 729
  • [39] The Development And Applications Of Augmented And Virtual Reality Technology In Spine Surgery Training: A Systematic Review
    Jung, Youngkyung
    Muddaluru, Varun
    Gandhi, Pranjan
    Pahuta, Markian
    Guha, Daipayan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 51 (02) : 255 - 264
  • [40] Is the use of augmented reality-assisted surgery beneficial in urological education? A systematic review
    Alzouebi, Ibraheem Alrishan
    Saad, Sanad
    Farmer, Tom
    Green, Sophie
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2021, 15 (03) : 148 - 152