Incorporating economy and water demand rate uncertainty into decision-making for agricultural water allocation during droughts

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Hu [1 ]
Liu, Ning [2 ]
Zhang, Danli [3 ]
Zhu, Jianzi [4 ]
Zhu, Yonghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Inst Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Shaanxi Inst Int Business, Higher Vocat Coll, Xian 712000, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shangluo Govt Peoples Republ China, Port Off, Shangluo 726000, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Xian Jiaotong Univ Xian, Sch Math & Stat, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
evapotranspiration; multi-objective particle swarm optimization; nexus; water supply; CROP MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; AQUACROP; RISK;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2023.236
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Determining sources of uncertainty in the agricultural water supply helps to increase irrigation scheduling accuracy. Among the most important sources of uncertainty parameters such as evapotranspiration, coefficient of sensitivity to water stress, cultivation costs, selling prices of products, and water allocated to plants. This study was conducted to estimate the fluctuations of the response due to the uncertainty of four parameters of soil moisture, water provided for cultivation, cost of cultivation during the growing season, and coefficient of sensitivity to drought. In the concept of water and food nexus, two basic factors, including increasing economic productivity and achieving maximum product production, are known as decision criteria. Therefore, mathematical modeling of net income and the ratio of actual and potential yield production has been prepared according to the four uncertain input variables of the problem. The proposed model has used a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm to estimate the best values of non-deterministic variables. The results of the uncertainty analysis showed that the range of changes in performance and net profit compared to the coefficient of sensitivity to water stress has different ranges and mechanisms and knowing the nature of each helps to improve the responses.
引用
收藏
页码:4252 / 4262
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Large-Scale Hydrological Modeling and Decision-Making for Agricultural Water Consumption and Allocation in the Main Stem Tarim River, China
    Yu, Yang
    Disse, Markus
    Yu, Ruide
    Yu, Guoan
    Sun, Lingxiao
    Huttner, Philipp
    Rumbaur, Christian
    WATER, 2015, 7 (06) : 2821 - 2839
  • [32] Stochastic model for crop water stress during agricultural droughts
    Mukherjee, Debdas
    ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2019, 1 (05)
  • [33] Decision-making tools for water resource allocation in the Pays de la Loire region
    Pedehour, Pauline
    LHB-HYDROSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2023, 109 (01)
  • [34] INCORPORATING DEMAND UNCERTAINTY IN WATER-SUPPLY HEADWORKS SIMULATION
    NG, WS
    KUCZERA, G
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1993, 29 (02) : 469 - 477
  • [35] Decision-Making Under Uncertainty and Demand for Health Insurance A Multidisciplinary Study
    Ottaviani, Cristina
    Vandone, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (02) : 80 - 85
  • [36] WATER-QUALITY SIMULATION MODELING AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT AND DECISION-MAKING
    RECKHOW, KH
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1994, 72 (1-2) : 1 - 20
  • [37] Modelling everything everywhere: a new approach to decision-making for water management under uncertainty
    Beven, Keith J.
    Alcock, Ruth E.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 : 124 - 132
  • [38] A spatial multi-objective decision-making under uncertainty for water resources management
    Simonovic, SP
    Nirupama
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2005, 7 (02) : 117 - 133
  • [39] Robust Linear Programming and Its Application to Water and Environmental Decision-Making under Uncertainty
    Zhou, Yang
    Yang, Bo
    Han, Jingcheng
    Huang, Yuefei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [40] Dealing with Uncertainty in Decision-Making for Drinking Water Supply Systems Exposed to Extreme Events
    Alessandro Pagano
    Irene Pluchinotta
    Raffaele Giordano
    Anna Bruna Petrangeli
    Umberto Fratino
    Michele Vurro
    Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 2131 - 2145