Imiquimod for Cervical and Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Inayama, Yoshihide
Takamatsu, Shiro
Hamanishi, Junzo [1 ]
Mizuno, Kayoko
Horinouchi, Noboru
Yamanoi, Koji
Taki, Mana
Murakami, Ryusuke
Yamaguchi, Ken
Kosaka, Kenzo
Efthimiou, Orestis
Kawakami, Koji
Furukawa, Toshiaki A.
Mandai, Masaki
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Grad Sch Med, Kyoto, Japan
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2023年 / 142卷 / 02期
关键词
TOPICAL IMIQUIMOD; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000005256
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment efficacy and the risk of adverse events of imiquimod for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN), compared with placebo or no intervention.DATA SOURCES: We searched Cochrane, PubMed, ISRCTN registry, , and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform up to November 23, 2022.METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials and prospective nonrandomized studies with control arms that investigated the efficacy of imiquimod for histologically confirmed CIN or VAIN. The primary outcomes were histologic regression of the disease (primary efficacy outcome) and treatment discontinuation due to side effects (primary safety outcome). We estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) of imiquimod, compared with placebo or no intervention. We also conducted a meta-analysis of the proportions of patients with adverse events in the imiquimod arms.TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Four studies contributed to the pooled OR for the primary efficacy outcome. An additional four studies were available for meta-analyses of proportions in the imiquimod arm. Imiquimod was associated with increased probability of regression (pooled OR 4.05, 95% CI 2.08-7.89). Pooled OR for CIN in the three studies was 4.27 (95% CI 2.11-8.66); results of one study were available for VAIN (OR, 2.67, 95% CI 0.36-19.71). Pooled probability for primary safety outcome in the imiquimod arm was 0.07 (95% CI 0.03-0.14). The pooled probabilities (95% CI) of secondary outcomes were 0.51 (0.20-0.81) for fever, 0.53 (0.31-0.73) for arthralgia or myalgia, 0.31 (0.18-0.47) for abdominal pain, 0.28 (0.09-0.61) for abnormal vaginal discharge or genital bleeding, 0.48 (0.16-0.82) for vulvovaginal pain, and 0.02 (0.01-0.06) for vaginal ulceration.CONCLUSION: Imiquimod was found to be effective for CIN, whereas data on VAIN were limited. Although local and systemic complications are common, treatment discontinuation is infrequent. Thus, imiquimod is potentially an alternative therapy to surgery for CIN.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 318
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NATURAL HISTORY OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA GRADE 2 UNDER ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Tainio, K.
    Athanasiou, A.
    Tikkinen, K.
    Aaltonen, R.
    Cardenas Hernandes, L.
    Glazer-Livson, S.
    Jakobsson, M.
    Joronen, K.
    Kiviharju, M.
    Louvanto, K.
    Oksjoki, S.
    Tahtinen, R.
    Virtanen, S.
    Nieminen, P.
    Kyrgiou, M.
    Kalliala, I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 25 - 25
  • [32] Analysis of related factors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia complicated with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Zhang, Y. Y.
    Xia, R.
    Chen, D.
    Zhang, X.
    [J]. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 (05): : 902 - 908
  • [33] Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer in imprisoned women worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Escobar, Nadia
    Plugge, Emma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 74 (01) : 95 - 102
  • [34] Human papillomavirus in breast cancer of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer history. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mareti, Evangelia
    Chatzakis, Christos
    Pratilas, Georgios-Chrysostomos
    Liberis, Anastasios
    Vavoulidis, Eleftherios
    Papanastasiou, Anastasios
    Dampali, Roxani
    Daniilidis, Angelos
    Zepiridis, Leonidas
    Dinas, Konstantinos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2021, 26 (03): : 707 - 713
  • [35] Spontaneous Regression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2: A Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jin
    Lu, Chun-xue
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2019, 84 (06) : 562 - 567
  • [36] Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cryotherapy in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Sauvaget, Catherine
    Muwonge, Richard
    Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 120 (03) : 218 - 223
  • [37] Physicians' Awareness, Attitudes, and Experiences Regarding Imiquimod Treatment of Vaginal and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Koeneman, Margot M.
    van de Sande, Anna J. M.
    van Beekhuizen, Heleen J.
    Gerestein, Kees G.
    van de Laar, Rafli
    Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M.
    Kruse, Arnold-Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2016, 20 (01) : 75 - 79
  • [38] Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with topical imiquimod
    Polterauer, S.
    Grimm, C.
    Natter, C.
    Rahhal, J.
    Hefler, L.
    Reinthaller, A.
    Speiser, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [39] Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tainio, Karoliina
    Athanasiou, Antonios
    Tikkinen, Kari A. O.
    Aaltonen, Riikka
    Cardenas Hernandes, Jovita
    Glazer-Livson, Sivan
    Jakobsson, Maija
    Joronen, Kirsi
    Kiviharju, Mari
    Louvanto, Karolina
    Oksjoki, Sanna
    Tahtinen, Riikka
    Virtanen, Seppo
    Nieminen, Pekka
    Kyrgiou, Maria
    Kalliala, Ilkka
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 360
  • [40] INFLUENCE OF AGE ON HISTOLOGIC OUTCOME OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA: RESULTS FROM A LARGE COHORT, SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bekos, C.
    Grimm, C.
    Joura, E.
    Horvat, R.
    Reinthaller, A.
    Polterauer, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 926 - 926