Dosing of lumbar spinal manipulative therapy and its association with escalated spine care: A cohort study of insurance claims

被引:2
|
作者
Anderson, Brian R. [1 ]
Whedon, James M. [2 ]
Herman, Patricia M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Palmer Coll Chiropract, Palmer Ctr Chiropract Res, Davenport, IA 52803 USA
[2] Southern Calif Univ Hlth Sci, Hlth Serv Res, Whittier, CA USA
[3] RAND Corp, RAND Ctr Collaborat Res Complementary & Integrat H, Santa Monica, CA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICAL-PRACTICE-GUIDELINES; CHIROPRACTIC CARE; PREDICTION RULE; DOSE-RESPONSE; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH-CARE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; TRENDS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0283252
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three distinct spinal manipulative therapy dose groups and escalated spine care by analyzing insurance claims from a cohort of patients with low back pain. Methods We compared three distinct spinal manipulative therapy dose groups (low = 1 SMT visits, moderate = 2-12 SMT visits, high = 13+ SMT visits), to a control group (no spinal manipulative therapy) regarding the outcome of escalated spine care. Escalated spine care procedures include imaging studies, injection procedures, emergency department visits, surgery, and opioid medication use. Propensity score matching was performed to address treatment selection bias. Modified Poisson regression modeling was used to estimate the relative risk of spine care escalation among three spinal manipulative therapy doses, adjusting for age, sex, retrospective risk score and claim count. Results 83,025 claims were categorized into 11,114 unique low back pain episodes; 8,137 claims had 0 spinal manipulative therapy visits, with the remaining episodes classified as low dose (n = 404), moderate dose (n = 1,763) or high dose (n = 810). After propensity score matching, 5,348 episodes remained; 2,454 had 0 spinal manipulative therapy visits with the remaining episodes classified as low dose (n = 404), moderate dose (n = 1,761), or high dose (n = 729). The estimated relative risk (vs no spinal manipulative therapy) for any escalated spine care was 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.38, 0.55, p <0.001), 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.53, 0.63, p <0.001), and 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.95, 1.13, p = 0.461) for low, moderate, and high dose spinal manipulative therapy groups, respectively. Conclusions For claims associated with initial episodes of low back pain, low and moderate dose spinal manipulative therapy groups were associated with a 55% and 42% reduction, respectively, in the relative risk of any escalated spine care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association between spinal manipulative therapy and lumbar spine reoperation after discectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Trager, Robert J.
    Gliedt, Jordan A.
    Labak, Collin M.
    Daniels, Clinton J.
    Dusek, Jeffery A.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [2] Association between spinal manipulative therapy and lumbar spine reoperation after discectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Robert J. Trager
    Jordan A. Gliedt
    Collin M. Labak
    Clinton J. Daniels
    Jeffery A. Dusek
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 25
  • [3] Three Patterns of Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Back Pain and Their Association With Imaging Studies, Injection Procedures, and Surgery: A Cohort Study of Insurance Claims
    Anderson, Brian R.
    McClellan, Steve W.
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 44 (09) : 683 - 689
  • [4] Association between cervical artery dissection and spinal manipulative therapy –a medicare claims analysis
    James M Whedon
    Curtis L Petersen
    Zhongze Li
    William J Schoelkopf
    Scott Haldeman
    Todd A MacKenzie
    Jon D Lurie
    BMC Geriatrics, 22
  • [5] Association between cervical artery dissection and spinal manipulative therapy -a medicare claims analysis
    Whedon, James M.
    Petersen, Curtis L.
    Li, Zhongze
    Schoelkopf, William J.
    Haldeman, Scott
    MacKenzie, Todd A.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Forces generated during spinal manipulative therapy of the cervical spine . A pilot study
    Kawchuk, G.
    Herzog, W.
    Hasler, E.
    MANUELLE MEDIZIN, 2006, 44 (02) : 113 - 116
  • [7] Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study
    Ishimoto, Y.
    Yoshimura, N.
    Muraki, S.
    Yamada, H.
    Nagata, K.
    Hashizume, H.
    Takiguchi, N.
    Minamide, A.
    Oka, H.
    Kawaguchi, H.
    Nakamura, K.
    Akune, T.
    Yoshida, M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 (10) : 1103 - 1108
  • [8] FORCES GENERATED DURING SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY OF THE CERVICAL-SPINE - A PILOT-STUDY
    KAWCHUK, GN
    HERZOG, W
    HASLER, EM
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1992, 15 (05) : 275 - 278
  • [9] Classification of High Intensity Zones of the Lumbar Spine and Their Association with Other Spinal MRI Phenotypes: The Wakayama Spine Study
    Teraguchi, Masatoshi
    Samartzis, Dino
    Hashizume, Hiroshi
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    Muraki, Shigeyuki
    Oka, Hiroyuki
    Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
    Kagotani, Ryohei
    Iwahashi, Hiroki
    Tanaka, Sakae
    Kawaguchi, Hiroshi
    Nakamura, Kozo
    Akune, Toru
    Cheung, Kenneth Man-Chee
    Yoshimura, Noriko
    Yoshida, Munehito
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [10] Association between lumbar spine kinematics and falls in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross-sectional study
    Wada, Takashi
    Kitsuda, Yuki
    Tanishima, Shinji
    Osumi, Michihiro
    Takeda, Chikako
    Osaki, Mari
    Nagashima, Hideki
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, : 1562 - 1568