Selection of a Forklift for a Cargo Company with Fuzzy BWM and Fuzzy MCRAT Methods

被引:5
|
作者
Ulutas, Alptekin [1 ]
Topal, Ayse [2 ]
Karabasevic, Darjan [3 ]
Balo, Figen [4 ]
机构
[1] Inonu Univ, Dept Int Trade & Business, TR-44000 Malatya, Turkiye
[2] Nigde Omer Halisdemir Univ, Dept Business, TR-51240 Nigde, Turkiye
[3] Univ Business Acad Novi Sad, Fac Appl Management Econ & Finance, Jevrejska 24, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[4] Firat Univ, Engn Fac, Dept METE, TR-23000 Elazig, Turkiye
关键词
forklift selection; fuzzy BWM; fuzzy MCRAT; MCDM; MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT; SYSTEM; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/axioms12050467
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Material handling is a cost-intensive operation for businesses. There are several alternative types of equipment for material handling, therefore it is important to select the best one among them to decrease the cost. As there are several different alternatives and criteria which are used to assess these alternatives, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques are useful to determine the optimal material handling equipment (MHE) for businesses. In this study, fuzzy BWM for determining weights of criteria and the fuzzy Multiple Criteria Ranking by Alternative Trace (MCRAT) method have been used for ranking forklift alternatives. This study's significance in the literature will be the creation of a novel fuzzy MCDM technique with the application of fuzzy MCRAT. Furthermore, there are relatively few studies employing the MCRAT approach in the literature; therefore, this study will provide additional data and outcomes from this method to the literature. The findings present that the forklift with the code FLT-3 performed the best, whereas the forklift with the code FLT-2 had the worst performance, according to the fuzzy MCRAT technique. According to the comparison analysis, the fuzzy MCRAT produced the same results as the fuzzy ARAS and had a few subtle differences to fuzzy MARCOS.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resilient Supplier Selection Based on Fuzzy BWM and GMo-RTOPSIS under Supply Chain Environment
    Gan, Jiawu
    Zhong, Shuqi
    Liu, Sen
    Yang, Dan
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2019, 2019
  • [42] Equipment selection based on two different fuzzy multi criteria decision making methods: Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR
    Alpay, Serafettin
    Iphar, Melih
    OPEN GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 10 (01): : 661 - 677
  • [43] Developing an integrated fuzzy credit rating system for SMEs using fuzzy-BWM and fuzzy-TOPSIS-Sort-C
    Pranith Kumar Roy
    Krishnendu Shaw
    Alessio Ishizaka
    Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 325 : 1197 - 1229
  • [44] Fuzzy methods for variable selection in operational risk management
    Cerchiello, Paola
    Giudici, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RISK, 2012, 7 (04): : 25 - 41
  • [45] A Fuzzy System for Combining Filter Features Selection Methods
    Cateni, Silvia
    Colla, Valentina
    Vannucci, Marco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 19 (04) : 1168 - 1180
  • [46] A Fuzzy System for Combining Filter Features Selection Methods
    Silvia Cateni
    Valentina Colla
    Marco Vannucci
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 19 : 1168 - 1180
  • [47] A comparison of hesitant fuzzy VIKOR methods for supplier selection
    de Oliveira, Mery Ellen Brandt
    Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues
    Galo, Nadya Regina
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 149
  • [48] Developing an integrated fuzzy credit rating system for SMEs using fuzzy-BWM and fuzzy-TOPSIS-Sort-C
    Roy, Pranith Kumar
    Shaw, Krishnendu
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 325 (02) : 1197 - 1229
  • [49] The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Cirovic, Goran
    Prentkovskis, Olegas
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2017, 9 (11):
  • [50] Green supplier selection in steel door industry using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy Moora methods
    Arslankaya, Seher
    Celik, Mirac Tuba
    EMERGING MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (04) : 357 - 369