The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare-A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
van der Voorden, Michael [1 ]
Sipma, Wim S. [2 ]
de Jong, Margriet F. C. [3 ]
Franx, Arie [1 ]
Ahaus, Kees C. T. B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Dept Hlth Serv Management & Org, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Nephrol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
value-based healthcare (VBHC); patient engagement; quality improvement; patient perspective; co-design; co-production; communication; MIXED METHODS RESEARCH; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144027
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: In recent years, Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) has been gaining traction, particularly in hospitals. A core VBHC element is patient value, i.e., what matters most to the patient and at what cost can this be delivered. This interpretation of value implies patient engagement in patient-doctor communication. Although patient engagement in direct care in the VBHC setting is well described, patient engagement at the organizational level of improving care has hardly been studied. This systematic reviewmaps current knowledge regarding the intensity and impact of patient engagement in VBHC initiatives. We focus on the organizational level of a continuous patient engagement model. Methods: We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines using five electronic databases. The search strategy yielded 1,546 records, of which 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. Search terms were VBHC and patient engagement, or similar keywords, and we included only empirical studies in hospitals or transmural settings at the organizational level. Results: We found that consultation, using either questionnaires or interviews by researchers, is the most common method to involve patients in VBHC. Higher levels of patient engagement, such as advisory roles, co-design, or collaborative teams are rare. We found no examples of the highest level of patient engagement such as patients co-leading care improvement committees. Conclusion: This study included 21 articles, the majority of which were observational, resulting in a limited quality of evidence. Our review shows that patient engagement at the organizational level in VBHC initiatives still relies on low engagement tools such as questionnaires and interviews. Higher-level engagement tools such as advisory roles and collaborative teams are rarely used. Higher-level engagement o ers opportunities to improve healthcare and care pathways through co-design with the people being served. We urge VBHC initiatives to embrace all levels of patient engagement to ensure that patient values find their way to the heart of these initiatives.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review
    Bianchim, Mayara Silveira
    Crane, Ellie
    Jones, Anwen
    Neukirchinger, Barbara
    Roberts, Gareth
    Mclaughlin, Leah
    Noyes, Jane
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (12):
  • [32] A Value-Based Steering Model for Healthcare
    Pitkanen, Laura J.
    Leskela, Riikka-Leena
    Tolkki, Helena
    Torkki, Paulus
    FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2021, 1
  • [33] Value-based healthcare in Lynch syndrome
    Hennink, Simone D.
    Hofland, Nandy
    Gopie, Jessica P.
    van der Kaa, Corinne
    de Koning, Kimberley
    Nielsen, Maartje
    Tops, Carli
    Morreau, Hans
    Cappel, Wouter H. de Vos Tot Nederveen
    Langers, Alexandra M. J.
    Hardwick, James C.
    Gaarenstroom, Katja N.
    Tollenaar, Rob A.
    Veenendaal, Roeland A.
    Tibben, Aad
    Wijnen, Juul
    van Heck, Magdalena
    van Asperen, Christi
    Roukema, Anne J.
    Hommes, Daan W.
    Hes, Frederik J.
    Vasen, Hans F. A.
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2013, 12 (02) : 347 - 354
  • [34] Value-based healthcare in the: United Kingdom
    Sackman, Jill E.
    Kuchenreuther, Michael J.
    Pharmaceutical Technology, 2015, 39 (01) : 26 - 76
  • [35] Value-based healthcare in Lynch syndrome
    Simone D. Hennink
    Nandy Hofland
    Jessica P. Gopie
    Corinne van der Kaa
    Kimberley de Koning
    Maartje Nielsen
    Carli Tops
    Hans Morreau
    Wouter H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel
    Alexandra M. J. Langers
    James C. Hardwick
    Katja N. Gaarenstroom
    Rob A. Tollenaar
    Roeland A. Veenendaal
    Aad Tibben
    Juul Wijnen
    Magdalena van Heck
    Christi van Asperen
    Anne J. Roukema
    Daan W. Hommes
    Frederik J. Hes
    Hans F. A. Vasen
    Familial Cancer, 2013, 12 : 347 - 354
  • [36] Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
    Sagen, Joachim Storen
    Smedslund, Geir
    Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth
    Habberstad, Andreas
    Kjeken, Ingvild
    Dagfinrud, Hanne
    Moe, Rikke Helene
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [37] Conceptualization and establishment of value-based healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A scoping review
    Hariri, Bayan A.
    Albagmi, Faisal M.
    Aljaffary, Afnan A.
    JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (04): : 835 - 846
  • [38] Value-Based Purchasing Design And Effect: A Systematic Review And Analysis
    Pandey, Abhinav
    Eastman, Diana
    Hsu, Heather
    Kerrissey, Michaela J.
    Rosenthal, Meredith B.
    Chien, Alyna T.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2023, 42 (06) : 813 - 821
  • [39] Value-based Healthcare: Can Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models be a Catalyst for Value-based Healthcare?
    Jayakumar, Prakash
    Nijhuis, Koen D. Oude
    Oosterhoff, Jacobien H. F.
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 481 (10) : 1890 - 1894
  • [40] Stakeholder management in value-based software development: systematic review
    Babar, Muhammad Imran
    Ghazali, Masitah
    Jawawi, Dayang N. A.
    Elsafi, Abubakar
    IET SOFTWARE, 2014, 8 (05) : 219 - 231