The immaturity of patient engagement in value-based healthcare-A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
van der Voorden, Michael [1 ]
Sipma, Wim S. [2 ]
de Jong, Margriet F. C. [3 ]
Franx, Arie [1 ]
Ahaus, Kees C. T. B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Dept Hlth Serv Management & Org, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Nephrol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
value-based healthcare (VBHC); patient engagement; quality improvement; patient perspective; co-design; co-production; communication; MIXED METHODS RESEARCH; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144027
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: In recent years, Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) has been gaining traction, particularly in hospitals. A core VBHC element is patient value, i.e., what matters most to the patient and at what cost can this be delivered. This interpretation of value implies patient engagement in patient-doctor communication. Although patient engagement in direct care in the VBHC setting is well described, patient engagement at the organizational level of improving care has hardly been studied. This systematic reviewmaps current knowledge regarding the intensity and impact of patient engagement in VBHC initiatives. We focus on the organizational level of a continuous patient engagement model. Methods: We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines using five electronic databases. The search strategy yielded 1,546 records, of which 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. Search terms were VBHC and patient engagement, or similar keywords, and we included only empirical studies in hospitals or transmural settings at the organizational level. Results: We found that consultation, using either questionnaires or interviews by researchers, is the most common method to involve patients in VBHC. Higher levels of patient engagement, such as advisory roles, co-design, or collaborative teams are rare. We found no examples of the highest level of patient engagement such as patients co-leading care improvement committees. Conclusion: This study included 21 articles, the majority of which were observational, resulting in a limited quality of evidence. Our review shows that patient engagement at the organizational level in VBHC initiatives still relies on low engagement tools such as questionnaires and interviews. Higher-level engagement tools such as advisory roles and collaborative teams are rarely used. Higher-level engagement o ers opportunities to improve healthcare and care pathways through co-design with the people being served. We urge VBHC initiatives to embrace all levels of patient engagement to ensure that patient values find their way to the heart of these initiatives.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost measurement in value-based healthcare: a systematic review
    Leusder, Maura
    Porte, Petra
    Ahaus, Kees
    van Elten, Hilco
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (12): : e066568
  • [2] Value-Based Healthcare Initiatives in Practice: A Systematic Review
    Zanotto, Bruna Stella
    Etges, Ana Paula Beck da Silva
    Marcolino, Miriam Allein Zago
    Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 66 (05) : 340 - 365
  • [3] Value-based healthcare delivery models in oncology: A systematic review
    Aviki, Emeline
    Schleicher, Stephen Matthew
    Mullangi, Samyukta
    Matsoukas, Konstantina
    Korenstein, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [4] Value-Based Healthcare From the Perspective of the Healthcare Professional: A Systematic Literature Review
    van Engen, Veerle
    Bonfrer, Igna
    Ahaus, Kees
    Buljac-Samardzic, Martina
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 9
  • [5] PRACTITIONER APPLICATION: Value-Based Healthcare Initiatives in Practice: A Systematic Review
    Komanduri, Pradipta
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 66 (05) : 365 - 366
  • [6] Value-Based Healthcare in Urology: A Collaborative Review
    Reitblat, Chanan
    Bain, Paul A.
    Porter, Michael E.
    Bernstein, David N.
    Feeley, Thomas W.
    Graefen, Markus
    Iyer, Santosh
    Resnick, Matthew J.
    Stimson, C. J.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Gershman, Boris
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (05) : 571 - 585
  • [7] The implementation of value-based healthcare: a scoping review
    van Staalduinen, Dorine J.
    van den Bekerom, Petra
    Groeneveld, Sandra
    Kidanemariam, Martha
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] The implementation of value-based healthcare: a scoping review
    Dorine J. van Staalduinen
    Petra van den Bekerom
    Sandra Groeneveld
    Martha Kidanemariam
    Anne M. Stiggelbout
    M. Elske van den Akker-van Marle
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [9] Placing patient safety at the heart of value-based healthcare
    La Regina, Micaela
    Federici, Lorenzo
    Bianco, Alessandra
    Tartaglia, Riccardo
    Lachman, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2024, 36 (03)
  • [10] Value-based Healthcare: Three Ways Healthcare Systems Can Get More Usage Out of Their Patient Engagement Tools
    Jayakumar, Prakash
    Duckworth, Elizabeth
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 479 (10) : 2136 - 2138