Image-based robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty allowed to match the rotation of the tibial implant with the native kinematic knee alignment

被引:12
|
作者
Favroul, Clement [1 ]
Batailler, Cecile [1 ,2 ]
Canetti, Robin [1 ]
Shatrov, Jobe [1 ,3 ]
Zambianchi, Francesco [4 ]
Catani, Fabio [4 ]
Servien, Elvire [1 ,5 ]
Lustig, Sebastien [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lyon Univ Hosp, Croix Rousse Hosp, FIFA Med Ctr Excellence, Orthopaed Surg & Sports Med Dept, Lyon, France
[2] Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Univ, Univ Lyon, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR T9406, F-69622 Lyon, France
[3] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Hornsby & Ku Ring Hosp, Sydney Orthopaed Res Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Azienda Osped Univ Modena, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Via Pozzo 71, I-41124 Modena, Italy
[5] Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Univ, Interuniv Lab Biol Mobil, LIBM EA 7424, Lyon, France
关键词
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Image-based robotic assisted system; Screw home mechanism; Implant rotation; Kinematic alignment; FOLLOW-UP; COMPONENT; MOVEMENT; ANATOMY; BEARING;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-022-05637-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Image-based robotic tools improve the accuracy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) positioning, but few studies have examined its effect on axial alignment. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of tibial and femoral implant positioning, mainly the tibial rotation, during medial or lateral UKA, performed with an image-based robotic assisted system. Methods A total of 71 UKA performed between September 2021 and June 2022 (53 medial and 18 lateral) were analyzed. All data regarding implant positioning (rotation, coronal and sagittal alignment) for tibial and femoral components were obtained using MAKO (R) software (Stryker (R), Mahwah, USA) intra-operatively. Results The lateral UKA had a mean internal tibial rotation of 15.4 +/- 3 degrees, a mean external femoral rotation of 0.96 +/- 2.4 degrees, and a mean tibial slope of 4.7 +/- 1.3 degrees. The medial UKA had a mean internal tibial rotation of 0.18 +/- 2.7 degrees, a mean internal femoral rotation of 0.35 +/- 2.2 degrees, and a mean tibial slope of 5.4 +/- 1.3 degrees. The tibial rotations, femoral valgus, tibial varus and tibial size significantly differed between medial and lateral UKA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in femoral rotation, flexion, femoral size, slope, and polyethylene thickness between medial and lateral UKA. Conclusion Medial and lateral UKA had significantly different implantation characteristics related to the biomechanics of the knee compartments. Image-based robotic UKA allowed precise femorotibial positioning per-operatively to match native kinematic alignment.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 526
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Image-based robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty allowed to match the rotation of the tibial implant with the native kinematic knee alignment
    Clément Favroul
    Cécile Batailler
    Robin Canetti
    Jobe Shatrov
    Francesco Zambianchi
    Fabio Catani
    Elvire Servien
    Sébastien Lustig
    International Orthopaedics, 2023, 47 : 519 - 526
  • [2] Image-based robotic (ROSA® knee system) total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty
    Eijking, Henriette M.
    Dorling, Isobel M.
    van Haaren, Emil H.
    Hendrickx, Roel
    Nijenhuis, Thijs
    Schotanus, Martijn G. M.
    Bouwman, Lee
    Most, Jasper
    Boonen, Bert
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [3] Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty with image-based and image-independent robotic support
    Ettinger, M.
    Tucking, L-R
    Savov, P.
    ORTHOPADE, 2020, 49 (07): : 604 - 610
  • [4] Individualized alignment in total knee arthroplasty using image-based robotic assistance
    Calliess, Tilman
    Ettinger, Max
    Savov, Peter
    Karkosch, Roman
    Windhagen, Henning
    ORTHOPADE, 2018, 47 (10): : 871 - 879
  • [5] Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Hernigou, P
    Deschamps, G
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (03): : 506 - 511
  • [6] Three-Dimensional Finite Analysis of the Optimal Alignment of the Tibial Implant in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Sasatani, Katsumi
    Majima, Tokifumi
    Murase, Kohei
    Takeuchi, Naoki
    Matsumoto, Takeo
    Oshima, Yasushi
    Takai, Shinro
    JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2020, 87 (02) : 60 - 65
  • [7] Rotational alignment of the tibial component affects the kinematic rotation of a weight-bearing knee after total knee arthroplasty
    Nakahara, Hiroyuki
    Okazaki, Ken
    Hamai, Satoshi
    Kawahara, Shinya
    Higaki, Hidehiko
    Mizu-uchi, Hideki
    Iwamoto, Yukihide
    KNEE, 2015, 22 (03): : 201 - 205
  • [8] Effect of tibial component alignment on knee kinematics and ligament tension in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Sekiguchi, K.
    Nakamura, S.
    Kuriyama, S.
    Nishitani, K.
    Ito, H.
    Tanaka, Y.
    Watanabe, M.
    Matsuda, S.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (03): : 126 - 135
  • [9] Implant and Limb Alignment Outcomes for Conventional and Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Valenzuela, Gustavo A.
    Jacobson, Nathan A.
    Geist, Derik J.
    Valenzuela, Richard G.
    Teitge, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (03): : 463 - 468
  • [10] Evaluation of implant position and knee alignment after patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Koeck, Franz Xaver
    Beckmann, Johannes
    Luring, Christian
    Rath, Bjoern
    Grifka, Joachim
    Basad, Erhan
    KNEE, 2011, 18 (05): : 294 - 299