Balanced crystalloid solutions versus normal saline in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Puze [1 ]
Huang, Yin [1 ]
Li, Jin [1 ]
Cao, Dehong [1 ]
Chen, Bo [1 ]
Chen, Zeyu [1 ]
Li, Jinze [1 ]
Wang, Ruyi [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Liangren [1 ]
机构
[1] West China Hosp Med, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Chengdu Univ, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Balanced crystalloid solutions; Intensive care units; Mortality; Renal-related outcomes; Meta-analysis; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY; RESUSCITATION; ASSOCIATION; METABOLISM; ACIDOSIS; CHOICE; ADULTS; MUSCLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-023-03570-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundIntravenous fluid therapy is important for pediatric and adult patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, medical professionals continue to struggle to determine the most appropriate fluids to obtain the best possible outcomes for each patient.ObjectiveWe conducted a meta-analysis involving cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the influence of balanced crystalloid solutions and normal saline among patients in ICUs.Patients and methodsStudies that compared balanced crystalloid solutions and saline in ICU patients from databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched up to July 25, 2022. The primary outcomes were mortality and renal-related outcomes, which included major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30), acute kidney injury (AKI), new receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT), maximum creatinine increasing, maximum creatinine level, and final creatinine level >= 200% of baseline. Service utilization including length of hospital stay, ICU stay, ICU-free days and ventilator-free days were also reported.ResultsA total of 13 studies (10 RCTs and 3 cohort studies) involving 38,798 patients in ICUs met the selection criteria. Our analysis revealed that each subgroup had no significant difference in mortality outcomes among ICU patients between balanced crystalloid solutions and normal saline. A significant difference was detected between the adult groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], [0.86, 1.00]; p = 0.04) indicating that the AKI in the balanced crystalloid solutions group was lower than that in the normal saline group. Other renal-related outcomes, such as MAKE30, RRT, maximum creatinine increasing, maximum creatinine level, and final creatinine level >= 200% of baseline showed no significant difference between the two groups. Regarding secondary outcomes, the balanced crystalloid solution group had a longer ICU stay time (WMD, 0.02; 95% CI, [0.01, 0.03]; p = 0.0004 and I-2 = 0%; p = 0.96) than the normal saline group among adult patients. Furthermore, children treated with balanced crystalloid solution had a shorter hospital stay time (WMD, - 1.10; 95% CI, [- 2.10, - 0.10]; p = 0.03 and I-2 = 17%; p = 0.30) than those treated with saline.ConclusionsCompared with saline, balanced crystalloid solutions could not reduce the risk of mortality and renal-related outcomes, including MAKE30, RRT, maximum creatinine increasing, maximum creatinine level, and final creatinine level >= 200% of baseline, but the solutions may reduce total AKI incidence among adult patients in ICUs. For service utilization outcomes, balanced crystalloid solutions were associated with a longer length of ICU stay in the adult group and shorter length of hospital stay in the pediatric group.
引用
收藏
页码:2829 / 2844
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ganapathy, Anusoumya
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    Spiegelman, Jamie
    Scales, Damon C.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (02)
  • [32] Efficacy of EWINDOW for prevention of delirium at intensive care units A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Jijie
    Wang, Jie
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (03) : E28598
  • [33] Catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Ramritu, Prabha
    Halton, Kate
    Cook, David
    Whitby, Michael
    Graves, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [34] Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Anusoumya Ganapathy
    Neill KJ Adhikari
    Jamie Spiegelman
    Damon C Scales
    Critical Care, 16
  • [35] Prevalence of pressure ulcer in Iran's intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akhkand, Shadi Sohrabi
    Seidi, Jamal
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Gheshlagh, Reza Ghanei
    NURSING PRACTICE TODAY, 2020, 7 (01): : 12 - 20
  • [36] Acetate- versus lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Ellekjaer, Karen Louise
    Perner, Anders
    Sivapalan, Praleene
    Moller, Morten Hylander
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 66 (07) : 782 - 794
  • [37] Effect of selective decontamination on antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Daneman, Nick
    Sarwar, Syed
    Fowler, Robert A.
    Cuthbertson, Brian H.
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 13 (04): : 328 - 341
  • [38] Nursing resources and patient outcomes in intensive care units A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Haiyan
    Ding, Jin
    Liu, Ying
    Zhang, Jiming
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (06) : E24507
  • [39] Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Markwart, Robby
    Saito, Hiroki
    Harder, Thomas
    Tomczyk, Sara
    Cassini, Alessandro
    Fleischmann-Struzek, Carolin
    Reichert, Felix
    Eckmanns, Tim
    Allegranzi, Benedetta
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 46 (08) : 1536 - 1551
  • [40] Prevalence and variability in use of physical restraints in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zare-Kaseb, Akbar
    Sarmadi, Sogand
    Sanaie, Neda
    Zeydi, Amir Emami
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2025, 38 (03)