Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of anal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo analyse the safety and effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in anal fistula patients.MethodsOnline databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 5, 2022, for eligible studies about evaluating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in treating anal fistula. Literature search, screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were carried out by two independent investigators. The overall cure rate, the complete cure rate, the recurrence rate, and the adverse event rate with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were the primary calculation indexes. Subgroup analyses were conducted primarily according to whether PRP was combined with other treatments. Softwares of MedCalc 18.2 and Review Manager 5.3 were used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 14 studies with 514 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall cure rate of 14 studies was 72.11% (95% CI 0.64-0.79). The cure rate of PRP alone was 62.39% (95% CI 0.55-0.69). The combined cure rate of PRP with other treatments was 83.12% (95% CI 0.77-0.88). The cure rate of interventions involving PRP were superior to the cure rate of surgery methods without using PRP significantly in the 4 randomized controlled studies (RR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.10-1.54, p = 0.002). The complete cure rate of the 8 studies was 66.37% (95% CI 0.52-0.79). The recurrence rate of the 12 studies was 14.84% (95% CI 0.08-0.24). The adverse event rate of the 12 studies was 6.31% (95% CI 0.02-0.12).ConclusionPRP showed favorable safety and effectiveness in the treatment of anal fistula, especially combined with other treatment procedures.