The social construction of systemic risk: towards an actionable framework for risk governance

被引:10
|
作者
Maskrey, Andrew [1 ]
Jain, Garima [2 ]
Lavell, Allan [3 ]
机构
[1] Risk Nexus Initiat, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Indian Inst Human Settlements, Bangalore, India
[3] FLACSO, San Jose, Costa Rica
关键词
Systemic risk; Risk governance; Social construction of risk; Sendai framework;
D O I
10.1108/DPM-07-2022-0155
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose- This paper explores the building blocks of risk governance systems that are equipped to manage systemic risk in the 21st century. Whilst approaches to risk governance have been evolving for more than a decade, recent disasters have shown that conventional risk management solutions need to be complemented with a multidimensional risk approach to govern complex risks and prevent major, often simultaneous, crises with cascading and knock-on effects on multiple, interrelated systems at scale. The paper explores which risk governance innovations will be essential to provide the enabling environment for sustainable development that is resilient to interrelated shocks and risks.Design/methodology/approach- This interdisciplinary literature review-based thought piece highlights how systemic risk is socially constructed and identifies guiding principles for systemic risk governance that could be actionable by and provide entry points for local and national governments, civil society and the private sector. particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), in a way that is relevant to the achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This considers preparedness, response and resilience, but more importantly prospective and corrective risk control and reduction strategies and mechanisms. Only when systemic risk is framed in a way that is relevant to the political agendas of countries will it be possible to begin a dialogue for its governance.Findings- The paper identifies opportunities at the global, national and local levels, which together draw up a viable framework for systemic risk governance that (1) embraces the governance of sustainability and resilience through a strengthened holistic governance framework for social, economic, territorial and environmental development; (2) improves managing conventional risk to ultimately manage systemic risks; (3) fosters the understanding of vulnerability and exposure to gain insight into systemic risk; (4) places a greater focus on prospective risk management; (5) manages systemic risk in local infrastructure systems, supply chains and ecosystems; (6) shifts the focus from protecting privatized gains to managing socialized risk.Originality/value- The choices and actions that societies take on the path of their development are contributing intentionally or unintentionally to the construction of systemic risks, which result in knock-on effects among interconnected social, environmental, political and economic systems. These risks are manifesting in major crises with cascading effects and a real potential to undermine the achievement of the SDGs, as COVID-19 is a stark reminder of. This paper offers the contours of a new risk governance paradigm that is able to navigate the new normal in a post-COVID world and is equipped to manage systemic risk.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 26
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Corporate governance and the systemic risk of financial institutions
    Iqbal, Jamshed
    Strobl, Sascha
    Vahamaa, Sami
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2015, 82 : 42 - 61
  • [22] Governance, Privatization, and Systemic Risk in the Disarticulated State
    Carboni, Julia L.
    Milward, H. Brinton
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2012, 72 : S36 - S44
  • [23] Systemic risks - concepts and challenges for risk governance
    Schweizer, Pia-Johanna
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2021, 24 (01) : 78 - 93
  • [24] Social tipping points and adaptation limits in the context of systemic risk: Concepts, models and governance
    Juhola, Sirkku
    Filatova, Tatiana
    Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan
    Mechler, Reinhard
    Scheffran, Juergen
    Schweizer, Pia-Johanna
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2022, 4
  • [25] Risk Governance for the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in Algeria
    Benouar, Djillali
    Belmokhtar, Amine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2025, 16 (01) : 58 - 70
  • [26] The social construction of menopause as risk
    Palmlund, I
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 18 (02): : 87 - 94
  • [27] A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning
    Renn, Ortwin
    Klinke, Andreas
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (05): : 2036 - 2059
  • [28] A Macroeconomic Framework for Quantifying Systemic Risk
    He, Zhiguo
    Krishnamurthy, Arvind
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2019, 11 (04) : 1 - 37
  • [29] A Framework for Assessing Organisational IT Governance, Risk and Compliance
    Vunk, Mikhel
    Mayer, Nicolas
    Matulevicius, Raimundas
    SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT AND CAPABILITY DETERMINATION, SPICE 2017, 2017, 770 : 337 - 350
  • [30] From governance contagion to risk contagion: research on systemic risk contagion from the perspective of governance externality
    Jia, Kaiwei
    Yin, Longhe
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2024, 12