Barriers for adoption of green supply chain management in cement industry: an interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach

被引:2
|
作者
Chotia, Varun [1 ]
Soni, Swati [1 ]
Jain, Girish [2 ]
Papa, Armando [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Jaipuria Inst Management, Jaipur Campus, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[2] Birla Inst Management Technol, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] HSE Univ, Moscow, Russia
[4] Univ Salerno, Dept Econ & Stat, Salerno, Italy
关键词
Green supply chain management; Cement; Interpretive structural modelling barriers; Supply chain management; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; MINING-INDUSTRY; GSCM PRACTICES; CHINA;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-023-05724-5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Cement is a critical sector aligned with government priorities of infrastructure and housing. The sector is extremely energy intensive and a major polluter, and thus a consciousness has started for greening the supply chain in order to address the concerns for environment. However, this is easier said than done, as there are many inherent challenges that act as deterrents in the implementation of green supply chain management (GSCM). The existing literature has a paucity of studies on barriers to implementation of GCSM in an emerging countries context, and there are practically no studies conducted on GSCM implementation in the cement industry in India. This is a huge gap and the authors thus conducted the current study for identifying, analyzing and prioritizing the most important barriers towards the implementation of GSCM in the cement industry. Review of extant literature and expert interviews led the authors to consider fourteen barriers that were organized under four categories. A method of mathematical modelling, interpretive structural modelling (ISM) has been applied to arrange the barriers in a hierarchical order. Four attributes have emerged as dependent barriers, five as driver barriers and five as linkage barriers. The findings suggest that lack of environmental performance metrics, high investment and low Return on Investment (ROI) proposition, lack of government policies to secure easy loans from commercial banks, fear of failure, inadequate CSR consciousness of top management and lack of strategic planning are barriers with highest driving power in the cement industry. The study offers immense practical implications for production processes and GSCM in the cement industry. Resolving the driving barriers may help organizations in a seamless integration of green concerns in their supply chains.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of barriers of sustainable supply chain management in electronics industry: An interpretive structural modelling approach
    Menon, Rakesh R.
    Ravi, V.
    CLEANER AND RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION, 2021, 3
  • [2] Analysis of the barriers for implementing green supply chain management (GSCM) Practices: An Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Approach
    Jayant, Arvind
    Azhar, Mohd
    12TH GLOBAL CONGRESS ON MANUFACTURING AND MANAGEMENT (GCMM - 2014), 2014, 97 : 2157 - 2166
  • [3] Modelling of barriers pertaining to implementation of green supply chain management using ISM approach
    Lamba, Neeraj
    Thareja, Priyavrat
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 43 : 9 - 16
  • [4] Barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation in Egyptian industries: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach
    Zayed, Esraa Osama
    Yaseen, Ehab A.
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2021, 32 (06) : 1192 - 1209
  • [5] Barriers of Green Supply Chain Management: An Analysis with Interpretive Structural Modeling
    Sun Mingbo
    Wang Weige
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS A-C, 2008, : 500 - 504
  • [6] Enablers and Barriers of Flexible Green Supply Chain Management: A Total Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach
    Shibin K.T.
    Gunasekaran A.
    Papadopoulos T.
    Dubey R.
    Singh M.
    Wamba S.F.
    Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2016, 17 (2) : 171 - 188
  • [7] Eco-design practices towards sustainable supply chain management: interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach
    Thamsatitdej P.
    Boon-itt S.
    Samaranayake P.
    Wannakarn M.
    Laosirihongthong T.
    International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2017, 10 (06) : 326 - 337
  • [8] AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO EVALUATE GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (GSCM) DRIVERS BY USING INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING (ISM)
    Rehman, Minhaj Ahemad Abdul
    Shrivastava, Rakesh L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 8 (02) : 315 - 336
  • [9] Drivers and barriers to green supply chain management in the South African cement industry
    Nteta, Ayanda
    Mushonga, Justine
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2021, 15
  • [10] Modelling the Barriers for Mass Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Indian Automotive Sector: An Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Approach
    Prakash, Surya
    Poudel, Sameer Sharma
    Dwivedy, Maheshwar
    Shrestha, Dilesh Raj
    2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2018, : 458 - 462