Barriers and facilitators of artificial intelligence conception and implementation for breast imaging diagnosis in clinical practice: a scoping review

被引:11
|
作者
Lokaj, Belinda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pugliese, Marie-Therese [1 ]
Kinkel, Karen [4 ]
Lovis, Christian [2 ,3 ]
Schmid, Jerome [1 ]
机构
[1] HES SO Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva Sch Hlth Sci, Delemont, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Med Informat Sci, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Reseau Hosp Neuchatelois, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Diagnostic imaging; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; AI; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10181-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveAlthough artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated promise in enhancing breast cancer diagnosis, the implementation of AI algorithms in clinical practice encounters various barriers. This scoping review aims to identify these barriers and facilitators to highlight key considerations for developing and implementing AI solutions in breast cancer imaging.MethodA literature search was conducted from 2012 to 2022 in six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINHAL, Embase, IEEE, and ArXiv). The articles were included if some barriers and/or facilitators in the conception or implementation of AI in breast clinical imaging were described. We excluded research only focusing on performance, or with data not acquired in a clinical radiology setup and not involving real patients.ResultsA total of 107 articles were included. We identified six major barriers related to data (B1), black box and trust (B2), algorithms and conception (B3), evaluation and validation (B4), legal, ethical, and economic issues (B5), and education (B6), and five major facilitators covering data (F1), clinical impact (F2), algorithms and conception (F3), evaluation and validation (F4), and education (F5).ConclusionThis scoping review highlighted the need to carefully design, deploy, and evaluate AI solutions in clinical practice, involving all stakeholders to yield improvement in healthcare.Clinical relevance statementThe identification of barriers and facilitators with suggested solutions can guide and inform future research, and stakeholders to improve the design and implementation of AI for breast cancer detection in clinical practice.Key Points & BULL; Six major identified barriers were related to data; black-box and trust; algorithms and conception; evaluation and validation; legal, ethical, and economic issues; and education.& BULL; Five major identified facilitators were related to data, clinical impact, algorithms and conception, evaluation and validation, and education.& BULL; Coordinated implication of all stakeholders is required to improve breast cancer diagnosis with AI.Key Points & BULL; Six major identified barriers were related to data; black-box and trust; algorithms and conception; evaluation and validation; legal, ethical, and economic issues; and education.& BULL; Five major identified facilitators were related to data, clinical impact, algorithms and conception, evaluation and validation, and education.& BULL; Coordinated implication of all stakeholders is required to improve breast cancer diagnosis with AI.Key Points & BULL; Six major identified barriers were related to data; black-box and trust; algorithms and conception; evaluation and validation; legal, ethical, and economic issues; and education.& BULL; Five major identified facilitators were related to data, clinical impact, algorithms and conception, evaluation and validation, and education.& BULL; Coordinated implication of all stakeholders is required to improve breast cancer diagnosis with AI.
引用
收藏
页码:2096 / 2109
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analyzing Barriers and Enablers for the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Innovations into Radiology Practice: A Scoping Review
    Eltawil, Fatma A.
    Atalla, Michael
    Boulos, Emily
    Amirabadi, Afsaneh
    Tyrrell, Pascal N.
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (04) : 1443 - 1455
  • [22] Implementation strategies, and barriers and facilitators for implementation of physical activity at work: a scoping review
    Anne Garne-Dalgaard
    Stephanie Mann
    Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup Bredahl
    Mette Jensen Stochkendahl
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 27
  • [23] Barriers and facilitators to implementation of APTA's breast cancer-related lymphedema diagnosis and intervention clinical practice guidelines
    Campione, Elizabeth
    Wampler, Meredith
    Bolch, Charlotte A.
    Krzak, Joseph J.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2025, 19 (01) : 397 - 406
  • [24] Organisational barriers and facilitators to the implementation of best practices within paediatric forensic radiographic practice - A scoping review
    MacGregor, F.
    Breckons, M.
    Swainston, K.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2024, 30 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [25] Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Effective Alcohol Control Policies: A Scoping Review
    Jankhotkaew, Jintana
    Casswell, Sally
    Huckle, Taisia
    Chaiyasong, Surasak
    Phonsuk, Payao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [26] Barriers and Facilitators to Aerobic Exercise Implementation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
    Moncion, Kevin
    Biasin, Louis
    Jagroop, David
    Bayley, Mark
    Danells, Cynthia
    Mansfield, Avril
    Salbach, Nancy M.
    Inness, Elizabeth
    Tang, Ada
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 44 (03): : 179 - 187
  • [27] Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review
    Han R.
    Acosta J.N.
    Shakeri Z.
    Ioannidis J.P.A.
    Topol E.J.
    Rajpurkar P.
    The Lancet Digital Health, 2024, 6 (05): : e367 - e373
  • [28] Erratum to: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini implants in clinical practice: a systematic review
    Reint Meursinge Reynders
    Laura Ronchi
    Luisa Ladu
    Nicola Di Girolamo
    Jan de Lange
    Nia Roberts
    Sharon Mickan
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [29] Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review
    Han, Ryan
    Acosta, Julian N.
    Shakeri, Zahra
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Topol, Eric J.
    Rajpurkar, Pranav
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 6 (05): : e367 - e373
  • [30] Barriers and facilitators for female practitioners in orthopaedic training and practice: a scoping review
    Freeman, Clara
    Evans, Rebecca
    Drever, Natalie
    White, Jordy
    Larkins, Sarah
    Morrey, Christopher
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025,