Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat [1 ]
Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua [1 ]
Woratanarat, Patarawan [1 ]
Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek [1 ]
Angsanuntsukh, Chanika [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed, 270 Rama VI Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
关键词
Tourniquet; Limb occlusion pressure; Recommended tourniquet pressure; Minor hand surgery;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-023-04000-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn minor hand surgery, tourniquet is typically inflated to 250 mmHg. The pressure may be too high and cause unnecessary adverse effects. Limb occlusion pressure plus safety margin or recommended tourniquet pressure (RTP), has been reported as optimal pressure to provide bloodless field in limb surgeries. This study aimed to compare the RTP with the standard tourniquet pressure of 250 mmHg in minor hand surgery.MethodsA double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted from July to December 2019 and June 2020 to May 2021. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: RTP and 250 mmHg with 3:1 ratio allocation. The outcomes were measurement of cuff pressure reduction, time to develop of tourniquet pain and discomfort, pain score, discomfort score, motionless and bloodless of operative field determined by the surgeon's satisfaction.ResultsA total of 112 patients were included, 84 were in RTP and 28 were in 250 mmHg group. Mean of tourniquet pressure was significantly lower in the RTP group (228.3 & PLUSMN; 17.2 mmHg) (P < 0.001). Even though, time to develop pain was not significantly different, the RTP group reported significantly less pain and discomfort, according to the pain score (P = 0.02) and discomfort score (P = 0.017). The RTP group provided better motionless field, while both groups equally created a bloodless field.ConclusionThe RTP significantly reduced tourniquet related pain and discomfort during minor hand surgeries. It provided better motionless operative field and adequate bloodless field. Therefore, the RTP should be considered as optimal tourniquet pressure for minor hand surgeries.Level of evidenceI.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical utilization of arterial occlusion pressure estimation method in lower limb surgery: effectiveness of tourniquet pressures
    Tuncali, Bahattin
    Boya, Hakan
    Kayhan, Zeynep
    Arac, Sukru
    Camurdan, Mehmet Ali Koray
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2016, 50 (02) : 171 - 177
  • [22] Standard Versus Individualized Blood Pressure Targets During Thrombectomy: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Espelund, Ulrick S.
    Valentin, Jan B.
    Eriksen, Christian F.
    Koch, Klaus U.
    Johnsen, Soren P.
    Blauenfeldt, Rolf A.
    Speiser, Lasse
    Simonsen, Claus Z.
    Rasmussen, Mads
    STROKE-VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2023, 3 (06):
  • [23] A randomized controlled trial of three different local anesthetic methods for minor hand surgery
    Lee, Sang Ki
    Kim, Woo-suk
    Choy, Won Sik
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 30 (01)
  • [24] Comparison of Low Pressure versus high Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rehman, Pir Muneeb
    Ahmad, Farhan
    Anis, Saad Bin
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 12 (04): : 1516 - 1518
  • [25] Influence of isoflurane on the diastolic pressure-flow relationship and critical occlusion pressure during arterial CABG surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Hinz, Jose
    Mansur, Ashham
    Hanekop, Gerd G.
    Weyland, Andreas
    Popov, Aron F.
    Schmitto, Jan D.
    Grune, Frank F. G.
    Bauer, Martin
    Kazmaier, Stephan
    PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [26] A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control
    Pierard, Luc A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (23): : 2293 - 2293
  • [27] A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control
    Wright, Jackson T., Jr.
    Williamson, Jeff D.
    Whelton, Paul K.
    Snyder, Joni K.
    Sink, Kaycee M.
    Rocco, Michael V.
    Reboussin, David M.
    Rahman, Mahboob
    Oparil, Suzanne
    Lewis, Cora E.
    Kimmel, Paul L.
    Johnson, Karen C.
    Goff, David C., Jr.
    Fine, Lawrence J.
    Cutler, Jeffrey A.
    Cushman, William C.
    Cheung, Alfred K.
    Ambrosius, Walter T.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (22): : 2103 - 2116
  • [28] Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Standard-of-care Dressings in Breast Surgery: A Pilot Study
    Chow, Oliver
    Graham, Susannah
    Ricciardello, Daniel
    Davies, Matthew
    Lajevardi, Sepehr
    Hussain, Gazi
    Deva, Anand K.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [29] Pneumatic tourniquet versus no tourniquet in transfemoral amputation – a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Anna Trier Heiberg Brix
    Tine Nymark
    Hagen Schmal
    Martin Lindberg-Larsen
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [30] Pneumatic tourniquet versus no tourniquet in transfemoral amputation - a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Brix, Anna Trier Heiberg
    Nymark, Tine
    Schmal, Hagen
    Lindberg-Larsen, Martin
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)