Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Ketamine, Magnesium Sulfate, and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:6
|
作者
Shafiee, Hamed [1 ]
Riahipour, Farahnaz [1 ]
Hormati, Ahmad [2 ]
Ahmadpour, Sajjad [3 ]
Habibi, Mohammad Amin [4 ]
Vahedian, Mostafa [5 ]
Aminnejad, Reza [6 ,7 ]
Saeidi, Mohammad [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Qom Univ Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Qom, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Clin Res Inst, Patient Safety Res Ctr, Orumiyeh, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Iranian Tissue Bank & Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Qom Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Epidemiol, Qom, Iran
[6] Qom Univ Med Sci, Shahid Beheshti Hosp, Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Qom, Iran
[7] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Anesthesiol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
GI endoscopy; sedation; patient satisfaction; magnesium sulfate; ketamine; midazolam; propofol; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; MODERATE SEDATION; COMBINATION; MIDAZOLAM; FENTANYL; OPIOIDS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.2174/1871527321666220831093652
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background Endoscopy provides valuable diagnostic information and intervention therapies for gastroenterologists. Therefore, various drugs have been used to induce sedation in patients undergoing endoscopy, whereas none have been considered preferred by endoscopists. In the current study, we decided to use the combination of magnesium sulfate, ketamine, and their synergistic effects for creating partial analgesia to increase the satisfaction of endoscopists and patients. Methods This study is a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial that investigates the sedative effect of ketamine, magnesium sulfate, and propofol in endoscopy. Patients were selected from individuals over 12 years old and with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status I or II. The study was performed on 210 patients classified as ASA (I have no underlying disease) or II (with underlying controlled disease). The whole group was relieved of pain through sedation according to Ramsay criteria, satisfaction with the operation, duration, recovery, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, and decreased oxygen saturation were compared. Results A total of 155 patients were enrolled in our study, including 51 patients (midazolam and propofol), 55 patients (midazolam and ketamine), and 49 patients (midazolam and ketamine and magnesium). The results showed that preoperative heart rate, intraoperative systolic blood pressure, intraoperative diastolic blood pressure, postoperative heart rate, postoperative systolic blood pressure, and postoperative heart rate were significantly different between the groups. Conclusion The satisfaction of the endoscopic was achieved to a great extent, mainly in the group receiving midazolam and propofol and in the group receiving midazolam and ketamine. In most cases, the satisfaction of the endoscopic was acceptable, and the low satisfaction of the endoscopic was more in the group receiving midazolam. Ketamine and magnesium were observed. The two compounds midazolam-ketamine, and midazolam-propofol, have a more favorable effect than the combination of midazolam, ketamine, and magnesium.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SKOPE-Study of Ketorolac vs Opioid for Pain after Endoscopy: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy
    Rosen, Geoffrey H.
    Hargis, Paige
    Murray, Katie S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (06): : 1528 - 1529
  • [42] Comparison of Midazolam Plus Propofol With Propofol Alone for Upper Endoscopy: A Prospective, Single Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial
    Lee, Jeung Eun
    Lee, Sang Kil
    Chung, Hyunsoo
    Park, Jun Chul
    Shin, Sung Kwan
    Lee, Yong Chan
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB222 - AB222
  • [43] The safety and efficacy of intravenous ketorolac in patients undergoing primary endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
    Moeller, Carl
    Pawlowski, Julius
    Pappas, Ana L.
    Fargo, Keith
    Welch, Kevin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2012, 2 (04) : 342 - 347
  • [44] The safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosylate combined with propofol in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial
    Wei, Ai
    Ma, Shijin
    Dou, Yuzhe
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Wu, Jianxiong
    Zhou, Shuzhi
    Deng, Yanfang
    Liu, Xinquan
    Li, Dongming
    Yang, Mengchang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [45] Azelnidipine and Amlodipine: A Comparison of Their Effects and Safety in a Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial in Chinese Essential Hypertensive Patients
    Zhao, Xiuli
    Wu, Feng
    Jia, Sanqing
    Qu, Peng
    Li, Huimin
    Zhao, Xingshan
    Cao, Bo
    Lin, Yiping
    Wang, Mulan
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2010, 32 (06) : 372 - 376
  • [46] Comparison Of Vasopressin Versus Epinephrine Effects in Survival of Patients with Asystole: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Study
    Farsi, D.
    Moghimi, J.
    Hafezimoghadam, P.
    Zare, M. A.
    Torabi, M.
    [J]. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 13 (08) : 592 - 593
  • [47] Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus propofol-ketamine for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in hepatic patients (a comparative randomized study)
    Algharabawy, Wael Sayed
    Abusinna, Rasha Gamal
    AbdElrahman, Tamer Nabil
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 37 (01): : 364 - 372
  • [48] Comparison of peritonsillar infiltration effects of ketamine and tramadol on post tonsillectomy pain: a double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Ayatollahi, Vida
    Behdad, Shekoufeh
    Hatami, Maryam
    Moshtaghiun, Hossein
    Baghianimoghadam, Behnam
    [J]. CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [49] Comparison of haloperidol and midazolam in restless management of patients referred to the Emergency Department: A double-blinded, randomized clinical trial
    Esmailian, Mehrdad
    Ahmadi, Omid
    Taheri, Mehrsa
    Zamani, Majid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 20 (09): : 844 - 849
  • [50] Preoperative immunonutrition in patients at nutritional risk: results of a double-blinded randomized clinical trial
    M Hübner
    Y Cerantola
    F Grass
    P C Bertrand
    M Schäfer
    N Demartines
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2012, 66 : 850 - 855