Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Ketamine, Magnesium Sulfate, and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:6
|
作者
Shafiee, Hamed [1 ]
Riahipour, Farahnaz [1 ]
Hormati, Ahmad [2 ]
Ahmadpour, Sajjad [3 ]
Habibi, Mohammad Amin [4 ]
Vahedian, Mostafa [5 ]
Aminnejad, Reza [6 ,7 ]
Saeidi, Mohammad [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Qom Univ Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Qom, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Clin Res Inst, Patient Safety Res Ctr, Orumiyeh, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Iranian Tissue Bank & Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Qom Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Epidemiol, Qom, Iran
[6] Qom Univ Med Sci, Shahid Beheshti Hosp, Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Qom, Iran
[7] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Anesthesiol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
GI endoscopy; sedation; patient satisfaction; magnesium sulfate; ketamine; midazolam; propofol; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; MODERATE SEDATION; COMBINATION; MIDAZOLAM; FENTANYL; OPIOIDS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.2174/1871527321666220831093652
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background Endoscopy provides valuable diagnostic information and intervention therapies for gastroenterologists. Therefore, various drugs have been used to induce sedation in patients undergoing endoscopy, whereas none have been considered preferred by endoscopists. In the current study, we decided to use the combination of magnesium sulfate, ketamine, and their synergistic effects for creating partial analgesia to increase the satisfaction of endoscopists and patients. Methods This study is a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial that investigates the sedative effect of ketamine, magnesium sulfate, and propofol in endoscopy. Patients were selected from individuals over 12 years old and with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status I or II. The study was performed on 210 patients classified as ASA (I have no underlying disease) or II (with underlying controlled disease). The whole group was relieved of pain through sedation according to Ramsay criteria, satisfaction with the operation, duration, recovery, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, and decreased oxygen saturation were compared. Results A total of 155 patients were enrolled in our study, including 51 patients (midazolam and propofol), 55 patients (midazolam and ketamine), and 49 patients (midazolam and ketamine and magnesium). The results showed that preoperative heart rate, intraoperative systolic blood pressure, intraoperative diastolic blood pressure, postoperative heart rate, postoperative systolic blood pressure, and postoperative heart rate were significantly different between the groups. Conclusion The satisfaction of the endoscopic was achieved to a great extent, mainly in the group receiving midazolam and propofol and in the group receiving midazolam and ketamine. In most cases, the satisfaction of the endoscopic was acceptable, and the low satisfaction of the endoscopic was more in the group receiving midazolam. Ketamine and magnesium were observed. The two compounds midazolam-ketamine, and midazolam-propofol, have a more favorable effect than the combination of midazolam, ketamine, and magnesium.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine vs ketamine vs midazolam combined with propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy for cancer patients: A randomized double-blinded trial
    Shehab, Nahla N.
    Elsabeeny, Walaa Y.
    Abed, Sayed M.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 39 (01): : 511 - 517
  • [2] Comparison of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and propofol as an optimal sedative for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A randomized controlled trial
    Samson, Sumanth
    George, Sagiev Koshy
    Vinoth, B.
    Khan, Mohd Saif
    Akila, Bridgitte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 5 (02) : 51 - 57
  • [3] Effect of tranexamic acid on the treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial
    Bashiri, Homayoon
    Hamzeii, Mehdi
    Bozorgomid, Arezoo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACUTE DISEASE, 2021, 10 (02) : 57 - 61
  • [4] Comparison of ketofol (ketamine and propofol) and etomidate in electro convulsive therapy: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Joshi, Chhaya P.
    Thapisrija
    Ayyanagouda, Basavaraja
    Mutalik, Narayan
    Hulakund, Shivanand Y.
    Jalapati, Harini
    [J]. INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2021, 22 (01): : 73 - 78
  • [5] Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine/Ketamine with Propofol/Fentanyl for Sedation in Colonoscopy Patients: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Aminnejad, Reza
    Hormati, Ahmad
    Shafiee, Hamed
    Alemi, Faezeh
    Hormati, Maryam
    Saeidi, Mohammad
    Ahmadpour, Sajjad
    Sabouri, Seyed Mahdi
    Aghaali, Mohammad
    [J]. CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2022, 21 (08) : 724 - 731
  • [6] Randomized, Double-Blinded, Clinical Trial of Propofol, 1:1 Propofol/Ketamine, and 4:1 Propofol/Ketamine for Deep Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Miner, James R.
    Moore, Johanna C.
    Austad, Erin J.
    Plummer, David
    Hubbard, Laura
    Gray, Richard O.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 65 (05) : 479 - 488
  • [7] Effect of intravenous lidocaine on propofol consumption in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
    Li, Meizhen
    Ke, Weiqi
    Zhuang, Shaohui
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Effect of intravenous lidocaine on propofol consumption in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
    Meizhen Li
    Weiqi Ke
    Shaohui Zhuang
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [9] Propofol-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine-ketamine for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Amer, Akram M.
    Youssef, Azza M.
    El-Ozairy, Hala S.
    El-Hennawy, Ahmed M.
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2020, 70 (06): : 620 - 626
  • [10] A comparison of ketamine and lidocaine spray with propofol for the insertion of laryngeal mask airway in children: A double-blinded Randomized trial
    Bahk, JH
    Sung, JH
    Jang, IJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (06): : 1586 - 1589