Surgical peri-implantitis treatment with and without guided bone regeneration. A randomized controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Heitz, Fritz [3 ]
Koong, Bernard [4 ]
Huang, Tom [4 ]
Chivers, Paola [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Human Anat & Biol, Int Res Collaborat, Oral Hlth & Equ, Crawley, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Dent, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Perth Periodontal Specialists, West Leederville, WA, Australia
[4] Envis Med Imaging, Wembley, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Notre Dame, Inst Hlth Res, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[6] ECU, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
关键词
bone grafting; bone regeneration; clinical trials; patient reported outcome measures; peri-implantitis; randomized controlled trial; surgical procedures; RESORBABLE MEMBRANE; THERAPY; SUBSTITUTE; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14116
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of reconstructive peri-implantitis treatment.Materials and Methods: Forty participants, with peri-implantitis and a contained intraosseous defect, were randomized to access flap (control) or access flap with xenograft and collagen membrane (test). All received systemic antimicrobials. Blinded examiners recorded probing depths (PD), bleeding and suppuration on probing (BOP & SOP), soft tissue levels, and marginal bone levels (MBL) at baseline and 12 months. Patient reported outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was PD change.Results: All 40 participants (40 implants) completed the 12-month study. The mean (standard deviation) PD reduction (deepest site) was 4.2 (1.8) mm in the control and 3.7 (1.9) mm in the test group. MBL gain (deepest site) was 1.7 (1.6) mm in the control and 2.4 (1.4) mm in the test group. Absence of BOP & SOP was observed at 60% of both control and test implants. Buccal recession was 0.9 (1.6) mm in the control and 0.4 (1.1) mm in the test group. A successful outcome (absence of PD & GE; 5 mm with BOP, absence of SOP and absence of progressive bone loss) was achieved for 90% of the control and 85% of test group implants. No statistically significant differences in clinical or radiographic parameters were found between treatment groups. 30% of participants experienced mild gastro-intestinal disturbances. Reporting followed CONSORT guidelines.Conclusion: Similar clinical and radiographic improvements at 12 months were observed with high levels of patient satisfaction for both the access flap and xenograft covered by collagen membrane groups.Registered clinical . ID:NCT03163602 (23/05/2017).
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 910
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using a bone substitute with or without a resorbable membrane:: a prospective cohort study
    Roos-Jansaker, Ann-Marie
    Renvert, Helena
    Lindahl, Christel
    Renvert, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2007, 34 (07) : 625 - 632
  • [42] Assessment of titanium release following non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment: A randomized clinical trial
    Daubert, Diane
    Lee, Eddie
    Botto, Antonella
    Eftekhar, Mojdeh
    Palaiologou, Archontia
    Kotsakis, Georgios A.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 94 (09) : 1122 - 1132
  • [43] Effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in open flap debridement in the treatment of peri-implantitis: A randomized controlled trial
    Albaker, Abdulaziz M.
    ArRejaie, Aws S.
    Alrabiah, Mohammed
    Al-Aali, Khulud Abdulrahman
    Mokeem, Sameer
    Alasqah, Mohammed N.
    Vohra, Fahim
    Abduljabbar, Tariq
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2018, 23 : 71 - 74
  • [44] Efficiency of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of peri-implantitis - A three-month randomized controlled clinical trial
    Rakasevic, Dragana
    Lazic, Zoran
    Rakonjac, Bojan
    Soldatovic, Ivan
    Jankovic, Sasa
    Magic, Marko
    Aleksic, Zoran
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2016, 144 (9-10) : 478 - 484
  • [45] Management of Retrograde Peri-Implantitis by Apical Resection and Guided Bone Regeneration in Adjacent Maxillary Implants
    Thompson-Sloan, Tamika N.
    Kolhatkar, Shilpa
    Bhola, Monish
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2012, 2 (04): : 250 - 255
  • [46] Sulcus fluid bone marker levels and the outcome of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis
    Wohlfahrt, Johan C.
    Aass, Anne M.
    Granfeldt, Finn
    Lyngstadaas, Stale P.
    Reseland, Janne E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 41 (04) : 424 - 431
  • [47] The systemic impact of non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with or without adjunctive systemic metronidazole: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial
    Linares, Antonio
    Dopico, Jose
    Blanco, Carlota
    Pico, Alex
    Sobrino, Tomas
    Blanco, Juan
    Leira, Yago
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [48] Adjunctives in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis
    Reena Wadia
    British Dental Journal, 2023, 234 (10) : 757 - 757
  • [49] Advanced peri-implantitis cases with radical surgical treatment
    McCrea, Shane J. J.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 44 (01): : 39 - 47
  • [50] One alternative surgical treatment of retrograde peri-implantitis
    Hoffman, Matthew J.
    Hale, Demetria D.
    Hale, Kenneth L.
    FRONTIERS IN DENTAL MEDICINE, 2022, 3