Evaluation of the cutting force, burr formation, and surface quality during the machining of carbon nanoparticle modified polymer composites for structural applications

被引:9
|
作者
Kesarwani, Shivi [1 ]
Verma, Rajesh Kumar [2 ]
Jayswal, S. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Madan Mohan Malaviya Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Gorakhpur 273010, India
[2] Harcourt Butler Tech Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Kanpur 208002, India
来源
关键词
CFRP; rGO nanofiller; Nanocomposite; Drilling; Thrust force; Burr formation; FIBER-REINFORCED POLYMERS; CFRP COMPOSITES; HOLE QUALITY; DELAMINATION; MACHINABILITY; GRAPHENE; DAMAGE; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; ANGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105375
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The damages and imperfections in the drilled holes might cause excessive strains on the rivet and lead to as-sembly failure. One of the most common forms of damage in machined Carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) composites is the burr formation and irregular machined surface. This current study investigates the effect of different loading of reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) nanoflakes in modified CFRPs on the quality indices of drilled holes, including burr formation at the exit, surface roughness, and cutting forces. The Box-Behnken experimental design (BBD) was employed to conduct the drilling investigation on rGO-modified CFRP (CF/rGO) nano-composite. The samples were prepared at three different (0.5,1.0,1.5%) weight fractions of rGO nanofiller ma-terial, and the effect of varying parameters, like drilling speed and feed rate was investigated. Digital image processing (DIP) was utilized to examine the factors contributing to burr formation at the exit of drilled holes, as measured by the Burr Area Factor (BAF). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the rGO wt% and feed rate is the most prominent parameter while the drilling process. The optimal parametric condition was obtained as rGO wt% = 1.0%, Drill speed = 1800 rpm, and feed rate = 60 mm/min, while the optimum responses resulted in Thrust force = 36.716 N, Torque = 0.181 Nm, Surface Roughness = 1.120 mu m, and Burr area factor = 0.108. In addition, these results demonstrated that a moderate rGO wt% loading, a higher drill speed, and a lower feed rate could produce the minimal Thrust force, Torque, Surface Roughness, and Burr area factor simultaneously. Further, the Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) findings were used to evaluate the outcomes of the optimum setting.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Analysis of Tool Wear, Cutting Force, Surface Roughness and Machining Temperature During Finishing Operation of Ultrasonic Assisted Milling (UAM) of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic (CFRP)
    Abd Halim, Nor Farah Huda
    Ascroft, Helen
    Barnes, Stuart
    ADVANCES IN MATERIAL & PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE, 2017, 184 : 185 - 191
  • [22] Formation of a Hardened Surface Layer in Gears from a Gear Train Made of Structural St3 Carbon Steel during Laser Cutting
    I. V. Minaev
    A. E. Gvozdev
    A. G. Kolmakov
    A. N. Sergeev
    S. N. Kutepov
    D. S. Klement’ev
    I. V. Golyshev
    Russian Metallurgy (Metally), 2023, 2023 : 1516 - 1521
  • [23] Formation of a Hardened Surface Layer in Gears from a Gear Train Made of Structural St3 Carbon Steel during Laser Cutting
    Minaev, I. V.
    Gvozdev, A. E.
    Kolmakov, A. G.
    Sergeev, A. N.
    Kutepov, S. N.
    Klement'ev, D. S.
    Golyshev, I. V.
    RUSSIAN METALLURGY, 2023, 2023 (10): : 1516 - 1521
  • [24] Surface Quality Evaluation of 3D-Printed Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced PETG Polymer During Turning: Experimental Analysis, ANN Modeling and Optimization
    Tzotzis, Anastasios
    Nedelcu, Dumitru
    Mazurchevici, Simona-Nicoleta
    Kyratsis, Panagiotis
    Polymers, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [25] Multi-objective Optimization of Kerf-taper and Surface-roughness Quality Characteristics for Cutting-operation On Coir and Carbon Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Polymeric Composites During CO2-Pulsed Laser-cutting Using RSM
    Singh Y.
    Singh J.
    Sharma S.
    Aggarwal V.
    Pruncu C.I.
    Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2021, 8 (02) : 157 - 182