Heterogeneity of surrogate outcome measures used in critical care studies: A systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Verghis, Rejina [1 ]
Blackwood, Bronagh [1 ]
McDowell, Cliona [2 ]
Toner, Philip [1 ]
Hadfield, Daniel [3 ]
Gordon, Anthony C. [4 ]
Clarke, Mike [5 ]
McAuley, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Med Dent & Biomed Sci, Wellcome Wolfson Inst Expt Med, Belfast BT9 7BL, North Ireland
[2] Northern Ireland Clin Trials Unit, Belfast, North Ireland
[3] Kings Coll Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Crit Care Unit, London, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, Div Anaesthet Pain Med & Intens Care, London, England
[5] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Med Dent & Biomed Sci, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, North Ireland
关键词
Clinical trials; critical care; outcomes; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ARRHYTHMIA SUPPRESSION TRIAL; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED MULTICENTER; ARGININE HYDROCHLORIDE 546C88; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; DOUBLE-BLIND; NITRIC-OXIDE; SEPTIC SHOCK; ILL PATIENTS;
D O I
10.1177/17407745231151842
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The choice of outcome measure is a critical decision in the design of any clinical trial, but many Phase III clinical trials in critical care fail to detect a difference between the interventions being compared. This may be because the surrogate outcomes used to show beneficial effects in early phase trials (which informed the design of the subsequent Phase III trials) are not valid guides to the differences between the interventions for the main outcomes of the Phase III trials. We undertook a systematic review (1) to generate a list of outcome measures used in critical care trials, (2) to determine the variability in the outcome reporting in the respiratory subgroup and (3) to create a smaller list of potential early phase endpoints in the respiratory subgroup. Methods: Data related to outcomes were extracted from studies published in the six top-ranked critical care journals between 2010 and 2020. Outcomes were classified into subcategories and categories. A subset of early phase endpoints relevant to the respiratory subgroup was selected for further investigation. The variability of the outcomes and the variability in reporting was investigated. Results: A total of 6905 references were retrieved and a total of 294 separate outcomes were identified from 58 studies. The outcomes were then classified into 11 categories and 66 subcategories. A subset of 22 outcomes relevant for the respiratory group were identified as potential early phase outcomes. The summary statistics, time points and definitions show the outcomes are analysed and reported in different ways. Conclusion: The outcome measures were defined, analysed and reported in a variety of ways. This creates difficulties for synthesising data in systematic reviews and planning definitive trials. This review once again highlights an urgent need for standardisation and validation of surrogate outcomes reported in critical care trials. Future work should aim to validate and develop a core outcome set for surrogate outcomes in critical care trials.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:307 / 318
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes and measures of delirium interventional studies in palliative care to inform a core outcome set: A systematic review
    Agar, Meera R.
    Siddiqi, Najma
    Hosie, Annmarie
    Boland, Jason W.
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    Featherstone, Imogen
    Lawlor, Peter G.
    Bush, Shirley H.
    Page, Valerie
    Amgarth-Duff, Ingrid
    Garcia, Maja
    Disalvo, Domenica
    Rose, Louise
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (10) : 1761 - 1775
  • [32] A comparison of palliative care outcome measures used to assess the quality of palliative care provided in long-term care facilities: a systematic review
    Parker, Deborah
    Hodgkinson, Brent
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 25 (01) : 5 - 20
  • [33] Nurses' burnout and quality of life: A systematic review and critical analysis of measures used
    Khatatbeh, Haitham
    Pakai, Annamaria
    Al-Dwaikat, Tariq
    Onchonga, David
    Amer, Faten
    Premusz, Viktoria
    Olah, Andras
    NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (03): : 1564 - 1574
  • [34] A systematic search and critical review of studies evaluating psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for schizophrenia
    Buck, Benjamin
    Gagen, Emily C.
    Halverson, Tate F.
    Nagendra, Arundati
    Ludwig, Kelsey A.
    Fortney, John C.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2022, 147 : 13 - 23
  • [35] Palliative care outcome measures used in head and neck cancer: A scoping review
    Sriram, Shreya
    Xie, Deborah
    Gersten, Rebecca A.
    Gourin, Christine G.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024,
  • [36] A Systematic Review of the Outcome Measures Used to Evaluate Interprofessional Learning by Health Care Professional Students During Clinical Experiences
    Guitar, Nicole A.
    Connelly, Denise M.
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2021, 44 (03) : 293 - 311
  • [37] A set of traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcome measures for clinical research: Systematic review and critical examination of outcome measures
    Chung, Pearl
    Khan, Fary
    BRAIN INJURY, 2014, 28 (5-6) : 744 - 744
  • [38] How are surrogate outcomes defined in critical care trials? Preliminary results of a systematic review
    Verghis, Rejina
    Blackwood, Bronagh
    McDowell, Cliona
    Hadfield, Daniel
    Toner, Philip
    Fitzgerald, Marianne.
    Mcauley, Daniel F.
    Clarke, Mike
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [39] Outcome measures in haemophilia: a systematic review
    Boehlen, Francoise
    Graf, Lukas
    Berntorp, Erik
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2014, 93 : 2 - 15
  • [40] A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcome Measures Used in Circular Frame Fixation
    Antonios, Tony
    Barker, Amy
    Ibrahim, Inji
    Scarsbrook, Christine
    Smitham, Peter J.
    Goodier, W. David
    Calder, Peter R.
    STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION, 2019, 14 (01) : 34 - 44