Administrative Improbity and the Notion of Permitted and Prohibited Risks

被引:0
|
作者
Fortini, Cristiana [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Motta, Fabricio [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Fac Direito, Mestrado Doutorado & Grad, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Fac Milton Campos, Nova Lima, MG, Brazil
[3] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[4] Univ Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[5] Inst Brasileiro Direito Adm IBDA, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[6] Inst Brasileiro Direito Sancionatorio IDASAN, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[7] Inst Brasileiro Estudos Infraestrutura IBEJI, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[8] Univ Fed Goias, Goiania, GO, Brazil
[9] Univ Fed Goias, Fac Direito, Programa Mestrado Profiss Direito & Polit Publ, Goiania, GO, Brazil
[10] Inst Brasileiro Direito Adm, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
关键词
Administrative dishonesty. Illegality. Right to error;
D O I
10.9732/2023.V127.1135
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article intends to investigate the distinction between an act of administrative improbity and a merely illegal act. To this end, it will delve deeper into the notions specific to Criminal Law, embodied in the conception of permitted risks and prohibited risks. The administrator's right to error will also be addressed. At the end, final considerations will be made, as a form of conclusion about the context investigated, in which it will be possible to verify the possibility of the applicability of such theories also in the context of administrative improbity. The methodology of the study, inserted in the dogmatic legal aspect, is based on the study of bibliography, legislation and jurisprudential understandings on the topic.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 122
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条