Comparison between random forest and support vector machine algorithms for LULC classification

被引:61
|
作者
Avci, Cengiz [1 ]
Budak, Muhammed [1 ]
Yagmur, Nur [1 ]
Balcik, Filiz Bektas [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Remote sensing; Supervised Classification; Random Forest; Support Vector Machine; Wetland; LAND-COVER;
D O I
10.26833/ijeg.987605
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Nowadays, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely chosen for classifying satellite images for mapping Earth's surface. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) stand out among these algorithms with their accurate results in the literature. The aim of this study is to analyze the performances of these algorithms on land use and land cover (LULC) classification, especially wetlands which have significant ecological functions. For this purpose, Sentinel-2 satellite image, which is freely provided by European Space Agency (ESA), was used to monitor not only the open surface water body but also around Marmara Lake. The performance evaluation was made with the increasing number of the training dataset. 3 different training datasets having 10, 15, and 20 areas of interest (AOI) per class, respectively were used for the classification of the satellite images acquired in 2015 and 2020. The most accurate results were obtained from the classification with RF algorithm and 20 AOIs. According to obtained results, the change detection analysis of Marmara Lake was investigated for possible reasons. Whereas the water body and wetland have decreased more than 50% between 2015 and 2020, crop sites have increased approximately 50%.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of extreme learning machine with support vector machine for text classification
    Liu, Y
    Loh, HT
    Tor, SB
    INNOVATIONS IN APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2005, 3533 : 390 - 399
  • [32] Comparison of random forest, artificial neural networks and support vector machine for intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery
    Han, Te
    Jiang, Dongxiang
    Zhao, Qi
    Wang, Lei
    Yin, Kai
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2018, 40 (08) : 2681 - 2693
  • [33] An empirical comparison of ensemble classification algorithms with support vector machines
    Hu, ZH
    Li, YG
    Cai, YZ
    Xu, XM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 3520 - 3523
  • [34] Comparison of Damage Classification Between Recursive Bayesian Model Selection and Support Vector Machine
    Mao, Zhu
    Todd, Michael
    MODEL VALIDATION AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, VOL 3, 2015, : 105 - 112
  • [35] A hybrid colour model based land cover classification using random forest and support vector machine classifiers
    Rama, M. Christy
    Mahendran, D. S.
    Kumar, T. C. Raja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2018, 5 (02) : 87 - 100
  • [36] New clustering algorithms for the support vector machine based hierarchical classification
    Cevikalp, Hakan
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2010, 31 (11) : 1285 - 1291
  • [37] Efficient random subspace support vector machine for hyperspectral image classification
    Huang, Hisao-Yun
    Shao, Yuehjen E.
    Cheng, Yung-Wen
    Lu, Hung-Yi
    Yang, Nanping
    ICIC Express Letters, 2012, 6 (02): : 443 - 448
  • [38] Data Classification with Support Vector Machine and Generalized Support Vector Machine
    Qi, Xiaomin
    Silvestrov, Sergei
    Nazir, Talat
    ICNPAA 2016 WORLD CONGRESS: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE AND SCIENCES, 2017, 1798
  • [39] Forest classification trees and forest support vector machines algorithms: Demonstration using microarray data
    Zintzaras, Elias
    Kowald, Axel
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (05) : 519 - 524
  • [40] Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Regression for Prediction of BIM Labor Cost on Architectural Modeling and Plotting
    Huang C.-H.
    Hsieh S.-H.
    Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, 2021, 33 (05): : 389 - 398