Comparison between random forest and support vector machine algorithms for LULC classification

被引:37
|
作者
Avci, Cengiz [1 ]
Budak, Muhammed [1 ]
Yagmur, Nur [1 ]
Balcik, Filiz Bektas [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Remote sensing; Supervised Classification; Random Forest; Support Vector Machine; Wetland; LAND-COVER;
D O I
10.26833/ijeg.987605
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Nowadays, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely chosen for classifying satellite images for mapping Earth's surface. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) stand out among these algorithms with their accurate results in the literature. The aim of this study is to analyze the performances of these algorithms on land use and land cover (LULC) classification, especially wetlands which have significant ecological functions. For this purpose, Sentinel-2 satellite image, which is freely provided by European Space Agency (ESA), was used to monitor not only the open surface water body but also around Marmara Lake. The performance evaluation was made with the increasing number of the training dataset. 3 different training datasets having 10, 15, and 20 areas of interest (AOI) per class, respectively were used for the classification of the satellite images acquired in 2015 and 2020. The most accurate results were obtained from the classification with RF algorithm and 20 AOIs. According to obtained results, the change detection analysis of Marmara Lake was investigated for possible reasons. Whereas the water body and wetland have decreased more than 50% between 2015 and 2020, crop sites have increased approximately 50%.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between Support Vector Machine and Random Forest for Audio Classification
    Ansari, Md Rifat
    Tumpa, Sadia Alam
    Raya, Jannat Ara Ferdouse
    Murshed, Mohammad N.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2021 (ICECIT 2021), 2021,
  • [2] Comparison of random forest, random ferns and support vector machine for eye state classification
    Dong, Yanchao
    Zhang, Yan
    Yue, Jiguang
    Hu, Zhencheng
    [J]. MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 75 (19) : 11763 - 11783
  • [3] Comparison of random forest, random ferns and support vector machine for eye state classification
    Yanchao Dong
    Yan Zhang
    Jiguang Yue
    Zhencheng Hu
    [J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2016, 75 : 11763 - 11783
  • [4] Comparison of Support Vector Machine and Random Forest Algorithms for Invasive and Expansive Species Classification Using Airborne Hyperspectral Data
    Sabat-Tomala, Anita
    Raczko, Edwin
    Zagajewski, Bogdan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [5] Applicability of computer vision in seed identification: deep learning, random forest, and support vector machine classification algorithms
    Bao, Francielli
    Bambil, Deborah
    [J]. ACTA BOTANICA BRASILICA, 2021, 35 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [6] Cancer Disease Prediction with Support Vector Machine and Random Forest Classification Techniques
    Ahmed, Ashfaq K.
    Aljahdali, Sultan
    Hundewale, Nisar
    Ahmed, Ishthaq K.
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND CYBERNETICS (CYBERNETICSCOM), 2012, : 16 - 19
  • [7] Direct comparison between support vector machine and multinomial naive Bayes algorithms for medical abstract classification
    Matwin, Stan
    Sazonova, Vera
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 19 (05) : 917 - 917
  • [8] Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Models for Honey Classification
    Martinez-Castillo, Cecilia
    Astray, Gonzalo
    Mejuto, Juan Carlos
    Simal-Gandara, Jesus
    [J]. EFOOD, 2020, 1 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [9] A comparison of support vector machine with maximum likelihood classification algorithms on texture features
    Jin, SY
    Li, DR
    Wang, JW
    [J]. IGARSS 2005: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Vols 1-8, Proceedings, 2005, : 3717 - 3720
  • [10] Performance Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Extreme Learning Machine for Intrusion Detection
    Ahmad, Iftikhar
    Basheri, Mohammad
    Iqbal, Muhammad Javed
    Rahim, Aneel
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 33789 - 33795