Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Dialogs Between Fiction and Science Teaching

被引:1
|
作者
de Carvalho Ferrasa, Ingrid Aline [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Machado, Elaine Ferreira [1 ,3 ]
Miquelin, Awdry Feisser [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Mocellin, Ronei Clecio [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Sauer Leal, Bruna Elise [1 ]
Kuchla, Micheli [1 ,3 ,8 ]
Reis Oliveira, Luciane Kawa [1 ,3 ]
Salm Coelho, Adriane Marie [5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Fed Technol Univ Parana PPGECT Brazil, 330 Jardim Carvalho, BR-84017220 Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[3] SEED PR, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[6] Univ Paris X, Nanterre, France
[7] UFPR Fed Univ Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[8] State Univ Midwest, Guarapuava, Brazil
[9] Fed Technol Univ Parana DAENS, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
VOLCANIC-ERUPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11191-021-00309-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this article, we present reflections on the possible dialogs between literary creation and science teaching. Our considerations will be directed to the work of Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the role of science and science education over the text that gave rise to the genre "science fiction." This work aims at presenting the possibilities of using Shelley's work in order to explore historical, methodological, conceptual, social, and political implications that may be useful for motivating reflection in teaching science in the classroom in times of "post-truth." In order to do this, we base our notes on the conceptions of Science, Technology, and Society (STS); in rationality and reasonability; in aspects of bioethics; and on the man-machine implications according to the scientific community in the educational field. In addition to the pedagogical mediation of concepts by the teacher, we seek to look at different strategies as alternatives for pedagogical action in science teaching, through dialog.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 420
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条