Combining methods to conduct a systematic review and propose a conceptual and theoretical framework in socio-environmental research

被引:1
|
作者
Eyzaguirre, Indira A. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fernandes, Marcus E. B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pard UFPA, Programa Pds graduaσao Biol Ambiental, Laboratdrio Ecol Manguezal LAMA, Inst Estudos Costeiros IECOS, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro, BR-68600000 Aldeia, Braganca, Brazil
[2] Sarambui Civil Soc Org, Braganca, Para, Brazil
[3] Resiliencia Innovadora, Dept Pesquisa, Lima, Peru
关键词
Systematic review; Bibliometric; Meta-analysis; SODIP steps; Open-source tools; Theoretical framework; Conceptual framework; Mangrove; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SCIENCE; AGREEMENT; QUALITY; TRENDS; KAPPA; SCALE; EARTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.mex.2023.102484
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study aims to present a combination of methods and propose robust theoretical and conceptual frameworks for solving socio-environmental issues. This proposal included the Problem, Intervention, Context, and Outcome (PICO) framework and Protocol and Reporting result with Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis framework, and develop (PSALSAR) method through SODIP steps: (i) Systematic review and meta-analysis defining the study from guiding questions; (ii) Open-source related to software and data; (iii) Data visualization and design information; (iv) Identification of gaps, challenges and trends through automation and lexicometric analysis; and (v) Proposal of theoretical and conceptual frameworks. This proposal defines the steps as support to combine and systematize information necessary to facilitate the production of this type of document using open-access software in the visualization and design of information. All these steps are replicable and essential to propose a conceptual and theoretical framework to contribute to the construction of knowledge in socio-environmental research and to propose solutions by filling in the gaps. In summary, this combination of methods shows: center dot The use of SODIP steps provides robustness and efficiency in carrying out review studies, facilitating the way to propose theoretical or conceptual frameworks. center dot Choosing to use open-source tools is essential for better evaluation and visualization of qualitative and quantitative data in review studies. center dot The combination of methods and data in the systematic review (scientific, political documents. and databases) supports the proposal of robust theoretical and conceptual frameworks.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Avatars and Embodied Agents in Experimental Information Systems Research: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework
    Aljaroodi, Hussain M.
    Adam, Marc T. P.
    Chiong, Raymond
    Teubner, Timm
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 23
  • [32] Capacity building for organizational performance: a systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions
    Saputra, Nika
    Putera, Roni Ekha
    Zetra, Aidinil
    Azwar, Tengku Rika
    Valentina, Tengku Rika
    Mulia, Rizki Afri
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [33] Socio-environmental predictive factors for discharge destination after inpatient rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chevalley, Odile
    Truijen, Steven
    Saeys, Wim
    Opsommer, Emmanuelle
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (18) : 4974 - 4985
  • [34] Patient-professional communication research in cancer: An integrative review of research methods in the context of a conceptual framework
    Merckaert, I
    Libert, Y
    Razavi, D
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (10) : 829 - 830
  • [35] Scenario processes for socio-environmental systems analysis of futures: A review of recent efforts and a salient research agenda for supporting decision making
    Elsawah, Sondoss
    Hamilton, Serena H.
    Jakeman, Anthony J.
    Rothman, Dale
    Schweizer, Vanessa
    Trutnevyte, Evelina
    Carlsen, Henrik
    Drakes, Crystal
    Frame, Bob
    Fu, Baihua
    Guivarch, Celine
    Haasnoot, Marjolijn
    Kemp-Benedict, Eric
    Kok, Kasper
    Kosow, Hannah
    Ryan, Mike
    van Delden, Hedwig
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 729 (729)
  • [36] Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review
    Sarah A. Birken
    Byron J. Powell
    Justin Presseau
    M. Alexis Kirk
    Fabiana Lorencatto
    Natalie J. Gould
    Christopher M. Shea
    Bryan J. Weiner
    Jill J. Francis
    Yan Yu
    Emily Haines
    Laura J. Damschroder
    Implementation Science, 12
  • [37] Approaches combining methods of Operational Research with Business Process Model and Notation: A systematic review
    Tomaskova, Hana
    Weber, Gerhard-Wilhelm
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2020,
  • [38] Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review
    Birken, Sarah A.
    Powell, Byron J.
    Presseau, Justin
    Kirk, M. Alexis
    Lorencatto, Fabiana
    Gould, Natalie J.
    Shea, Christopher M.
    Weiner, Bryan J.
    Francis, Jill J.
    Yu, Yan
    Haines, Emily
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [39] The impact of socio-environmental factors on brain structure over the early life course of preterm-born individuals- A systematic review
    Barda, Taylor
    Schmitz-Koep, Benita
    Menegaux, Aurore
    Bartmann, Peter
    Wolke, Dieter
    Sorg, Christian
    Hedderich, Dennis M.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2025, 170
  • [40] Promoting green healthcare initiatives: A systematic literature review, conceptual framework and future research agenda
    Sahoo, Manas
    Kumar, Arvind
    Thakur, Vikas
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 498