Thoracolumbar Injury: The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scoring System or Modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity?

被引:0
|
作者
Hajiahmadi, Somayeh [1 ]
Rezvani, Majid [2 ]
Fahimitabar, Saeid [1 ]
Rasti, Sina [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Ligament; Lumbar vertebrae; MRI; Neurosurgery; Radiology; Spine; Thoracic vertebrae; POSTERIOR LIGAMENTOUS COMPLEX; SPINE; FRACTURES; DECISION; RELIABILITY; MORPHOLOGY; INTEGRITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.WNEU.2022.10.055
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare the Thoracolumbar Injury Clas-sification and Severity (TLICS) scoring system with its modified (mTLICS) version based on their agreement with the surgeon's opinion regarding treatment for patients with thoracolumbar injuries. Moreover, the Posterior Ligamen-tous Complex health was compared between intra-operative examinations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. -METHODS: MRI was obtained from 114 patients suffering thoracolumbar spinal trauma; the TLICS and mTLICS scores were measured. Approaches 1 and 2 were designed in both scoring systems based on assuming a total score of 4 as surgery and conservative management indication, respectively. Kappa was used to estimate the agreements between each approach and the surgeon's opinion on treatment. The receiver operating curve calcu-lated the appropriate cut-off scores for the above systems over which surgical management was preferred. A P< 0.05 was considered significant. -RESULTS: All the approaches showed moderate agree-ments with the surgeon's opinion on therapeutic manage-ment (TLICS: Kapproach1 = 0.557, Kapproach2 =0.508; mTLICS: Kapproach1 = 0.557, Kapproach2 = 0.551; P< 0.001 for each K). A score >3.5 best illustrated the indication for surgery in both systems. The radiology report agreed stronger with intraoperatively observed ligamentous health when suspi-cious cases on MRI were reported as injured (KTLICS = 0.830, KmTLICS = 0.704) rather than healthy (KTLICS = 0.620, KmTLICS = 0.620).CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon's treatment plan agreed moderately with suggestions of the TLICS and mTLICS systems; surgery was the preferred management for the patients with a score of 4. Moreover, radiologic suspicion of Posterior Ligamentous Complex injury seemed to indi-cate a damaged ligament rather than a healthy one.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:E73 / E82
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Superiority of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) over AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification for the surgical management decision of traumatic spine injury in the pediatric population
    Corentin Dauleac
    Carmine Mottolese
    Pierre-Aurélien Beuriat
    Alexandru Szathmari
    Federico Di Rocco
    European Spine Journal, 2021, 30 : 3036 - 3042
  • [32] Superiority of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) over AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification for the surgical management decision of traumatic spine injury in the pediatric population
    Dauleac, Corentin
    Mottolese, Carmine
    Beuriat, Pierre-Aurelien
    Szathmari, Alexandru
    Di Rocco, Federico
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (10) : 3036 - 3042
  • [33] Applicability of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score to Criteria of Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Treatment Decision of Thoracolumbar Injury
    Choi, Hyuk Jin
    Kim, Hwan Soo
    Nam, Kyoung Hyup
    Cho, Won Ho
    Choi, Byung Kwan
    Han, In Ho
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 57 (03) : 174 - 177
  • [34] Multicenter retrospective evaluation of the validity of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score system in children
    Sellin, Jonathan N.
    Steele, William J., III
    Simpson, Lauren
    Huff, Wei X.
    Lane, Brandon C.
    Chern, Joshua J.
    Fulkerson, Daniel H.
    Sayama, Christina M.
    Jea, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2016, 18 (02) : 164 - 170
  • [35] Classifications In Brief: The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification
    Magnusson, Erik
    Spina, Nicholas
    Fernando, Navin D.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (01) : 160 - 166
  • [36] Retrospective Analysis of Thoracolumbar Junction Injuries Using the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity and Classification Score, American Spinal Injury Association Class, Injury Severity Score, Age, Sex, and Length of Hospitalization
    Dodwad, Shah-Nawaz M.
    Dodwad, Shah-Jahan M.
    Wisneski, Ronald
    Khan, Safdar N.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (07): : E410 - E416
  • [37] The evolution of thoracolumbar injury classification systems
    Sethi, Manish K.
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Bono, Christopher M.
    Harris, Mitchel B.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (09): : 780 - 788
  • [38] Low Lumbar Fractures Does Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score Work?
    Moore, Timothy A.
    Bransford, Richard J.
    France, John C.
    Anderson, James
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Anderson, Paul A.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (17) : E1021 - E1025
  • [39] How Should Patients with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score of 4 Be Treated?
    Lee, Nam-Hun
    Kim, Sung-Kyu
    Seo, Hyoung-Yeon
    Park, Eric T.
    Jang, Won-Young
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [40] The complement of the load-sharing classification for the thoracolumbar injury classification system in managing thoracolumbar burst fractures
    Machino, Masaaki
    Yukawa, Yasutsugu
    Ito, Keigo
    Kanbara, Shunsuke
    Kato, Fumihiko
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2013, 18 (01) : 81 - 86