Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU

被引:4
|
作者
Sikora, Andrea [1 ]
Zhang, Tianyi [2 ]
Murphy, David J. [3 ]
Smith, Susan E. [1 ]
Murray, Brian [4 ]
Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan [5 ,6 ]
Chen, Xianyan [2 ]
Buckley, Mitchell S. [7 ]
Rowe, Sandra [8 ]
Devlin, John W. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Clin & Adm Pharm, Coll Pharm, 1120 15th St,HM-118, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Stat, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Athens, GA USA
[3] Emory Univ, Div Pulm Allergy Crit Care & Sleep Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Pharm, Med Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Emory Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] LaJolla Pharmaceut, Waltham, MA USA
[8] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Pharm, Portland, OR USA
[9] Northeastern Univ, Sch Pharm, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[10] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
CRITICALLY-ILL; MANAGEMENT; CARE; ACCUMULATION; PREVALENCE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-46735-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Fluid overload, while common in the ICU and associated with serious sequelae, is hard to predict and may be influenced by ICU medication use. Machine learning (ML) approaches may offer advantages over traditional regression techniques to predict it. We compared the ability of traditional regression techniques and different ML-based modeling approaches to identify clinically meaningful fluid overload predictors. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients admitted to an ICU >= 72 h between 10/1/2015 and 10/31/2020 with available fluid balance data. Models to predict fluid overload (a positive fluid balance >= 10% of the admission body weight) in the 48-72 h after ICU admission were created. Potential patient and medication fluid overload predictor variables (n=28) were collected at either baseline or 24 h after ICU admission. The optimal traditional logistic regression model was created using backward selection. Supervised, classification-based ML models were trained and optimized, including a meta-modeling approach. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared between the traditional and ML fluid prediction models. A total of 49 of the 391 (12.5%) patients developed fluid overload. Among the ML models, the XGBoost model had the highest performance (AUROC 0.78, PPV 0.27, NPV 0.94) for fluid overload prediction. The XGBoost model performed similarly to the final traditional logistic regression model (AUROC 0.70; PPV 0.20, NPV 0.94). Feature importance analysis revealed severity of illness scores and medication-related data were the most important predictors of fluid overload. In the context of our study, ML and traditional models appear to perform similarly to predict fluid overload in the ICU. Baseline severity of illness and ICU medication regimen complexity are important predictors of fluid overload.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Single classifier vs. ensemble machine learning approaches for mental health prediction
    Chung, Jetli
    Teo, Jason
    BRAIN INFORMATICS, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [32] Tree induction vs. logistic regression: A learning-curve analysis
    Perlich, C
    Provost, F
    Simonoff, JS
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2004, 4 (02) : 211 - 255
  • [33] Deep Learning vs. Traditional Computer Vision
    O'Mahony, Niall
    Campbell, Sean
    Carvalho, Anderson
    Harapanahalli, Suman
    Hernandez, Gustavo Velasco
    Krpalkova, Lenka
    Riordan, Daniel
    Walsh, Joseph
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTER VISION, CVC, VOL 1, 2020, 943 : 128 - 144
  • [34] KNN vs. Bluecat-Machine Learning vs. Classical Statistics
    Rozos, Evangelos
    Koutsoyiannis, Demetris
    Montanari, Alberto
    HYDROLOGY, 2022, 9 (06)
  • [35] ULTRAFILTRATION VS. DIURETICS FOR THE TREATMENT OF FLUID OVERLOAD IN HEART FAILURE PATIENTS: A HOSPITAL COST ANALYSIS
    Costanzo, M. R.
    Fonarow, G. C.
    Rizzo, J. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S167 - S167
  • [36] Deep Learning vs. Traditional Learning for Radio Frequency Fingerprinting
    Otto, Andreas
    Rananga, Seani
    Masonta, Moshe
    2024 IST-AFRICA CONFERENCE, 2024,
  • [37] Comparative Analysis of Hate Speech Detection: Traditional vs. Deep Learning Approaches
    Pen, Haibo
    Teo, Nicole
    Wang, Zhaoxia
    2024 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, CAI 2024, 2024, : 332 - 337
  • [38] Analysis of Diabetic Prediction & Regression System using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Ghodeswar, Ujwala
    Keote, Minal
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 20 (03) : 750 - 762
  • [39] Enhancing crop yield prediction through machine learning regression analysis
    Sharma, Seema
    Jain, Anupriya
    Sharma, Sachin
    Whig, Pawan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATICS, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [40] Classification vs. Regression - Machine Learning Approaches for Service Recommendation based on Measured Consumer Experiences
    Kirchner, Jens
    Heberle, Andreas
    Lowe, Welf
    2015 IEEE WORLD CONGRESS ON SERVICES, 2015, : 278 - 285