Prenatal Care Initiation and Exposure to Teratogenic Medications

被引:2
|
作者
Winterstein, Almut G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Wang, Yanning [1 ,4 ]
Smolinski, Nicole E. [1 ,2 ]
Thai, Thuy N. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Ewig, Celeste [1 ,2 ]
Rasmussen, Sonja A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Safety, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Epidemiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Hlth Outcomes & Biomed Informat, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] HUTECH Univ, Fac Pharm, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Univ Florida, Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Safety, 1225 Ctr Dr,HPNP3320 Bldg, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS; CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS; PREGNANCY EPISODES;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54298
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance With new legal abortion restrictions, timing of prenatal care initiation is critical to allow for discussion of reproductive options among pregnancies exposed to teratogenic medications. Objective To investigate the prevalence of prenatal exposure to teratogenic medications and prenatal care initiation across gestational weeks. Design, Setting, and Participants This descriptive, population-based cross-sectional study used health encounter data from a national sample of individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance. A validated algorithm identified pregnancies among persons identifying as female that ended with a live or nonlive outcome between January 2017 and December 2019. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to December 2023. Exposures Prenatal exposure to any of 137 teratogenic medications, measured via pharmacy and medical claims. Measurement of prenatal care initiation was adapted from the Children's Health Care Quality Measures. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of prenatal exposure to teratogens and prenatal care initiation by gestational week. Timing of prenatal teratogenic exposure was compared with timing of prenatal care initiation and legal abortion cutoffs. Results Among 639 994 pregnancies, 472 472 (73.8%; 95% CI, 73.7%-73.9%) had a live delivery (mean [SD] age, 30.9 [5.4] years) and 167 522 (26.2%; 95% CI, 26.1%-26.3%) had a nonlive outcome (mean [SD] age, 31.6 [6.4] years). Of pregnancies with live deliveries, 5.8% (95% CI, 5.7%-5.8%) were exposed to teratogenic medications compared with 3.1% (95% CI, 3.0%-3.2%) with nonlive outcomes. Median time to prenatal care was 56 days (IQR, 44-70 days). By 6 weeks' gestation, 8186 pregnancies had been exposed to teratogenic medications (25.2% [95% CI, 24.7%-25.7%] of pregnancies exposed at any time during gestation; 1.3% [95% CI, 1.3%-1.3%] of all pregnancies); in 6877 (84.0%; 95% CI, 83.2%-84.8%), prenatal care was initiated after 6 weeks or not at all. By 15 weeks, teratogenic exposures had occurred for 48.9% (95% CI, 48.4%-49.5%) of all teratogen-exposed pregnancies (2.5% [2.4-2.5] of all pregnancies); prenatal care initiation occurred after 15 weeks for 1810 (16.8%; 95% CI, 16.1%-17.5%) with live deliveries and 2975 (58.3%; 95% CI, 56.9%-59.6%) with nonlive outcomes. Teratogenic medications most used within the first 15 gestational weeks among live deliveries included antiinfectives (eg, fluconazole), anticonvulsants (eg, valproate), antihypertensives (eg, lisinopril), and immunomodulators (eg, mycophenolate). For nonlive deliveries, most antihypertensives were replaced by vitamin A derivatives. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, most exposures to teratogenic medications occurred in early pregnancy and before prenatal care initiation, precluding prenatal risk-benefit assessments. Prenatal care commonly occurred after strict legal abortion cutoffs, prohibiting consideration of pregnancy termination if concerns about teratogenic effects arose.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prenatal Exposure to Antiseizure Medications and Risk of Epilepsy in Children of Mothers With Epilepsy
    Dreier, Julie Werenberg
    Christensen, Jakob
    Igland, Jannicke
    Gissler, Mika
    Leinonen, Maarit K.
    Vegrim, Hakon Magne
    Sun, Yuelian
    Tomson, Torbjoern
    Zoega, Helga
    Bjork, Marte-Helene
    Bromley, Rebecca L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (02) : E2356425
  • [32] PREGNANCY WANTEDNESS AND THE EARLY INITIATION OF PRENATAL-CARE
    JOYCE, TJ
    GROSSMAN, M
    DEMOGRAPHY, 1990, 27 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [33] Impact of delayed initiation of prenatal care on neonatal outcomes
    Sarker, Minhazur R.
    Skeith, Ashley E.
    Bacheller, Hannah
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Valent, Amy M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S240 - S240
  • [34] Association of preconceptional health care utilization and early initiation of prenatal care
    Liu, Y.
    Liu, J.
    Ye, R.
    Li, Z.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2006, 26 (07) : 409 - 413
  • [35] Timing of prenatal care initiation and risk of congenital malformations
    Carmichael, SL
    Shaw, GM
    Nelson, V
    TERATOLOGY, 2002, 66 (06) : 326 - 330
  • [36] Factors predicting the initiation of prenatal care in Mexican women
    Quelopana, Ana M.
    Champion, Jane Dimmitt
    Salazar, Bertha C.
    MIDWIFERY, 2009, 25 (03) : 277 - 285
  • [37] Impact of delayed initiation of prenatal care on maternal outcomes
    Sarker, Minhazur R.
    Skeith, Ashley E.
    Bacheller, Hannah
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Valent, Amy M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S388 - S389
  • [38] Association of preconceptional health care utilization and early initiation of prenatal care
    Y Liu
    J Liu
    R Ye
    Z Li
    Journal of Perinatology, 2006, 26 : 409 - 413
  • [39] Adolescent Initiation of Drug Use: Effects of Prenatal Cocaine Exposure
    Richardson, Gale A.
    Larkby, Cynthia
    Goldschmidt, Lidush
    Day, Nancy L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 52 (01): : 37 - 46
  • [40] Prescribing Teratogenic Medications Post-Dobbs
    Hingtgen, Grace M.
    Solberg, Lauren B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2024, 24 (02): : 49 - 51