Belumosudil Impacts Immunosuppression Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

被引:1
|
作者
Gonzalez, Rebecca [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gaskill, Eric [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Padilla, Maya [1 ]
Pidala, Joseph [1 ]
Lazaryan, Aleksandr [1 ]
Perez, Lia [1 ]
Khimani, Farhad [1 ]
Faramand, Rawan [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Blood & Marrow Transplantat & Cellular Immunother, Tampa, FL USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Pharm, Tampa, FL USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
来源
TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY | 2023年 / 29卷 / 09期
关键词
Tacrolimus; Sirolimus; Belumosudil; Pharmacokinetics; Drug-drug interaction; Chronic graft-versus-host disease; Allogeneic transplantation; FAILURE-FREE SURVIVAL; SYSTEMIC TREATMENT; TACROLIMUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtct.2023.06.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Belumosudil (BEL) is a novel Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in patients who have failed 2 or more prior lines of systemic therapy. Although the pharmacokinetic effects of BEL on other immunosuppressive (IS) agents have not been clinically evaluated, in vitro data indicate that BEL may have possible interactions with drugs with a narrow therapeutic index used to treat cGVHD, such as tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine, through cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) and p-glyco-protein interactions. Further evaluation of these potential interactions is warranted to optimize the safety and effectiveness of these medications when combined with BEL. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of BEL on sirolimus and tacrolimus levels when used concurrently by assessing changes in IS levels after the addition of BEL. This retrospective single-center study of patients who started BEL while on tacrolimus and/or sirolimus between February 1, 2019, to February 1, 2023, included patients who had IS levels measured at baseline prior to starting BEL and at least 1 subsequent IS measurement to assess changes over time. The primary endpoint was the concentration-dose (C/D) ratio analyzed before and after the addition of BEL. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of IS levels out-side of the therapeutic range (subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic) and mean dosage changes over time. Thirty-seven patients met our eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. Patients taking sirolimus (n = 30) or tacrolimus (n = 16) concurrently with BEL had a statistically significant increase in the C/D ratio (sirolimus recipients, 160% [P < .001]; tacrolimus recipients, 113% [P = .013]) between the pre-BEL and final post-BEL assessments. The C/D ratios for both tacrolimus and sirolimus recipients continued to increase at several time points after initiation of BEL, indicating that multiple drug dosage adjustments may be required. After BEL initiation, 19% of tacrolimus levels and 57% of sirolimus levels were supratherapeutic. Despite dosage adjustments, 27% of tacrolimus levels were supratherapeutic at both the second and third assessments after starting BEL, and 28% and 30% of sirolimus levels were supratherapeutic at these 2 time points, respectively. All 12 of the patients who discontinued BEL during the study period (100%) showed a return to their baseline C/D ratio, confirming that the C/D ratio change can be attributed to BEL. The impact of BEL on IS levels is clinically significant, warranting dosage adjustments of concurrent medications. A significant number of patients taking sirolimus with BEL had levels >15 ng/mL during the study period, indicating a potential risk for toxicity if this interaction is unmonitored. We recommend empiric dose reductions of 25% for tacrolimus and 25% to 50% for sirolimus when adding BEL, as well as close monitoring of IS levels during the initial weeks of BEL therapy. Future studies are warranted to better describe the impact of BEL on patients taking CYP3A inhibitors.Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:577.e1 / 577.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CHRONIC SCLERODERMATOUS GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE
    MULLERSERTEN, B
    VAKILZADEH, F
    HAUTARZT, 1994, 45 (11): : 772 - 775
  • [42] Chronic graft-versus-host disease and seizure
    Azuno, Y
    Yaga, K
    Kaneko, T
    Kaku, K
    Oka, Y
    BLOOD, 1998, 91 (07) : 2626 - 2628
  • [43] Rehabilitation in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
    Smith, Sean Robinson
    Asher, Arash
    PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 28 (01) : 143 - +
  • [44] Ruxolitinib for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease
    Shibusawa, Motoharu
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (17): : 1631 - 1631
  • [45] The pathophysiology of chronic graft-versus-host disease
    Kansu, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2004, 79 (03) : 209 - 215
  • [46] Therapy of chronic graft-versus-host disease
    Arora, Mukta
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 2008, 21 (02) : 271 - 279
  • [47] Management of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
    Baker, Melissa
    McKiernan, Phyllis
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2011, 15 (04) : 429 - 432
  • [48] The pathophysiology of chronic graft-versus-host disease
    Emin Kansu
    International Journal of Hematology, 2004, 79 : 209 - 215
  • [49] THE BIOLOGY OF CHRONIC GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE
    DEEG, HJ
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 1985, 13 : 128 - 130
  • [50] The Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
    Wolff, Daniel
    Bertz, Hartmut
    Greinix, Hildegard
    Lawitschka, Anita
    Halter, Joerg
    Holler, Ernst
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (43): : 732 - I