Regional Anesthesia as an Alternative to Procedural Sedation for Forearm Fracture Reductions in the Pediatric Emergency Department

被引:3
|
作者
Sulton, Carmen D. [1 ,5 ]
Fletcher, Nicholas [2 ]
Murphy, Joshua [3 ]
Gillespie, Scott [4 ]
Burger, Rebecca K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Div Pediat Emergency Med,Dept Pediat, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Emory Univ, Ctr Adv Pediat, Dept Orthopaed, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Childrens Phys Grp Orthopaed, Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Div Biostat, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta Egleston, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Emergency Med, 1405 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
forearm fractures; procedural sedation; bier blocks; hematoma blocks; PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; CLOSED REDUCTION; HEMATOMA BLOCK; PROPOFOL; KETAMINE; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/PEC.0000000000002993
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Pediatric forearm fractures are common injuries in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Pediatric procedural sedation (PPS) is often required for forearm fracture reductions and pain control for casting. Bier blocks and hematoma blocks are types of regional anesthesia (RA) procedures that can be performed as a potential alternative to PPS. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the safety of RA with that of PPS. We hypothesized that RA has a safety profile that is equal or superior to PPS as well as a shorter duration of treatment in the PED. Methods: Pediatric emergency department encounters in patients presenting with a diagnosis of radius fracture, ulna fracture, distal "both-bone" fracture, Monteggia fracture, and/or Galeazzi fracture were included. Outcomes of interest included patient adverse events (AEs), sedation medications used, PED duration of treatment (arrival time to disposition time), sedation failures, and reduction failures. Results: Propensity matching was performed resulting in 632 well-matched RA-PPS pairs. The PPS cohort had 13% of encounters with at least 1 AE compared with 0.2% in the RA cohort, P < 0.001. The most common AE in the PPS group was hypoxia (9.8%), and the only AE in the RA group was an intravenous infiltrate (0.16%). Within the matched cohorts, PPS required more medications than RA (100% vs 60%, P < 0.001). Ketamine alone was more commonly used in the PPS group than the RA group (86% vs 0.2%, P < 0.001). Propofol was used only in the PPS group. The average duration of treatment was 205 (SD, 81) minutes in the PPS group and 178 (SD, 75) minutes in the RA group (P < 0.001). There were no reduction failures in either group. Conclusions: Bier blocks and hematoma blocks are an acceptable alternative to PPS for children requiring forearm reductions. The AE rate is low and the reduction success rate is high. Duration of treatment in the PED is shorter for patients receiving RA compared with PPS.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 87
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Procedural sedation and analgesia for reduction of distal forearm fractures in the paediatric emergency department: A clinical survey
    Schofield, Scott
    Schutz, Jacquie
    Babl, Franz E.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2013, 25 (03) : 241 - 247
  • [42] Impact of Using a Precompleted Consent Form for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department
    Mccollum, Nichole
    Silva, Olivia
    Sigman, Laura
    Breslin, Kristen
    Kline, Jaclyn
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2024, 40 (04) : e16 - e22
  • [43] Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department
    Pitetti, RD
    Singh, S
    Pierce, MC
    ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2003, 157 (11): : 1090 - 1096
  • [44] Pediatric procedural sedation in the community emergency department - Results from the ProSCED registry
    Sacchetti, Alfred
    Stander, Eric
    Ferguson, Nancy
    Maniar, Gina
    Valko, Peter
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2007, 23 (04) : 218 - 222
  • [45] Propofol for procedural sedation in a community emergency department
    Charles, M
    McGinnis, HD
    Wehner, P
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (03) : S64 - S64
  • [46] Patient satisfaction with procedural sedation in the emergency department
    Johnson, Olivia G.
    Taylor, David McD
    Lee, Marina
    Ding, Juen-Li
    Ashok, Aadith
    Johnson, Damian
    Peck, Daniel
    Knott, Jonathan
    Weinberg, Laurence
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2017, 29 (03) : 303 - 309
  • [47] Emergency department procedural sedation: the London experience
    Elkhodair, Samer M.
    Baker, Elinor C.
    Glasebrook, Will R.
    Pott, Jason D.
    Freund, Yonathan
    Harris, Tim R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (06) : 407 - 412
  • [48] The Newest Threat to Emergency Department Procedural Sedation
    Green, Steven M.
    Roback, Mark G.
    Krauss, Baruch S.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (02) : 115 - 119
  • [49] Improving the practice of procedural sedation in the emergency department
    Conroy, S.
    Choi, H.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 : 35 - 35
  • [50] Procedural sedation and analgesia for children in the emergency department
    Flood, RG
    Krauss, B
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 21 (01) : 121 - +