Robotic-Assisted Augmented Roof Ureteroplasty With Appendiceal Onlay Flap

被引:4
|
作者
Gabrielson, Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Oscar [1 ,2 ]
Cohen, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Mid-to-proximal ureteral strictures pose a surgical challenge that historically required ileal ureter substitution, downward nephropexy, or renal autotransplantation. Ureteral reconstruction techniques involving buccal mucosa or appendix have gained traction with success rates approaching 90%.OBJECTIVES In this video we describe surgical technique for a robotic-assisted augmented roof ureteroplasty using an appendiceal onlay flap.MATERIALS AND METHODS Our patient is a 45-year-old male with recurrent impacted ureteral stones requiring multiple right-sided interventions including ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy, ureteral dilation, and laser incision of ureteral stricture. Despite adequate treatment of his stone disease, he had deterioration of his renal split function with worsening right hydroureteronephrosis to the level of the mid-to-proximal ureter consistent with failed endoscopic management of his stricture. We proceeded with simultaneous endoscopic evaluation and robotic repair with plan for either ureteroureteros-tomy or augmented roof ureteroplasty using buccal mucosa or an appendiceal flap.RESULTS Reteroscopy and retrograde pyelogram revealed a 2-3 cm near-obliterative stricture in the mid-to-proximal ureter. The ureteroscope was left in situ and the patient was placed in the modified flank position to allow concurrent endoscopic access during reconstruction. The right colon was reflected revealing significant scar tissue overlying the ureter. With the ureteroscope in situ, we utilized firefly imaging to aid in our dissection. The ureter was spatulated and mucosa of the diseased segment of ureter excised in a nontransecting manner. The mucosal edges of the posterior ureter were re-approximated with the ureteral backing left in place. Intraoperatively, we identified a healthy, robust appearing appendix and thus planned for an appendiceal onlay flap. If an atretic or diseased appendix was encountered, a buccal mucosa graft with omental wrap would be utilized. The appendix was harvested on its mesentery, spatulated, and interposed in a pro-peristaltic fashion. A tension-free anastomosis was performed between ureteral mucosa and the open appendix flap. A double-J stent was placed under direct vision and Indocyanine Green (ICG) green was used to evaluate blood supply to the margins of the ureter and the appendix flap. The stent was removed 6 weeks postoperatively, and on 3-month follow-up imaging he had resolution of his right hydroureteronephrosis and has had no further episodes of stone formation, infections, or flank pain with 8-month follow-up.CONCLUSION Augmented roof ureteroplasty with appendiceal onlay is a valuable tool in the urologists arsenal of reconstructive techniques. Use of intraoperative ureteroscopy with firefly imaging can aid in delineating anatomy during difficult ureteral dissections.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 245
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
    Castle, Erik P.
    Lowentritt, Benjamin
    Burgess, Scott V.
    Thomas, Raju
    Davis, Rodney
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A312 - A312
  • [42] Robotic-assisted surgery
    Huguier, Michel
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2017, 201 (7-9): : 1041 - 1044
  • [43] ROBOTIC-ASSISTED PYELOLITHOTOMY
    Figenshau, R.
    Roytman, T.
    Benway, B.
    Desai, A.
    Christensen, T.
    Gardner, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A394 - A394
  • [44] Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
    Castle, Erik P.
    Woods, Michael E.
    Burgess, Scott V.
    Thomas, Raju
    Thomas, Raju
    Davis, Rodney
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 608 - 608
  • [45] Robotic-Assisted Repair of Iatrogenic Ureteral Ligation Following Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy
    Kalisvaart, Jonathan F.
    Finley, David S.
    Ornstein, David K.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2008, 12 (04) : 414 - 416
  • [46] Robotic-Assisted Simple Peritoneal Flap for Cystostomy Repair After Cesarean Delivery
    Nguyen, C.
    Do, T.
    Kilic, G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 145 (5S):
  • [47] DECISION POINT FOR BUCCAL MUCOSA GRAFT URETEROPLASTY: AUGMENTED ANASTOMOTIC VERSUS VENTRAL ONLAY TECHNIQUE
    Lee, Matthew
    Strauss, David
    Jeong, Julienne
    Wei, Jeffrey
    Kim, Joshua
    Lee, Ziho
    Zhao, Lee
    Stifelman, Michael
    Eun, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E81 - E81
  • [48] Robotic-Assisted Endorectal Advancement Flap: A Novel Technique for Supralevator Fistula Repair
    Rojas, Maria A.
    Kamal, Tareq Q.
    Khan, Asfandyar
    Estrada, Joaquin J.
    Kaminski, Jan P.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (04) : E65 - E66
  • [49] Feasibility of Intracorporeal Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Appendiceal Interposition for Ureteral Stricture Disease: A Case Report
    Yarlagadda, Vidhush K.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Benson, Daniel G.
    Selph, J. Patrick
    UROLOGY, 2017, 109 : 201 - 205
  • [50] Robotic buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty (inlay and onlay) for upper ureteric stricture: Point of technique
    Ganpule, Arvind P.
    Singh, Abhishek G.
    Islam, Mohammed Rafiqul
    Sonawane, Parag
    Sabnis, Ravindra B.
    Desai, Mahesh R.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2018, 14 (04) : 357 - 361