Comparison of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in category IIIB chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A randomized prospective trial

被引:5
|
作者
Sevim, Mehmet [1 ]
Alkis, Okan [1 ]
Kartal, Ibrahim Gueven [1 ]
Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur [1 ]
Ivelik, Halil Ibrahim [1 ]
Aras, Bekir [1 ]
Kabay, Sahin [2 ]
机构
[1] Kutahya Hlth Sci Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Kutahya, Turkiye
[2] Altinbas Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
PROSTATE | 2023年 / 83卷 / 08期
关键词
chronic pelvic pain syndrome; chronic prostatitis; percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; SACRAL NEUROMODULATION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; SYMPTOM INDEX; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; URINARY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24513
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a heterogenous condition that impacts the Quality of life severely, and it has multimodal complex treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two well-described neuromodulation therapies, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of category IIIB CP/CPPS. MethodsThis study was designed as a randomized prospective clinical trial. We randomized category IIIB CP/CPPS patients into two treatment groups as TTNS and PTNS groups. Category IIIB CP/CPPS was diagnosed by two or four-glass Meares-Stamey test. All patients included in our study were antibiotic/anti-inflammatory resistant. Transcutaneous and percutaneous treatments were applied 30 min sessions for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated by Turkish-validated National Health Institute Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) initially and after treatment. Treatment success was evaluated within each group and also compared with each other. ResultsA total of 38 patients in the TTNS group and 42 patients in the PTNS group were included in the final analysis. The mean VAS scores of the TTNS group were lower than the PTNS group initially (7.11 and 7.43, respectively), (p = 0.03). The pretreatment NIH-CPSI scores were similar between groups (p = 0.07). VAS scores, total NIH-CPSI, NIH-CPSI micturation, NIH-CPSI pain, and NIH-CPSI QoL scores decreased significantly at the end of the treatment in both groups. We found a significantly higher VAS and NIH-CPSI scores decrease in the PTNS group compared to the TTNS group (p < 0.01). ConclusionBoth PTNS and TTNS are effective treatment methods in category IIIB CP/CPPS. Comparing the two methods, PTNS provided a higher level of improvement in terms of pain and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 758
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in the Symptomatic Management of Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Placebo-Control Randomized Trial EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Yang, J. R.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2008, 34 (06): : 714 - 714
  • [22] Efficacy of Percutaneous vs Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ahadi, Tannaz
    Noori, Ismaeel
    Soltani, Shayesteh Khalifeh
    Ghaboosi, Pouya
    Raissi, Gholam Reza
    BASIC AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 15 (04) : 499 - 508
  • [23] Randomized controlled Study on percutaneous versus transcutaneous posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Fecal Incontinence
    Oetting, P.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 36 (01) : 56 - 57
  • [24] Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Pain Management in Women with Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Correyero-Leon, Marta
    Calvo-Rodrigo, Javier
    Alvarado-Omenat, Jorge Juan
    Llamas-Ramos, Rocio
    Martinez-Terol, Ma Consuelo
    Llamas-Ramos, Ines
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [25] Effectiveness of Acupuncture on Chronic Prostatitis-Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Category IIIB Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Nonblinded, Clinical Trial
    Kucuk, Eyup Veli
    Suceken, Ferhat Yakup
    Bindayi, Ahmet
    Boylu, Ugur
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (03) : 636 - 640
  • [26] Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Correyero-Leon, Marta
    Llamas-Ramos, Rocio
    Calvo-Rodrigo, Javier
    Alvarado-Omenat, Jorge Juan
    Llamas-Ramos, Ines
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (11)
  • [27] WHAT TO DO IF PERCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION (PTNS) WORKS? A PILOT STUDY ON HOME BASED TRANSCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION
    Enrico, Finazzi Agro
    Valentina, Maurelli
    Angelo, Di Santo
    Filomena, Petta
    Claudio, Perugia
    Annunziata, Parisi Isabella
    Giuseppe, Vespasiani
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2011, 30 : 50 - 51
  • [28] Early evaluation of an implanted chronic tibial nerve stimulation device versus percutaneous nerve stimulation for the treatment of urinary urge incontinence
    Sirls, Larry T., II
    Schonhoff, Amanda
    Waldvogel, Angela
    Hasenau, Deborah
    Peters, Kenneth M.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 : S180 - S180
  • [29] Randomized clinical trial of transcutaneous electrical posterior tibial nerve stimulation versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for treatment of chronic anal fissure
    Youssef, Tamer
    Youssef, Mohamed
    Thabet, Waleed
    Lotfy, Ahmed
    Shaat, Reham
    Abd-Elrazek, Eman
    Farid, Mohamed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 22 : 143 - 148
  • [30] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence
    O'Connor, Alexander
    Reynolds, Elizabeth
    Molyneux, Clare
    Vasant, Dipesh H.
    Sharma, Abhiram
    Faulkner, Gemma
    McLaughlin, John
    Kiff, Edward
    Telford, Karen
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11