Risk assessment of coronary heart disease based on cloud-random forest

被引:45
|
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Rao, Congjun [1 ]
Goh, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Xinping [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Sci, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Singapore 119623, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Logist Inst Asia Pacific, Singapore 119623, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CHD; Risk assessment; CART; Cloud model; C-RF; FEATURE-SELECTION; LEARNING APPROACH; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s10462-022-10170-z
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a major public health problem affecting a nation's economic and social development. Risk assessing CHD in a timely manner helps to stop, reverse, and reduce the spread of many chronic diseases and health hazards. This paper proposes a cloud-random forest (C-RF) model combining cloud model and random forest to assess the risk of CHD. In this model, based on the traditional classification and regression trees (CART), a weight determining algorithm based on the cloud model and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory is applied to obtain the weights of the evaluation attributes. The attribute weight and the gain value of the smallest Gini coefficient corresponding to the same attribute are weighted and summed. The weighted sum is then used to replace the original gain value. This value rule is used as a new CART node split criterion to construct a new decision tree, thus forming a new random forest, namely, the C-RF. The Framingham dataset of the Kaggle platform is the research sample for the empirical analysis. Comparing the C-RF model with CART, support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural network (CNN), and random forest (RF) using standard performance evaluation indexes such as accuracy, error rates, ROC curve and AUC value. The result shows that the classification accuracy of the C-RF model is 85%, which is improved by 8, 9, 4 and 3% respectively compared with CART, SVM, CNN and RF. The error rate of the first type is 13.99%, which is 6.99, 7.44, 4.47 and 3.02% lower than CART, SVM, CNN and RF respectively. The AUC value is 0.85, which is also higher than other comparison models. Thus, the C-RF model is more superior on classification performance and classification effect in the risk assessment of CHD.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 232
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk assessment for coronary heart disease in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis
    Erb, N
    Pace, AV
    Douglas, KMJ
    Banks, MJ
    Kitas, GD
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 33 (05) : 293 - 299
  • [22] The Assessment of Interleukin-18 on the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
    Sun, Weiju
    Han, Ying
    Yang, Shuo
    Zhuang, He
    Zhang, Jingwen
    Cheng, Liang
    Fu, Lu
    MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 16 (05) : 626 - 634
  • [23] Fuzzy Risk Assessment Information System for Coronary Heart Disease
    Srivastava, Pankaj
    Sharma, Neeraja
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, VOL 2, 2019, 56 : 159 - 170
  • [24] Risk Assessment and Emergency Management of Coronary Heart Disease at Altitude
    Strapazzon, Giacomo
    Ponchia, Andrea
    Ellerton, John
    Brugger, Hermann
    HIGH ALTITUDE MEDICINE & BIOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01) : 97 - 98
  • [25] Risk assessment for coronary heart disease in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Erb, N
    Banks, MJ
    Kitas, GD
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (09): : S511 - S511
  • [26] Assessment of Risk for Developing Coronary Heart Disease in Asymptomatic Individuals
    Kappagoda, C. Tissa
    Amsterdam, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, 2009, 29 (04) : 207 - 219
  • [27] Assessment of the psychological risk factors of coronary heart disease in a sample of coronary patients
    Histon, C
    IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 17 (03): : 290 - 290
  • [28] Laboratory based calculation of coronary heart disease risk
    Bayly, GR
    Davies, P
    Bartlett, WA
    Husband, D
    Jones, AF
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 1998, 141 (01) : 187 - 187
  • [29] A flood risk assessment model based on Random Forest and its application
    Lai, Chengguang
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Zhao, Shiwei
    Wang, Zhaoli
    Wu, Xushu
    Shuili Xuebao/Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46 (01): : 58 - 66
  • [30] Risk Assessment of Gas Explosion Disaster Based on Random Forest Model
    Zhang, Qing
    2019 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING (ICAESEE 2019), 2020, 446