Yield prediction through integration of genetic, environment, and management data through deep learning

被引:14
|
作者
Kick, Daniel R. [1 ,2 ]
Wallace, Jason G. [3 ]
Schnable, James C. [4 ,5 ]
Kolkman, Judith M. [6 ]
Alaca, Baris [7 ,8 ]
Beissinger, Timothy M. [7 ,8 ]
Edwards, Jode [9 ]
Ertl, David [10 ]
Flint-Garcia, Sherry [1 ]
Gage, Joseph L. [11 ]
Hirsch, Candice N. [12 ]
Knoll, Joseph E. [13 ]
de Leon, Natalia [14 ]
Lima, Dayane C. [15 ]
Moreta, Danilo E. [6 ]
Singh, Maninder P. [16 ]
Thompson, Addie [16 ]
Weldekidan, Teclemariam [17 ]
Washburn, Jacob D. [1 ,2 ,18 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Plant Genet Res Unit, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Div Plant Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Ctr Plant Sci Innovat, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[5] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[6] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[7] Univ Goettingen, Div Plant Breeding Methodol, Dept Crop Sci, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[8] Univ Goettingen, Ctr Integrated Breeding Res, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[9] ARS, USDA, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[10] Iowa Corn Promot Board, Res & Business Dev, Johnston, IA 50131 USA
[11] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[12] Univ Minnesota, Dept Agron & Plant Genet, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[13] ARS, USDA, Crop Genet & Breeding Res Unit, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
[14] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Agron, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[15] Univ Wisconsin, Plant Breeding & Plant Genet Program, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[16] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Microbial Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[17] Univ Delaware, Plant & Soil Sci, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[18] Univ Missouri, USDA, ARS, Plant Genet Res Unit, Curtis Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
来源
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
phenotypic prediction; gene-by-environment interaction (GxE); GEM; convolutional neural network; deep learning;
D O I
10.1093/g3journal/jkad006
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of the phenotypic outcomes produced by different combinations of genotypes, environments, and management interventions remains a key goal in biology with direct applications to agriculture, research, and conservation. The past decades have seen an expansion of new methods applied toward this goal. Here we predict maize yield using deep neural networks, compare the efficacy of 2 model development methods, and contextualize model performance using conventional linear and machine learning models. We examine the usefulness of incorporating interactions between disparate data types. We find deep learning and best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) models with interactions had the best overall performance. BLUP models achieved the lowest average error, but deep learning models performed more consistently with similar average error. Optimizing deep neural network submodules for each data type improved model performance relative to optimizing the whole model for all data types at once. Examining the effect of interactions in the best-performing model revealed that including interactions altered the model's sensitivity to weather and management features, including a reduction of the importance scores for timepoints expected to have a limited physiological basis for influencing yield-those at the extreme end of the season, nearly 200 days post planting. Based on these results, deep learning provides a promising avenue for the phenotypic prediction of complex traits in complex environments and a potential mechanism to better understand the influence of environmental and genetic factors.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating multi-omics data through deep learning for accurate cancer prognosis prediction
    Chai, Hua
    Zhou, Xiang
    Zhang, Zhongyue
    Rao, Jiahua
    Zhao, Huiying
    Yang, Yuedong
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 134
  • [32] Leveraging Remote Sensing Data for Yield Prediction with Deep Transfer Learning
    Huber, Florian
    Inderka, Alvin
    Steinhage, Volker
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (03)
  • [33] A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF RIVER ENVIRONMENT FACTORS THROUGH DEEP LEARNING
    Zhang, Shengping
    Qi, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATE, 2022, 23 (97): : 146 - 153
  • [34] Incident prediction through logging management and machine learning
    El Abdelkhalki, J.
    Ben Ahmed, M.
    Slimani, A.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITY APPLICATIONS (SCA' 19), 2019,
  • [35] Changing Mobile Data Analysis through Deep Learning
    Kasnesis, Panagiotis
    Patrikakis, Charalampos Z.
    Venieris, Iakovos S.
    IT PROFESSIONAL, 2017, 19 (03) : 17 - 23
  • [36] Multimodal Deep Learning Integration of Image, Weather, and Phenotypic Data Under Temporal Effects for Early Prediction of Maize Yield
    Shamsuddin, Danial
    Danilevicz, Monica F.
    Al-Mamun, Hawlader A.
    Bennamoun, Mohammed
    Edwards, David
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [37] Enhancing Anti-VEGF Response Prediction in Diabetic Macular Edema Through OCT Features and Clinical Data Integration Based on Deep Learning
    Jung, Sung Ho
    Oh, Soon Jung
    Yoo, Hakje
    Yoon, Je Moon
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, PT II, AIME 2024, 2024, 14845 : 176 - 180
  • [38] DoorINet: Door Heading Prediction Through Inertial Deep Learning
    Zakharchenko, Aleksei
    Farber, Sharon
    Klein, Itzik
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (19) : 31456 - 31465
  • [39] Efficient Journey Planning and Congestion Prediction Through Deep Learning
    Bin Othman, Muhammad Shalihin
    Keoh, Sye Loong
    Tan, Gary
    2017 INTERNATIONAL SMART CITIES CONFERENCE (ISC2), 2017,
  • [40] Prediction of chemical composition of urinary stone through deep learning
    Kim, U. S.
    Kwon, H. S.
    Yang, W. J.
    Lee, W. C.
    Choi, C., I
    Kim, J. K.
    Lee, S. H.
    Han, J. H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S1366 - S1366