Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)

被引:3
|
作者
Farinha, Rui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Breda, Alberto [4 ]
Porter, James [5 ]
Mottrie, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben [6 ,7 ]
Vander Sloten, Jozef [8 ]
Mottaran, Angelo [9 ,10 ]
Gallagher, Anthony G. G. [1 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Orsi Acad, Proefhoevestr 12, B-9090 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Dept Urol, Aalst, Belgium
[3] Sao Jose Hosp, Dept Urol, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Urol, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Swedish Med Ctr, Swedish Urol Grp, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Urol, Louvain, Belgium
[7] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Louvain, Belgium
[8] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mech Engn, Sect Biomech, Louvain, Belgium
[9] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Div Urol, Bologna, Italy
[10] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
[11] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Louvain, Belgium
[12] Ulster Univ, Fac Life & Hlth Sci, Derry, North Ireland
关键词
Surgical training; Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Proficiency-based training; Metrics; Construct validation; Renal cancer; OPERATING-ROOM; PROFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY; ACQUISITION; VALIDATION; SURGEONS; METRICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01521-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
RAPN training usually takes place in-vivo and methods vary across countries/institutions. No common system exists to objectively assess trainee capacity to perform RAPN at predetermined performance levels prior to in-vivo practice. The identification of objective performance metrics for RAPN training is a crucial starting point to improve training and surgical outcomes. The authors sought to examine the reliability, construct and discriminative validity of objective intraoperative performance metrics which best characterize the optimal and suboptimal performance of a reference approach for training novice RAPN surgeons. Seven Novice and 9 Experienced RAPN surgeons video recorded one or two independently performed RAPN procedures in the human. The videos were anonymized and two experienced urology surgeons were trained to reliably score RAPN performance, using previously developed metrics. The assessors were blinded to the performing surgeon, hospital and surgeon group. They independently scored surgeon RAPN performance. Novice and Experienced group performance scores were compared for procedure steps completed and errors made. Each group was divided at the median for Total Errors score, and subgroup scores (i.e., Novice HiErrs and LoErrs, Experienced HiErrs and LoErrs) were compared. The mean inter-rater reliability (IRR) for scoring was 0.95 (range 0.84-1). Compared with Novices, Experienced RAPN surgeons made 69% fewer procedural Total Errors. This difference was accentuated when the LoErr Expert RAPN surgeon's performance was compared with the HiErrs Novice RAPN surgeon's performance with an observed 170% fewer Total Errors. GEARS showed poor reliability (Mean IRR = 0.44; range 0.0-0.8), for scoring RAPN surgical performance. The RAPN procedure metrics reliably distinguish Novice and Experienced surgeon performances. They further differentiated performance levels within a group with similar experiences. Reliable and valid metrics will underpin quality-assured novice RAPN surgical training.
引用
收藏
页码:1401 / 1409
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current Status of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
    Reyes, Jose M.
    Smaldone, Marc C.
    Uzzo, Robert G.
    Viterbo, Rosalia
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 13 (01) : 24 - 37
  • [32] Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: step by step
    Bitkin, Alper
    Tugcu, Volkan
    [J]. UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2012, 11 (03): : 221 - 224
  • [33] Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Endophytic Tumors
    Kim, Dae Keun
    Komninos, Christos
    Kim, Lawrence
    Rha, Koon Ho
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (11)
  • [34] Current status of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
    Gohil, Rishma
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Kooiman, Gordon
    Khan, Mohammed Shamim
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Challacombe, Ben
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) : 1602 - 1606
  • [35] Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Obese Patients
    Naeem, Naveed
    Petros, Firas
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Patel, Manish
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Kaul, Sanjeev
    Menon, Mani
    Rogers, Craig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [36] Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in contemporary practice
    Tanagho, Youssef S.
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    Figenshau, Robert S.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2013, 2
  • [37] Initial experiences with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
    Aron, Becsi
    Andras, Huettl
    Andras, Kubik
    Peter, Molnar
    Peter, Nyirady
    [J]. ORVOSI HETILAP, 2024, 165 (26) : 997 - 1001
  • [38] ROBOT-ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY: THE AALST TECHNIQUE
    De Naeyer, G.
    Ficarra, V.
    Borghese, M.
    Mottrie, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A523 - A523
  • [39] Perioperative Complications of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
    Eric H. Kim
    Jeffrey A. Larson
    Michael Figenshau
    R. Sherburne Figenshau
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2014, 15
  • [40] Complications of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Rakul, S. A.
    Pozdnyakov, K., V
    Eloev, R. A.
    [J]. ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2021, 17 (02): : 34 - 45