Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Increased Hamstring Mobility

被引:2
|
作者
Doeringer, Jeffrey R. [1 ]
Ramirez, Ramon [2 ]
Colas, Megan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Incarnate Word, Ila Faye Miller Sch Nursing & Hlth Profess, Rehabil Sci & Athlet Training, San Antonio, TX 78209 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Athlet Med, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Dr Pallavi Patel Coll Healthcare Sci, Dept Hlth & Human Performance, Exercise Sci Program, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
关键词
hip flexion; range of motion; circulation; therapeutic modalities; RANGE;
D O I
10.1123/jsr.2022-0015
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Context: Limited research reveals that the use of different soft tissue mobilization techniques increases tissue mobility in different regions of the body. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference between administering instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and therapeutic cupping (TC) on hamstring tightness. Design: Subjects attended one session wherein treatment and leg order were randomized before attending the session. A statistical analysis was completed using a 2 (intervention) x 2 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance at alpha level <= .05. Participants: Thirty-three subjects between the age of 18-35 years old with bilateral hamstring tightness participated in this study. Interventions: The IASTM and TC were administered on different legs for 5 minutes and over the entire area of the hamstring muscles. One TC was moved over the entire treatment area in a similar fashion as the IASTM. Main Outcome Measures: The intervention measurements included soreness numeric rating scale, Sit-n-Reach (single leg for side being tested), goniometric measurement for straight-leg hip-flexion motion, and superficial skin temperature. The timeline for data collection included: (1) intervention measurements for the first randomized leg, (2) 5-minute treatment with the first intervention treatment, (3) intervention measurements repeated for postintervention outcomes, and (4) repeat the same steps for 1 to 3 with the contralateral leg and the other intervention. Results: There was a main effect over time for Sit-n-Reach, measurement (pre-IASTM-29.50 [8.54], post-IASTM-32.11 [8.31] and pre-TC-29.67 [8.21], post-TC-32.05 [8.25]) and goniometric measurement (pre-IASTM-83.45 [13.86], post-IASTM-92.73 [13.20] and pre-TC-83.76 [11.97], post-TC-93.67 [12.15]; P < .05). Conclusion: Both IASTM and TC impacted hamstring mobility during a single treatment using only an instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization technique without any additional therapeutic intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 169
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effects of Light Pressure Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization at Different Rates on Grip Strength and Muscle Stiffness in Healthy Individuals
    Cheatham, Scott W.
    Martonick, Nickolai
    Krumpl, Lukas
    Baker, Russell T.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2023, 32 (06) : 731 - 736
  • [42] The effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on pain and function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Sien
    Sheng, Li
    Wei, Xiating
    Liang, Mingjie
    Xia, Jinming
    Chen, Jueru
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [43] Treatment of a patient with post-natal chronic calf pain utilizing instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization: a case study
    Bayliss, Amy
    Klene, Frank
    Gundeck, Evelina
    Loghmani, Mary
    JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2011, 19 (03) : 127 - 134
  • [44] EFFECT OF INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION ON EXERCISE-INDUCED MUSCLE DAMAGE AND FIBROTIC FACTOR: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Kim, Jooyoung
    Lee, Joohyung
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2019, 15 (04) : E18 - E27
  • [45] Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization- an emerging trend for soft tissue dysfunction
    Mahmood, Tahir
    Hafeez, Muhammad
    Ghauri, Muhammad Waqas
    Salam, Abdul
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 71 (03) : 977 - 981
  • [46] Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy in treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial
    Shewail, Fatma
    Abdelmajeed, Salwa
    Farouk, Mohamed
    Abdelmegeed, Mohamed
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [47] Effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy for pain, mobility, and disability in chronic low backache patients: a quasi-experimental study
    Mahmood, Tahir
    Abrar, Aroosha
    Atif, Malik Muhammad
    Mahmood, Wajeeha
    Batool, Farwah
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 28 (03) : 452 - 458
  • [48] A FORCE SENSING INSTRUMENT ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION DEVICE
    Alotaibi, Ahmed M.
    Anwar, Sohel
    Loghmani, M. Terry
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 10TH ANNUAL DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 1, 2017,
  • [49] Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization 2-Handed Grip Force Production Consistency During Simulated Treatment: A Technical Report
    Baker, Russell T.
    Martonick, Nickolai J. P.
    Smitley, Matthew C.
    Ludwig, Christopher M.
    Reeves, Ashley J.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2024, 33 (08) : 687 - 694
  • [50] Efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in comparison to gastrocnemius-soleus stretching for dorsiflexion range of motion: A randomized controlled trial
    Rowlett, Carrie A.
    Hanney, William J.
    Pabian, Patrick S.
    McArthur, Jordon H.
    Rothschild, Carey E.
    Kolber, Morey J.
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2019, 23 (02) : 233 - 240