Individual differences in the neural architecture in semantic processing

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Xin [1 ]
Hu, Yiwen [1 ]
Hao, Yaokun [1 ]
Yang, Liu [1 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Med Univ, Air Force Med Ctr, 28,Fucheng St, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY ARCHITECTURE; BRAIN; VARIABILITY; LANGUAGE; NETWORKS; STATE; TASK; FMRI; COMPREHENSION; NEUROBIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-49538-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Neural mechanisms underlying semantic processing have been extensively studied by using functional magnetic resonance imaging, nevertheless, the individual differences of it are yet to be unveiled. To further our understanding of functional and anatomical brain organization underlying semantic processing to the level of individual humans, we used out-of-scanner language behavioral data, T1, resting-state, and story comprehension task-evoked functional image data in the Human Connectome Project, to investigate individual variability in the task-evoked semantic processing network, and attempted to predict individuals' language skills based on task and intrinsic functional connectivity of highly variable regions, by employing a machine-learning framework. Our findings first confirmed that individual variability in both functional and anatomical markers were heterogeneously distributed throughout the semantic processing network, and that the variability increased towards higher levels in the processing hierarchy. Furthermore, intrinsic functional connectivities among these highly variable regions were found to contribute to predict individual reading decoding abilities. The contributing nodes in the overall network were distributed in the left superior, inferior frontal, and temporo-parietal cortices. Our results suggested that the individual differences of neurobiological markers were heterogeneously distributed in the semantic processing network, and that neurobiological markers of highly variable areas are not only linked to individual variability in language skills, but can predict language skills at the individual level.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SEMANTIC SPACE - REPLICATION AND EXTENSION
    SHIKIAR, R
    FISHBEIN, M
    WIGGINS, N
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1974, 9 (02) : 201 - 209
  • [32] INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN SEMANTIC MEMORY ACCESS
    HUNT, E
    DAVIDSON, J
    LANSMAN, M
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1980, 16 (03) : 177 - 177
  • [33] Individual differences in episodic and semantic interference tasks
    Soriano, F
    Macizo, P
    Bajo, T
    PSICOTHEMA, 2004, 16 (02) : 187 - 193
  • [34] INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN SEMANTIC ENCODING PROCESSES
    LORSBACH, TC
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1982, 15 (08) : 476 - 480
  • [35] Cross-task individual differences in error processing: Neural, electrophysiological, and genetic components
    Michael J. Frank
    Christopher D’Lauro
    Tim Curran
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2007, 7 : 297 - 308
  • [36] Cross-task individual differences in error processing: Neural, electrophysiological, and genetic components
    Frank, Michael J.
    D'Lauro, Christopher
    Curran, Tim
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 7 (04) : 297 - 308
  • [37] Individual Differences in Socioaffective Skills Influence the Neural Bases of Fear Processing: The Case of Alexithymia
    Pouga, Lydia
    Berthoz, Sylvie
    de Gelder, Beatrice
    Grezes, Julie
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2010, 31 (10) : 1469 - 1481
  • [38] The origins of semantic prediction: A layered processing architecture
    Kuperberg, Gina R.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 45 : S10 - S10
  • [39] AGE-RELATED SLOWING IN SEMANTIC INFORMATION-PROCESSING SPEED - AN INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES ANALYSIS
    HERTZOG, C
    RASKIND, CL
    CANNON, CJ
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1986, 41 (04): : 500 - 502
  • [40] Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing
    Kidd, Evan
    Donnelly, Seamus
    Christiansen, Morten H.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (02) : 154 - 169