Prioritisation of data-poor pharmaceuticals for empirical testing and environmental risk assessment

被引:6
|
作者
Cannata, Cristiana [1 ]
Backhaus, Thomas [2 ]
Bramke, Irene [3 ]
Caraman, Maria [4 ]
Lombardo, Anna [5 ]
Whomsley, Rhys [4 ]
Moermond, Caroline T. A. [6 ]
Ragas, Ad M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Biol & Environm Sci RIBES, Dept Environm Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] AstraZeneca, Global Sustainabil, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] European Med Agcy EMA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Ist Ric Farmacol Mario Negri IRCCS, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Lab Environm Chem & Toxicol, Milan, Italy
[6] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Safety Subst & Prod VSP, Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
Pharmaceuticals; Prioritization; Data gaps; Environmental risk assessment; ECOTOXICITY DATA; EXPOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2023.108379
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There are more than 3,500 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) on the global market for human and veterinary use. Residues of these APIs eventually reach the aquatic environment. Although an environmental risk assessment (ERA) for marketing authorization applications of medicinal products is mandatory in the European Union since 2006, an ERA is lacking for most medicines approved prior to 2006 (legacy APIs). Since it is unfeasible to perform extensive ERA tests for all these legacy APIs, there is a need for prioritization of testing based on the limited data available. Prioritized APIs can then be further investigated to estimate their environmental risk in more detail. In this study, we prioritized more than 1,000 APIs used in Europe based on their predicted risk for aquatic freshwater ecosystems. We determined their risk by combining an exposure estimate (Measured or Predicted Environmental Concentration; MEC or PEC, respectively) with a Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC). We developed several procedures to combine the limited empirical data available with in silico data, resulting in multiple API rankings varying in data needs and level of conservativeness. In comparing empirical with in silico data, our analysis confirmed that the PEC estimated with the default parameters used by the European Medicines Agency often - but not always - represents a worst-case scenario. Comparing the ecotoxicological data for the three main taxonomic groups, we found that fish represents the most sensitive species group for most of the APIs in our list. We furthermore show that the use of in silico tools can result in a substantial underestimation of the ecotoxicity of APIs. After combining the different exposure and effect estimates into four risk rankings, the top-ranking APIs were further screened for availability of ecotoxicity data in data repositories. This ultimately resulted in the prioritization of 15 APIs for further ecotoxicological testing and/or exposure assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Landslides hazard, vulnerability and risk mapping in the data-poor region of northern Pakistan
    Ullah, Yaseen
    Shafique, Muhammad
    Yu, Lei
    Shah, Nisar Ali
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 83 (19)
  • [32] Drought Assessment Using Gridded Data Sources in Data-Poor Areas with Different Aridity Conditions
    Nouri, Milad
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (11) : 4327 - 4343
  • [33] NANOPHARMACEUTICALS: TINY CHALLENGES FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF PHARMACEUTICALS
    Berkner, Silvia
    Schwirn, Kathrin
    Voelker, Doris
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2016, 35 (04) : 780 - 787
  • [34] Prioritising conservation actions for extremely data-poor species: A risk assessment for one of the world's rarest marine fishes
    Bessell, Tyson J.
    Stuart-Smith, Jemina
    Barrett, Neville S.
    Lynch, Tim P.
    Edgar, Graham J.
    Ling, Scott
    Appleyard, Sharon A.
    Gowlett-Holmes, Karen
    Green, Mark
    Hogg, Carolyn J.
    Talbot, Simon
    Valentine, Joe
    Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 268
  • [35] Inland fish stock assessment: Applying data-poor methods from marine systems
    Fitzgerald, Colm J.
    Delanty, Karen
    Shephard, Samuel
    FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (04) : 240 - 252
  • [36] The influence of gear selectivity and spawning behavior on a data-poor assessment of a spawning aggregation fishery
    Erisman, Brad E.
    Apel, Ashley M.
    MacCall, Alec D.
    Roman, Martha J.
    Fujita, Rod
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2014, 159 : 75 - 87
  • [37] A new role for effort dynamics in the theory of harvested populations and data-poor stock assessment
    Thorson, James T.
    Minto, Coilin
    Minte-Vera, Carolina V.
    Kleisner, Kristin M.
    Longo, Catherine
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2013, 70 (12) : 1829 - 1844
  • [38] Ensemble models for data-poor assessment: accounting for uncertainty in life-history information
    Rudd, Merrill B.
    Thorson, James T.
    Sagarese, Skyler R.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2019, 76 (04) : 870 - 883
  • [39] Risk Mitigation Measures: An Important Aspect of the Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals
    Liebig, Markus
    Floeter, Carolin
    Hahn, Thorsten
    Koch, Wolfgang
    Wenzel, Andrea
    Rombke, Jorg
    TOXICS, 2014, 2 (01): : 35 - 49
  • [40] Leaching behaviour of pharmaceuticals in soil-testing-systems:: a part of an environmental risk assessment for groundwater protection
    Oppel, J
    Broll, G
    Löffler, D
    Meller, M
    Römbke, J
    Ternes, T
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 328 (1-3) : 265 - 273